[1]童海浩.是否存在“自然法”这样的东西?——施特劳斯对历史主义的一个防御性回应[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2019,20(06):1-12.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2019.06.001]
　Tong Haihao.Does There Exist Something Like “Natural Law”? —A Defensive Response by Leo Strauss to Historicism[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2019,20(06):1-12.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2019.06.001]
点击复制

是否存在“自然法”这样的东西?——施特劳斯对历史主义的一个防御性回应()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第20卷
期数:
2019年06期
页码:
1-12
栏目:
政治·法学研究
出版日期:
2019-12-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Does There Exist Something Like “Natural Law”? —A Defensive Response by Leo Strauss to Historicism
作者:
童海浩
Author(s):
Tong Haihao
关键词:
古典自然正当论;  现代自然权利论;  历史主义
Keywords:
classical natural right theory;  modern natural right theory;  historicism
分类号:
D909.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2019.06.001
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
实证主义与历史主义方法支配了我们时代的思想,二者是相对主义的两种主要哲学形态,而相对主义是“现代性危机”的本质,它拒斥自然法。政治哲人列奥·施特劳斯(Leo Strauss)在《自然权利与历史》(1953)一书的第一章中认真思考,并批评了“历史主义”。一方面,作为理论的历史主义在逻辑上是自我击败的; 另一方面,作为实践的历史主义则会落入虚无主义与狂热蒙昧主义的规范后果。历史主义与自然法格格不入,施特劳斯试图通过批评历史主义,从而“迎回”自然法。但施特劳斯的论述仍只是产生防御性而非建构性的效果,围绕自然法理论还有很多工作要去做。
Abstract:
Thoughts of our time have been dominated by positivism and historicism approaches, both of which are major philosophical morphologies of relativism. Relativism is the essence of “crisis of modernity”, which rejects natural law. Political philosopher Leo presents his thoughts in Chapter One of Natural Right and History(1953)and criticizes “historicism”. On the one hand, historicism as a theory is logically self-defeated; on the other hand, historicism as a practice would cause normative effects of nihilism and fanaticism. Historicism is in conflict with natural law. Strauss tries to criticize historicism in order to bring natural law back. However, his arguments are only defensive instead of constructive. There remains much work to be done about natural law.

参考文献/References:

[1] FORTIN E. Ever ancient, ever new: rumination on the city, the soul, and the church [M]. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 2007: 205.
[2] 贝纳加.施特劳斯、韦伯与科学的政治研究[M].陆月宏,译.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2010:4.
[3] PANGLE T. Leo Strauss:an introduction to his thought and intellectual legacy [M].Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press,2006:32-42.
[4] 施特劳斯.自然权利与历史[M].彭刚,译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2006.
[5] ZUCKERT M,ZUCKERT C.Leo Strauss and the problem of political philosophy[M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press,2013:33.
[6] 李猛.自然社会——自然法与现代道德世界的形成[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2015.
[7] 施特劳斯.苏格拉底问题与现代性[M].彭磊,丁耘,译.北京:华夏出版社,2008.
[8] 施特劳斯.什么是政治哲学[M].李世祥,译.北京:华夏出版社,2014.
[9] 施特劳斯.古典政治理性主义的重生——施特劳斯思想入门[M],郭振华,译.叶然,校.北京:华夏出版社,2011:315.
[10] 萨弗兰斯基.海德格尔传——来自德国的大师[M].靳希平,译.北京:商务印书馆,1999:100.
[11] 海德格尔.尼采:下卷[M].孙周兴,译.北京: 商务印书馆,2002: 904.
[12] 俞吾金.形而上学发展史上的三次翻转——海德格尔形而上学之思的启迪[J].中国社会科学,2009(6):4-19.
[13] STRAUSS L. What is political philosophy [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,1988:27.
[14] HILL L J. After the natural law: how the classical worldview supports our modern moral and political values[M].San Francisco: Ignatius Press,2016:16.
[15] FORTIN E. Human rights, virtue, and the common good [M]. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers,1996:159.
[16] BESONG B. An introduction to ethics: a natural law approach [M]. Eugene: Cascade Books,2016: 221.
[17] KRIES D. The problem of natural law [M]. Lanham: Lexington Books,2008.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:童海浩,中国政法大学法学院博士研究生,美国圣母大学访问学者。
基金项目:国家哲学社会科学基金重点项目“良法善治视域下法治与德治关系研究”(15AZX021); 中国政法大学博士创新实践项目“自然法理论视域下的法治与德治之关系研究”(2017BSCX02)。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-12-30