[1]陈昌荣,周林意.环境群体性事件中邻避事件:研究述评及展望[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2017,18(04):86-93.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2017.04.011]
　Chen Changrong,Zhou Linyi.The Literature Review and Outlook of “NIMBY Phenomenon” in Environmental Group Events[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2017,18(04):86-93.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2017.04.011]
点击复制

环境群体性事件中邻避事件:研究述评及展望()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第18卷
期数:
2017年04期
页码:
86-93
栏目:
社会学研究
出版日期:
2017-08-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Literature Review and Outlook of “NIMBY Phenomenon” in Environmental Group Events
作者:
陈昌荣; 周林意
Author(s):
Chen Changrong; Zhou Linyi
关键词:
群体性事件;  邻避事件;  邻避心理;  邻避行动;  研究述评
Keywords:
group events;  NIMBY events;  NIMBY psychology;  NIMBY actions;  literature review
分类号:
C913.9
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2017.04.011
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
“邻避”现象作为一个世界性难题,一直难以得到解决。近年来随着我国公民环境意识与权力意识的提升,邻避事件频发,这不仅严重影响了社会稳定与繁荣,而且也阻碍了社会经济的发展。学术界关于邻避事件的研究主要集中在邻避项目选址与决策研究、公众的邻避心理感知、邻避行动的产生、邻避型群体性事件的产生以及邻避型群体性事件的治理五个方面。基于对国内外学者相关研究的梳理,发现现有研究中存在三点不足:缺乏对我国民众邻避心理产生机制的梳理、缺乏邻避型群体性事件演进机制的全过程分析,缺少邻避事件治理的系统性方案。未来相关研究应该加强基于社会心理学视角的邻避事件研究,强化邻避行动产生的整体机制研究以及对于邻避事件的系统性治理框架的研究。
Abstract:
As a worldwide problem, NIMBY phenomenon has been difficult to be solved. In recent years, with the improvement of the consciousness of Chinese citizens’ environmental awareness and power awareness, NIMBY events occur frequently, which not only seriously affects the social stability and prosperity, but also hinders the development of social economy. Researches at home and abroad focus mainly on five aspects: site selection and decision making of NIMBY projects, the NIMBY psychological perception of the public, the generation of NIMBY actions, the generation of NIMBY group events and the governance of these group events. Through combing the related researches by domestic and foreign scholars, three problems in existing researches are found out: the lack of research on Chinese citizens’ NIMBY psychological mechanism, the lack of research on the whole process analysis of the evolution mechanism of NIMBY group events and the lack of research on the systematic method to govern NIMBY group events. Future relevant researches should strengthen the study of NIMBY events based on social psychology, the whole mechanism of the generation of NIMBY actions and the study of the framework of the systematic governance of NIMBY events.

参考文献/References:

