[1]苏琦.契嵩“非韩”说析论[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2017,18(05):1-6.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2017.05.001]
 Su Qi.The Examination of “Non-Han” by Qi Song[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2017,18(05):1-6.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2017.05.001]
点击复制

契嵩“非韩”说析论()
分享到:

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第18卷
期数:
2017年05期
页码:
1-6
栏目:
哲学研究
出版日期:
2017-10-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Examination of “Non-Han” by Qi Song
作者:
苏琦
Author(s):
Su Qi
关键词:
契嵩 儒释融会 “非韩”
Keywords:
Qi Song blending Confucianism and Buddhism “non-Han”
分类号:
B244
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2017.05.001
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
契嵩的《非韩》《辅教篇》《中庸解》是其捍卫佛教生存的护法代表作。《非韩》彻底确立了契嵩在北宋学界儒僧的崇高地位,更是其儒释融会、援儒卫佛思想体系的重要组成部分。在契嵩《非韩》的全面“非韩”中,契嵩站在反儒家经术的立场,从多个角度对韩愈进行了批判。其中,所占篇幅最大的当数对《原道》《原性》的批判。在系统激烈的“非韩”过程中,契嵩全面借用了儒家典籍经论,并且完全站在儒者的立场上以儒批儒,有力回击了当时学界空前的排佛浪潮,达到了“非韩”的目的。同时,契嵩的“非韩”在客观上促进了儒家对自身学理的反思和深掘,重新诠释了儒家的经义,开启了儒家义理向内圣与本体、心性发展的新维度和理学方向,在对后世理学产生影响的同时,更促进了北宋中期儒学的历史发展。
Abstract:
Non-Han, Auxiliary Education and Mediocrity are the representative works of Qi Song to defend the survival of Buddhism. Non-Han not only thoroughly established Qi Song's lofty position as a Confucian monk among scholars in the Northern Song Dynasty, but also was a significant part of his ideology blending Confucianism and Buddhism, supporting Confucianism and defending Buddhism. In Non-Han, from the perspective of anti-Confucianism, Qi Song criticized Han Yu from multi-angles, in which Yuan Dao and Yuan Xing are of the maximum length. In the systematic and fierce process of “non-Han”, Qi Song, from the standpoint of a Confucian, fully borrowed the Confucian classics, criticized Confucianism by use of Confucianism, fought against the unprecedented anti-Buddhism wave prevailing in academic circles, and achieved “non-Han”. Meanwhile, “non-Han” objectively promoted Confucians to reflect on and dig their ideologies, reinterpret Confucian classics, and opened a new page of Confucian development to the new dimension and neo-Confucianism direction of internal holy, ontology and nature of mind, which produced influential impacts on the later neo-Confucianism and promoted the historical development of Confucianism in the middle phase of the Northern Song Dynasty.

参考文献/References:

[1]洪淑芬. 儒佛交涉与宋代儒学复兴——以智圆、契嵩、宗杲为例[M].台北:大安出版社. 2008.
[2]欧阳永叔.欧阳修全集:第三册[M].上海:中央书店. 1936:23.
[3]石介.徂徕集:二[M]//王云五.四库全书珍本四集.北京:中华书局.1984:64.
[4]孙复.孙明复小集[M].北京:商务印书馆.2001:134.
[5]李觏.直讲李先生文集[M]//四川大学古籍整理研究所. 宋集珍本丛刊:第7册. 北京:线装书局, 2004:152.
[6]释契嵩.镡津文集校注[M].林仲湘,邱小毛,校注.成都:巴蜀书社.2014.
[7]韩愈.韩昌黎文集校注[M].马其昶,点校.马茂元,整理.上海:上海古籍出版社.1986:22.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:苏琦,中国人民大学哲学院博士研究生,合肥学院外语系讲师。
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-10-20