[1]陶杨华,雷晨茜.谁是主权国家的他者——列维纳斯责任伦理对构建人类命运共同体的启示[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2024,25(02):97-106.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2024.02.011]
　Tao Yanghua,Lei Chenxi.Who is the Other for Sovereign States? Insights from Levinas' Responsibility Ethics on Constructing a Community with a Shared Future for Mankind[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2024,25(02):97-106.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2024.02.011]
点击复制

谁是主权国家的他者——列维纳斯责任伦理对构建人类命运共同体的启示()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第25卷
期数:
2024年02期
页码:
97-106
栏目:
文史哲研究
出版日期:
2024-04-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Who is the Other for Sovereign States? Insights from Levinas' Responsibility Ethics on Constructing a Community with a Shared Future for Mankind
作者:
陶杨华; 雷晨茜
Author(s):
Tao Yanghua;  Lei Chenxi
关键词:
列维纳斯;  责任伦理;  人类命运共同体;  主权;  人民
Keywords:
Levinas;  responsibility ethics;  a community with a shared future for mankind;  sovereignty;  people
分类号:
B82-0; B565.59
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2024.02.011
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
列维纳斯责任伦理可以归纳如下:自由植根于善良之中,而善良意味着责任,意味着能够回应他者的苦难与呼唤,而这一回应他者的能力最初发端于他者之脸对我的触发。回应他者的能力正是“正义”这一概念的本质所在。正义优先于自由,正义授权了自由,这一列维纳斯责任伦理的核心洞见对我们思考人类命运共同体的构建极具启发意义。作为一个精神 - 伦理事件,人类命运共同体奠基于各大文明内在精神深处汇通的可能性之上。而文明之汇通正是汇通于人与人之间的伦理关系——正义之中。但正义之开启需要“他者之脸”的呼唤,在国际舞台上,这一能够向主权唤起正义的“他者”是“人民”。
Abstract:
Levinas' responsibility ethics can be summarized as follows: freedom finds its roots in kindness, with kindness embodying responsibility and the capacity to respond to others' sufferings and calls,and this ability to respond to others originated from the trigger of the other's face to me. The essence of “justice” is precisely this ability to respond to others. Justice takes precedence over freedom, and justice authorizes freedom. These core insights of Levinas' responsibility ethics offer profound enlightenment on envisioning a community with a shared future for mankind. As a spiritual-ethical event, a community with a shared future for mankind is based on the potential for convergence within the spiritual cores of major civilizations.Such convergence, fundamentally, is through ethical relationships among people—embodied in justice. But the beginning of justice needs the call of “the face of the other”. On the international stage, the “others” who are capable of invoking justice in sovereignty are the “people”.

参考文献/References:

[1]习近平.携手构建合作共赢新伙伴 同心打造人类命运共同体[N].人民日报,2015-09-29(2).
[2]习近平.在庆祝改革开放40周年大会上的讲话[N].人民日报,2018-12-19(2).
[3]孙向晨.面对他者:莱维纳斯哲学思想研究[M].上海:上海三联书店,2008:333.
[4]列维纳斯.总体与无限:论外在性[M].朱刚,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2016.
[5]霍布斯.利维坦[M].黎思复,黎廷弼,译.杨昌裕,校.北京:商务印书馆,2009.
[6]施特劳斯.霍布斯的政治哲学[M].申彤,译.南京:译林出版社,2001:5.
[7]韦伯.学术与政治[M].钱永祥,林振贤,罗久蓉,等译.桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2004:185.
[8]樊宏法.环境公平的尺度效应与中国环境公平的尺度建构[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2023,24(6):76-86.
[9]习近平提出,坚持和平发展道路,推动构建人类命运共同体[EB/OL].(2017-10-18)[2023-05-11].https://www.gov.cn/zhuanti/2017-10/18/content_5232664.htm.
[10]VOEGELIN E.Modernity without restraint:the political religions,the new science of politics,and science,politics,and Gnosticism [M].Columbia:University of Missouri Press,2000:218-219.
[11]马克思恩格斯文集:第3卷 [M].中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,编译.北京:人民出版社,2009:422.
[12]王文锦.礼记译释:下[M]. 北京:中华书局,2001:287.
[13]孟子[M].方勇,译注.北京:中华书局,2010.
[14]杨伯峻.论语译注[M].2版.北京:中华书局,1980:149.
[15]亨廷顿.文明的冲突与世界秩序的重建[M].周琪,刘绯,张立平,等译.修订版.北京:新华出版社,2009.

相似文献/References:

[1]石春梅,朱平.现代社会风险视域下科技价值观问题反思[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2014,15(02):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2014.02.001]
　SHI Chun mei,ZHU Ping.A Reflection on the Value of Science and Technology from the Perspective of Modern Social Risks[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2014,15(02):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2014.02.001]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:陶杨华,法学博士,浙江工业大学马克思主义学院副教授、硕士研究生导师; 雷晨茜,浙江工业大学马克思主义学院硕士研究生。
基金项目:国家社会科学基金青年项目“改革开放以来的宗教治理及其调适机制研究”(20CZJ023)。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01