[1]胡大伟.准征收视域下私人不可移动文物财产权的公法限制与补偿[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2018,19(05):42-50.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2018.05.005]
　Hu Dawei.Public Law Restriction and Compensation for Property Right of Private Immovable Cultural Relics in the View of Inverse Condemnation[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2018,19(05):42-50.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2018.05.005]
点击复制

准征收视域下私人不可移动文物财产权的公法限制与补偿()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第19卷
期数:
2018年05期
页码:
42-50
栏目:
政治·法学研究
出版日期:
2018-09-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Public Law Restriction and Compensation for Property Right of Private Immovable Cultural Relics in the View of Inverse Condemnation
作者:
胡大伟
Author(s):
Hu Dawei
关键词:
准征收;  私人不可移动文物财产权;  公法限制;  补偿
Keywords:
inverse condemnation;  property right of private and immovable cultural relics;  public law restriction;  compensation
分类号:
D923.2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2018.05.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
文物作为人类发展中的重要历史符号和文化遗产,具有公益属性。基于公共利益的考量国家可以通过法律对私人不可移动文物财产权施以限制,但这种限制须符合一定的限度,否则就构成对私人不可移动文物财产权类似征收的剥夺。准征收理论可为我国私人不可移动文物财产权限制的法治完善提供镜鉴。我国私人不可移动文物财产权限制的法律实践造成了私人利益的特别牺牲,具备了准征收的实际效果,缺乏公正补偿的限制既不符合公正价值理念,亦不利于私人不可移动文物的有效保护。促进我国文物保护的可持续发展,亟待正面回应私人不可移动文物财产权公法限制引发的准征收问题,探索建立私人不可移动文物财产权公法限制的补偿制度,确立公平无差别的补偿理念,明确补偿范围与标准,建立金钱补偿为主的多样化补偿方式。
Abstract:
Cultural relics, as important historical symbols and cultural heritage in human development, embody public interest attributes. Based on the public interest, the state can impose restrictions on the property right of private immovable cultural relics by way of law, but this must conform to a certain limit, otherwise it will constitute the deprivation of the property right of private immovable cultural relics just like expropriation. The theory of inverse condemnation can provide enlightenment for the perfection of the rule of law of the restriction on property right of private immovable cultural relics in China. The law restriction of restricting the property right of private immovable cultural relics has caused the special sacrifice of private interests which produces the effect of inverse condemnation. The lack of fair compensation does not conform to the concept of just value, nor is it conducive to the effective protection of private immovable cultural relics. To promote the sustainable development of the protection of cultural relics in China, it is urgent to respond positively to the problem of inverse condemnation caused by the public law restriction on property right of private immovable cultural relics, to explore the establishment of the compensation system of the public law restriction on the property right of private immovable cultural relics, to establish a fair and indifferent compensation concept, to define the scope and standard of compensation, and to establish diversified compensation methods taking money compensation as the major method.

参考文献/References:


[1]邓飞.拆毁文物墙,自家主人进班房“国宝”张谷英大屋文物破损案调查[EB/OL].(2002-09-09)[2018-06-10].http://www.southcn.com/news/community/shms/200209091237.htm.
[2]张黎明,范宝华,袁向群.兰溪一文保建筑被拆[N].金华日报,2012-11-30(A6).
[3]陈文,何姗,梁肇思.12村民上书反对自家列入历史建筑[N].新快报,2013-09-25(A20-A21).
[4]梅夏英.财产权构造的基础分析[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2002:141.
[5]王名,李朔严.十九大报告关于社会治理现代化的系统观点与美好生活价值观[J].中国行政管理,2018(3):60-63.
[6]王云霞,胡姗辰.公私利益平衡:比较法视野下的文物所有权限制与补偿[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015,68(6):101-110.
[7]谢哲胜.财产法专题研究:二[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004.
[8]Pennsylvania Coal Co.v.Mahon [DB/OL].(1922-12-11)[2018-06-10].https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/260/393/.
[9]金俭,张先贵.财产权准征收的判定基准[J].比较法研究,2014(2):26-45.
[10]张泰煌.从美国法准征收理论论财产权之保障[J].东吴法律学报,1998(1):113-157.
[11]张舜玺,马作武.公益与私益之间:论文物保护法的价值取向——以非国有不可移动文物保护为例[J].法学评论,2013,31(5):62-67.
[12] 刘连泰.确定“管制性征收”的坐标系[J].法治研究,2014(3):31-43.
[13] 张翔.财产权的社会义务[J].中国社会科学,2012(9):100-119.
[14]方军,郑楠,陈奇.地方政府公共政策执行力探赜——以A市N镇新农合政策实施为例[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2017,18(1):1-8.
[15]国家文物局.意大利文化与景观遗产法典[M].北京:文物出版社,2009:48.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:胡大伟,法学博士,浙江水利水电学院马克思主义学院教授。
基金项目:中国法学会部级法学研究课题“土地权利过度限制与损失补偿:不动产准征收的视角”[CLS(2017)D41]; 杭州市哲学社会科学规划基金一般项目“准征收视角下土地财产权利公法限制中的利益补偿问题研究”(Z18JC119)。
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-09-28