[1]王娟,刘细良,黄胜波.中国式邻避运动:特征、演进逻辑与形成机理[J].当代教育理论与实践,2014(10):182-186.
[2]SHEN H W,YU Y H.Social and economic factors in the spread of the NIMBY syndrome against waste disposal sites in taiwan[J].Journal of Environmental Planning & Management,2010,40(40):273-282.
[3]丘昌泰,黄锦堂.解析邻避情节与政治[M].台北:翰蘆图书出版有限公司,2006:12.
[4]耶林,为权利而斗争[M].郑永流,译.北京:法律出版社,2007:65.
[5]曾峻.公共管理新论——体系、价值与工具[M].北京:人民出版社,2006:32.
[6]叶莹.网络化治理视域下公民参与邻避项目决策研究[D].南京:南京航空航天大学,2014.
[7]汤汇浩.邻避效应:公益性项目的补偿机制与公民参与[J].中国行政管理,2011(7):111-114.
[8]乌尔里希·贝克.风险社会[M].何博闻,译,南京: 译林出版社,2004:21.
[9]REAMS M A,TEMPLET P H.Political and environmental equity issues related to municipal waste incineration siting[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,1996,47(1-3):313-323.
[10]TSAO N.Ameliorating environmental racism: a citizens’ guide to combatting the discriminatory siting of toxic waste dumps[J].N.Y.U.Law Review,1992(67):366-418.
[11]BESFAMILLE M,LOZACHMEUR J M.NIMBY and mechanism design under different constitutional constraints[J].International Tax and Public Finance,2010,17(2):114-132.
[12]SIMSEK,ELCI.An improved landfill site screening procedure under NIMBY syndrome constraints[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2014,132:1-15.
[13]SAKAI,TOYOTAKA.Fair waste pricing: an axiomatic analysis to the NIMBY problem[J].Economic Theory,2012,50(2):1-23.
[14]ACHILLAS C,VLACHOHOKOSTS C,MOUSSIOPOULOS N,et al.Social acceptance for the development of a waste-to-energy plant in an urban area[J].Resources,Conservation and Recycling,2011,55(9-10):857-863.
[15]覃哲.邻避心理与大众媒介在冲突中的沟通功能[J].青年记者,2015(29):19-20.
[16]SCALLY C P,TIGHE J R.Democracy in action:NIMBY as impediment to equitable affordable housing siting[J].Housing Studies,2015,30(5):749-769.
[17]TERWEL B W,DAAMEN D D L,MORS E T.Not in my back yard(NIMBY)sentiments and the structure of initial local attitudes toward CO2,storage plans[J].Energy Procedia,2013(37):7462-7463.
[18]MANNARINI T,ROVERE A.Six factors fostering protest: predicting participation in locally unwanted and uses movements[J].Political Psychology,2009,30(6):895-920.
[19]DEVINE-WRIGHT P.Explaining “NIMBY” objections to a power line the role of personal,place attachment and project-related factors[J].Environment and Behavior,2013,45(6):761-781.
[20]张乐,童星.“邻避”行动的社会生成机制[J].江苏行政学院学报,2013(1):64-70.
[21]王学栋,陈菲菲.邻避行动的内在运作逻辑及其回应路径[J].行政论坛,2016,23(1):36-40.
[22]陈平.观念、制度与利益:集体行动的发生基础研究[D].北京:中共中央党校,2016.
[23]WONG N W M.Environmental protests and NIMBY activism:local politics and waste management in Beijing and Guangzhou[J].China Information,2016,30(2):1-22.
[24]JOHNSON R J,SCICCHITANO M J.Don’t call me NIMBY: public attitudes toward solid waste facilities[J].Environment & Behavior,2012,44(3):410-426.
[25]肖飞.邻避型群体性事件的防范之道——基于2012年三起典型案例的分析与思考[J].北京警察学院学报,2013(4):34-37.
[26]阳芳芳.城市邻避冲突的形成过程及治理路径探析[D].重庆:西南政法大学,2014.
[27]张广州.邻避型群体性事件的成因及其对策分析[J].吉林省教育学院学报,2015,31(4):141-143.
[28]余晔.邻避型群体性事件的治理研究[D].长沙:中南大学,2014.
[29]张熙炜.社会运动理论视角下的邻避运动研究[D].济南:山东大学,2014.
[30]徐畅.中国式邻避逆境的现状、成因与政策改进分析[C]//珞珈国是论坛.2014.
[31]林奇凯,张广州,刘海潮.邻避型群体性事件的产生及其治理[J].中共浙江省委党校学报,2014,30(6):112-117.
[32]王玉明.邻避型群体事件的特征、成因与应对[J].党政论坛,2015(9):24-28.
[33]王沛雯.邻避型群体事件频发:成因分析与应对策略[J].中共济南市委党校学报,2015(4):74-78.
[34]史杰.环境群体性事件的治理模式转型[D].南京:南京大学,2013.
[35]李婷.邻避运动暴力化的影响因素[D].济南:山东大学,2016.
[36]孙少荣,宗丽水,鲁红,等.理性行为与非理性行为[M],上海:上海财经大学出版社,2007:138.
[37]朱德米.政策缝隙、风险源与社会稳定风险评估[J].经济社会体制比较,2012(2):170-177.
[38]陶鹏,童星.邻避型群体性事件及其治理[J].南京社会科学,2010(8):63-68.
[39]科尔曼.生态政治: 建设一个绿色社会[M].梅俊杰,译.上海:上海世纪出版集团,2006:62.
[40]杨秋波.邻避设施决策中公众参与的作用机理与行为分析研究[D].天津:天津大学,2012.
[41]曼瑟尔·奥尔森.集体行动的逻辑[M].陈郁,译.上海: 上海三联书店,2006:2.
[42]朱德米.“重大决策社会稳定风险评估”不能走样[N].北京日报,2013-01-28(18).
[43]朱德米.开发社会稳定风险评估的民主功能[J].探索,2012(4):57-62.
[44]梁罗,王国婷,任荣明.邻避型群体事件与事后救济型群体事件的博弈比较[J].生态经济,2014,30(6):22-26.
[45]张婧飞.农村邻避型环境群体性事件发生机理及防治路径研究[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版),2015,32(2):35-40.
[46]何艳玲.“中国式”邻避冲突:基于事件的分析[J].开放时代,2009(12):102-114.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:陈昌荣,同济大学经济与管理学院硕士研究生; 周林意,同济大学经济与管理学院博士研究生。
基金项目:国家社会科学基金重大项目“我国市级发展规划编制中的公众参与机制研究”(13&ZD176)。
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-08-01