[1]徐习文.对西画与民初画坛思想演变之关系的反思[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2016,17(05):118-126.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2016.05.014]
 Xu Xiwen.Reflections on Relationship between Western Paintings and Ideological Evolution of the Painting Circle in the Early Republic of China[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2016,17(05):118-126.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2016.05.014]
点击复制

对西画与民初画坛思想演变之关系的反思()
分享到:

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第17卷
期数:
2016年05期
页码:
118-126
栏目:
艺术学研究
出版日期:
2016-10-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Reflections on Relationship between Western Paintings and Ideological Evolution of the Painting Circle in the Early Republic of China
作者:
徐习文
Author(s):
Xu Xiwen
关键词:
西画 民初画坛 美术 写实 现代主义 思想演变
Keywords:
western paintings the painting circle in the early Republic of China arts realism modernism ideological evolution
分类号:
J202
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2016.05.014
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
民初画坛思想演变的一个重要表征是西方外来语汇如“美术”“写实”等逐渐取代中国传统画论的“图真”“气韵生动”等,与此相关的是“美术革命”“复兴中国画”、现代艺术运动等艺术思潮涌动。这种思想演变植根于中西绘画优劣论,因而也是中西文化矛盾的凸显和文化竞争的重要组成部分。但是,西画在竞争中是有备而来的,中国画则逐渐认识到“争辩”之重要性,从而在无意识中堕入西画思维方式,导致中国画失去文化立足点,加上更多层次的心态紧张而步入激进化的轨道。随着艺术革新的变化,中国传播西画的角色逐渐由西方传教士过渡到中国画家,中、西绘画间形成一种层累堆积的胶着,最终民初画坛的西画思潮也成了“中国画”的一部分。
Abstract:
One significant feature of ideological evolution of the painting circle in the early Republic of China is that traditional Chinese painting theories like “true figure” and “vivid tone” were replaced by western expressions like “arts” and “realism”. Similarly, there emerged some artistic ideological trends like “fine arts revolution”, “revival of Chinese painting” and modern art movement. This ideology lied in the theory of good and bad about Chinese and western paintings, which was the main display of contradictions between Chinese and western cultures and also an important part of cultural competition. However, western paintings were more prepared in the competition. Chinese paintings gradually realized the importance of “argues”, so they unconsciously followed the western thinking mode. As a result, Chinese paintings lost their foothold and with multi-level psychological stresses, they stepped into a radical track. With changes of artistic innovation, the role of spreading western paintings transformed from western missionaries to Chinese painters. The accumulated ankylosis formed between Chinese and western paintings. Finally, the western ideology of the painting circle in the early Republic of China became a part of “Chinese paintings”.

参考文献/References:

[1]郎绍君,水天中.二十世纪中国美术文选:上[M].上海:上海书画出版社,1999.
[2]GUTZLAFF C.Prospectus[J].The Chinese Repository,1833(2):187.
[3]E H贡布里希.图像与眼睛—图画再现心理学的再研究[M].范景中,译.杭州:浙江摄影出版社,1988:187.
[4]约翰·伯格.观看之道[M].戴行钺,译.桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2005:2.
[5]PURTLE J.Scopic frames: devices for seeing China in 1640[J].Art history,2010(33):54-73.
[6]LITTLE A,Gleanings from fifty years in China[M].London: Cambridge University Press, 1910:37.
[7]王中秀.《西洋画法》:李叔同的译述著作[J].美术研究,2007(3):80-85.
[8]卢辅圣.中国书画全书:第14册[M].上海:上海书画出版社,1993:716.
[9]卢辅圣.中国书画全书:第2册[M].上海:上海书画出版社,1993:127.
[10]葛兆光.中国思想史:卷2[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2000:683.
[11]吕澂.美术革命[J].新青年,1918,6(1):85.
[12]杭春晓.“共尊宋画”背后的经验、立场之差异-民初画学“激进”与“温和”之辨析[J].文艺研究,2010(3):118-125.
[13]林木.二十世纪二三十年代中国画画坛的国学回归潮[J].文艺研究,2005(12):112-117.
[14]陈师曾.陈师曾讲演对于普通教授图画科意见[J].绘学杂志,1920(1):10.
[15]朱万章.从“癸亥合作画社”到“国画研究会”[J].文艺研究,2008(12):129-136.
[16]杜少虎.独立画家群的“新方位”-民国时期超现实主义美术的引进和传播[J].文艺研究,2009(8):109-120.
[17]傅雷.我们的工作[M]//傅敏.傅雷文集·文学卷.合肥:安徽文艺出版社,1998:313.
[18]陈独秀.本志罪案之答辩书[J].新青年,1918,6(1):10.
[19]罗志田.变动时代的文化覆迹[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2010:22.
[20]胡适.我们走哪条路[M]//胡适作品集:第18册.台北:远流出版公司,1986:16.
[21]余英时.中国知识分子的边缘化[J].二十世纪(香港),1991(8):23.
[22]钱穆.中国思想史[M].2版.台北:学生书局,1988:282.
[23]梁启超.欧游心影录:梁启超游记[M].北京:东方出版社,2006:20.
[24]婴行.中国美术在现代艺术上的胜利[J].东方杂志,1930,27(1):1.
[25]水天中.“中国画”的名称和变化[J].美术,1986(2):8-11.
[26]周积寅.中国画论辑要[M].南京:江苏美术出版社,1985:214.
[27]文征明.衡山论山水画[M]//俞剑华.中国画论类编.北京:人民美术出版社,1986:710.
[28]埃里克·霍布斯鲍姆.传统的发明[M].顾杭,译.南京:译林出版社,2004:16.
[29]陈师曾.徐悲鸿赴法记[J].绘学杂志.1920(1):66.
[30]刘海粟.石涛与后期印象派[N].时事新报,1923-08-25.
[31]布迪厄.艺术的法则[M].刘晖,译.北京:中央编译出版社,2001:262.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:徐习文,东南大学艺术学院教授,博士生导师。
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-10-10