[1]蒋润.集部之学的余响：钱基博、钱钟书父子清代诗文研究述论[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2022,23(01):106-116.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2022.01.12]
　Jiang Run.The Afterglow of Paradigm of Jibu：On Qian Jibo and His Son Qian Zhongshus Research of Poetry and Prose in the Qing Dynasty[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2022,23(01):106-116.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2022.01.12]
点击复制

集部之学的余响：钱基博、钱钟书父子清代诗文研究述论()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第23卷
期数:
2022年01期
页码:
106-116
栏目:
文史哲研究
出版日期:
2022-01-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Afterglow of Paradigm of Jibu：On Qian Jibo and His Son Qian Zhongshus Research of Poetry and Prose in the Qing Dynasty
作者:
蒋润
Author(s):
Jiang Run
关键词:
钱基博; 钱钟书; 清代诗文; 文学史; 集部之学
Keywords:
Qian Jibo;  Qian Zhongshu;  poetry and prose in Qing Dynasty;  literary history;  paradigm of Jibu
分类号:
I2062;I2066;I209
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2022.01.12
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
钱基博、钱钟书父子秉持“集部之学”的理念治清代诗文，此理念以别集为中心，重心在作品本身的讲读研究，着重辨析诗文之源流正变与各家异同得失。钱基博关注之重点在清代文章，对桐城派尤多创见;而钱钟书关注之重点在清代诗歌,他的研究成绩多可见于《谈艺录》及其笔记手稿。在研究理念和方法上，钱氏父子均深受“集部之学”的影响:钱基博虽有文学史编纂的尝试，但未能摆脱传统文苑传及诗话文评著作的影响；钱钟书学术视野贯通中西，但在方法上更注重“文学批评”，其阅读趣味和批评方式均有着浓厚的个人色彩。钱氏父子“集部之学”的研究方式，虽有助于他们对清代诗文的关注，却与新兴“文学史”研究范式颇多扞格，其中呈现出的传统文学研究理念与新兴研究范式之间的互动，是近现代学术转型中一个值得关注的议题。
Abstract:
Qian Jibo and and his son Qian Zhongshu studied poetry and prose in the Qing dynasty with the idea of “paradigm of Jibu”. The idea takes Bieji as the center, focuses on the appreciation and analysis of the texts, distinguishes the original and the derivative and point outs authors’ advantages and flaws. Qian Jibo paid more attention to prose in the Qing dynasty, especially School of Tongcheng, about which he had more original ideas. While Qian Zhongshu laid emphasis on poetry and his achievements are presented in Tan Yi Lu as well as his note and manuscripts. As to research concept and approach, both of them were deeply influenced by “paradigm of Jibu”. Qian Jibo had tried to compile literature history, but his work doesn’t get rid of the influence of the traditional Wenyuanzhuan in historcal records and shihua in literary criticism. Qian Zhongshu had a thorough knowledge of both Chinese and western studies, but he preferred “literature criticism” in approach. His interest in reading and style of criticism are very personal. Although the research method of “paradigm of Jibu” can help them to focus on poetry and prose in the Qing dynasty, it is somewhat different from the paradigm of the emerging “literature history”. The interaction between the traditional literary research concept and the emerging research paradigm is a topic worth discussing in the modern academic transition.

参考文献/References:

[1]钱基博.“古书治要”之教材举例[J].新教育,1925(3):407418.
[2]钱基博.钱基博自传[J].江苏研究,1935,1(8):14.
[3]钱基博.中国文学史:下 [M].曹毓英,校订.武汉:华中师范大学出版社,2011.
[4]张舜徽.壮议轩日记[M].周国林,点校.武汉:华中师范大学出版社,2018:126.
[5]傅宏星.钱基博年谱[M].武汉:华中师范大学出版社,2007:94.
[6]戴燕.文学史的权力[M].增订版.北京:北京大学出版社,2018:87.
[7]钱基博.中学校教授中国文学史之商榷[J].教育杂志,1917,9(2):4659.
[8]陆侃如.评钱基博《中国现代文学史》[J].文艺先锋,1943,3(2):6466.
[9]钱基博.现代中国文学史[M].郭璋,校订.武汉:华中师范大学出版社,2011.
[10]刘红红.试论谭献的清代词史观[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2020,21(2):99 108.
[11]钱基博.国学要籍解题及其读法[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2012:165.
[12]钱钟书.槐聚诗存[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2001:1.
[13]钱钟书.中国文学小史序论[J].国风,1933(8):5 19.
[14]陆文虎.中国古典诗学的集大成和传统诗话的终结:读钱钟书《谈艺录》[M]//杨联芬.钱钟书评说七十年.北京:文化艺术出版社,2010:318.
[15]蒋寅.钱钟书清代诗学评论刍议[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2020,62(2):101 110.
[16]钱钟书.谈艺录[M].2版.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2008.
[17]钱钟书.钱钟书手稿集:中文笔记:第1册[M].北京:商务印书馆,2011.
[18]钱钟书.钱钟书手稿集:中文笔记:第2册[M].北京:商务印书馆,2011.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介：蒋润，武汉大学文学院博士研究生。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01