[1]赵延旭.北朝时期生态保护诏令考述[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2017,18(04):100-106.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2017.04.013]
　Zhao Yanxu.A Discussion about Edicts of Ecological Protection in the Northern Dynasties[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2017,18(04):100-106.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2017.04.013]
点击复制

北朝时期生态保护诏令考述()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第18卷
期数:
2017年04期
页码:
100-106
栏目:
文史研究
出版日期:
2017-08-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Discussion about Edicts of Ecological Protection in the Northern Dynasties
作者:
赵延旭
Author(s):
Zhao Yanxu
关键词:
北朝;  林木资源;  动物资源;  保护;  诏令
Keywords:
the Northern Dynasties;  forest resources;  animal resources;  protection;  edicts
分类号:
K239.2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2017.04.013
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
北朝时期颁布了一系列的生态保护诏令,主要涵盖了林木资源保护与动物资源保护两个方面。禁伐树木、森林防火、节约用材以及鼓励植树等诏令的颁发,客观上保护了这一时期的林木资源。与此同时,禁止猎杀、捕贡和畜养动物等诏令,一定程度上也起到了保护动物资源的作用。北朝时期的生态保护诏令虽具有不稳定性,颁行的主观目的亦在于维护政治安定,而且属于以义务为本位的律法,但其无疑为当时生态保护立法的主要形式,对于北朝时期生态环境的保护与改善具有重要意义,对后世生态保护律法的颁行亦影响深远。
Abstract:
In the Northern Dynasties, a series of edicts of ecological protection were promulgated, mainly concerning forest vegetation and animal resources protection. By promulgating edicts of prohibiting logging, preventing forest fire, saving timber and encouraging trees planting, objectively forest vegetation were protected. At the same time, edicts of prohibiting hunting, prohibiting tributes and keeping animals also protected animal resources. Although edicts of ecological protection in the Northern Dynasties were unstable, the subjective purpose was to safeguard the political stability and they belonged to the law of obligation, these edicts were still the main form of ecological protection legislation, and of great significance to the protection and improvement of ecological environment in the Northern Dynasties, as well as the promulgation and enforcement of environmental protection laws of later generations.

参考文献/References:

[1]陈寅恪.隋唐制度渊源略论稿·唐代政治史述论稿[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2001:3-4.
[2]班固.汉书[M].颜师古,注.北京:中华书局,1962.
[3]魏收.魏书[M].北京:中华书局,1974.
[4]长孙无忌.唐律疏议[M].岳纯之,点校.上海:上海古籍出版社,2013.
[5]令狐德棻.周书[M].北京:中华书局,1971.
[6]聂焱如.我国古代防火及火灾刑罚[J].现代职业安全,2009(3):71-73.
[7]李百药.北齐书[M].北京:中华书局,1971.
[8]陶泳,刘锡涛.唐代林业职官和护林诏令及造林活动[J].中国城市林业,2011,9(4):45-47.
[9]魏征,令狐德棻.隋书[M].北京:中华书局,1973:677.
[10]房玄龄.晋书[M].北京:中华书局,2015:1102.
[11]杨衒之.洛阳伽蓝记[M].范祥雍,校注.上海:上海古籍出版社,1978.
[12]赵超.汉魏南北朝墓志汇编[M].天津:天津古籍出版社,1992.
[13]赵美珍,邓慧明.我国古代森林资源保护立法之考量[J].汕头大学学报(人文社会科学版),2006,22(2):48-51.
[14]张梓太.中国古代立法中的环境意识浅析[J].南京大学学报(哲学·人文·社会科学),1998,35(4):155-160.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:赵延旭,历史学博士,河北工程大学建筑与艺术学院讲师。
基金项目:河北省教育厅科学研究计划项目“古代生态环境保护法律研究”(SQ161113)。
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-08-01