[1]张 顺.法治与德治的内在分歧及其协调[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2018,19(04):25-32.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2018.04.003]
　Zhang Shun.The Internal Divergence and Coordination between Rule of Law and Rule of Virtue[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2018,19(04):25-32.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2018.04.003]
点击复制

法治与德治的内在分歧及其协调()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第19卷
期数:
2018年04期
页码:
25-32
栏目:
法学研究
出版日期:
2018-07-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Internal Divergence and Coordination between Rule of Law and Rule of Virtue
作者:
张 顺
Author(s):
Zhang Shun
关键词:
法治;  德治;  形式理性;  拉德布鲁赫公式;  私人领域
Keywords:
rule of law;  rule of virtue;  rationality of form;  Radbruchsche Formel;  private domain
分类号:
D90; D920.0
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2018.04.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了实现法治与德治的融通互促,实有必要协调处理法治和德治重要理论分歧,具体表现在现实性与理想性、法的安定性与正义性、自由主义传统和道德内向性等三个层面。处理现实性与理想性之间的冲突,要求法治和德治遵循共同的价值诉求,并符合两者基本的治理逻辑; 调和法的安定性与正义性之间的矛盾,要求在尊重“拉德布鲁赫公式”的基础上,加强违宪审查等制度理性的建构; 协调自由主义传统与道德内向性之间的冲突,要确定人的自由和权利的初显优先性,然后将价值判断转化为法律技术问题进行处理。
Abstract:
In order to realize the mutual promotion between rule of law and rule of virtue, it is necessary to coordinate the major theoretical divergence between them at three levels, namely, realism and idealism, stability and justice of law, liberal tradition and moral introversion. Dealing with the conflict between realism and idealism, rule of law and rule of virtue should follow the common value pursuit, and conform to the logic of governance according to their basics. Reconciling the conflict between stability and justice of law, on the basis of respecting “Radbruchsche Formel”, the construction of institutional rationality such as unconstitutional review should be strengthened. Coordinating the conflict between liberal tradition and moral introversion, the primacy of human freedom and rights should be emphasized and then value judgment should be turned into the issue of legal technicality.

参考文献/References:


[1]王淑芹,刘畅.德治与法治:何种关系[J].伦理学研究,2014(5):64-68.
[2]夏勇.中国民权哲学[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2004:59.
[3]萨姆纳.权利的道德基础[M].李茂森,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2011.
[4]彭诚信.现代权利理论研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2017:244.
[5]柯岚.拉德布鲁赫公式与告密者困境——重思拉德布鲁赫-哈特之争[J].政法论坛,2009,27(5):136-146.
[6]拉德布鲁赫.法哲学[M].王朴,译.北京:法律出版社,2005:77.
[7]拉德布鲁赫.法律智慧警句集[M].舒国滢,译.北京:中国法制出版社,2001.
[8]柯岚.拉德布鲁赫公式的意义及其在二战后德国司法中的运用[J].华东政法大学学报, 2009(4):62-72.
[9]王书成.合宪性推定论:一种宪法方法[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2011:1.
[10]李惠宗.案例式法学方法论[M].台北:台湾新学林出版股份有限公司,2009:207-209.
[11]王泽鉴.人格权法:法释义学、比较法、案例研究[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2013:179.
[12]吕耀怀.隐私权保护的道德理由[J].学习与探索,2010(5):56-60.
[13]约翰·密尔.论自由[M].许宝骙,译.北京:商务印书馆,1959.
[14]乔尔·范伯格.对他人的损害[M].方泉,译.北京:商务印书馆,2013:68.
[15]乔尔·范伯格.对他人的冒犯[M].方泉,译.北京:商务印书馆,2014.
[16]哈特.法律、自由与道德[M].支振锋,译.北京:法律出版社,2006:2.
[17]The Committee on Homosexual Offenses and Prostitution. The wolfenden report[M]. New York: Stein and Day Incorporated, 1963:227.
[18]夏纪森.法治与德治:概念比较的考察[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2017,18(5):37-44.

相似文献/References:

[1]张建贤.论法治与政治文明的关系[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2004,5(02):1.
　ZHANG Jianx ian.The Relationship Between Constitutional Rul ing and Pol itical Civil ization[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2004,5(04):1.
[2]王 锋,谭苇禾.试论行政之恶及其规避之道——读《揭开行政之恶》[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2018,19(05):51.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2018.05.006]
　Wang Feng,Tan Weihe.On the Evil of Administration and Ways to Avoid it—A Review of “Opening the Evil of Administration”[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2018,19(04):51.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2018.05.006]
[3]夏纪森.法治与德治:概念比较的考察[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2017,18(05):37.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2017.05.006]
　Xia Jisen.Rule of Law and Rule by Virtue: A Comparative Study of Concepts[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2017,18(04):37.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2017.05.006]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:张顺,法学博士,常州大学史良法学院讲师。
基金项目:国家哲学社会科学基金重点项目“良法善治视域下法治与德治关系研究”(15AZX021); 中国法学会部级法学研究课题“国家治理体系中的法治与德治关系研究”[CLS(2017)D16]。
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-07-28