[1]李敦东,蒋静.学术语篇的主要人际资源及其功能[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2014,15(05):108-112.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2014.05.026]
　LI Dun-dong,JIANG Jing.Major Interpersonal Resources in Academic Discourses and Their Functions[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2014,15(05):108-112.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2014.05.026]
点击复制

学术语篇的主要人际资源及其功能()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第15卷
期数:
2014年05期
页码:
108-112
栏目:
出版日期:
2014-10-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Major Interpersonal Resources in Academic Discourses and Their Functions
作者:
李敦东1; 蒋静2
1.常州大学 外国语学院，江苏 常州 213164；2.上海零陵中学 英语教研组，上海 200032
Author(s):
LI Dun-dong1;  JIANG Jing2
1.School of Foreign Language studies, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China;2.Department of English Teaching and Research, Lingling Middle School, Shanghai 200032, China
关键词:
学术语篇; 功能转向; 人际资源; 人际功能
Keywords:
academic discourses;  functional shift;  interpersonal resources;  interpersonal functions
分类号:
H319
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2014.05.026
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
学术语篇研究已从客观描写转向功能解释。从功能角度出发将学术语篇中常见人际资源分为交互性、认知性和评价性成份三类。交互性资源为第一人称代词；认知性资源主要包括情态动词、情态附加成份、认知形容词、认知名词和过程动词等；评价性资源主要有语篇成份、解释性标记和句型结构等。此三类资源在构建人际交互性学术语篇过程中发挥了重要作用。鉴于此，学术论文写作及教学应抛弃对绝对科学客观性的传统追求，重视作者与读者之间的人际互动，恰当运用种种语言资源有效达成学术语篇的开放性和协商性。
Abstract:
Though a shift from objective description to functional interpretation has occurred in global studies of academic discourses, too much attention is still paid to the use of objective forms in domestic academic writing and teaching practices. A functional classification has divided major interpersonal resources in academic discourses into interactive, epistemic and evaluative resources. The first category covers first person pronouns, second modal verbs, modal adjunct, epithet, thing and process, third textual elements, interpretive markers and constructions. All these resources combine to realize the interpersonal meanings of academic discourses. Therefore, domestic academic writing and teaching practices should strive to shift from extreme objectivism to interpersonal interaction between authors and readers by employing more interpersonal resources to improve their openness and negotiability.

参考文献/References:

［1］ Markkanen R,H Schroder.Hedging and Discourse:Approaches to the Analysis of a Pragmatic Phenomenon in Academic Texts［M］. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1997:17.
［2］ Huddleston R D.The Sentence in Written English:A Syntactic Study Based on an Analysis of Scientific Texts ［M］.Cambridge:Cambridge at the University Press,1971:307—313. 
［3］ Barthes Roland.Le discours de l'école sur les texts ［J］.Littérature,1972(7):273—286.
［4］Swales,J.Genre analysis:English in academic and research settings ［M］.Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press,1990:23—24.
［5］ Tarone E,S.Dwyer S.Gillette,ect,On the use of the passive in two astrophysics journal papers ［J］.ESP Journal,1981(1):123—140.
［6］ Bazerman C.What written knowledge does:Three examples of academic discourse ［J］.Philosophy of the Social Sciences,1981(11):361—387. 
［7］ Peck MacDonald S.Problem definition in academic writing［J］.College English,1987(49):315—331. 
［8］ Stubbs,Michael.A matter of prolonged eldwork:notes towards a modal grammar of English ［J］.Applied Linguistics,1986(7):1—25.
［9］ Thompson G,Ye Y.Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers ［J］.Applied Linguistics,1991(12):365—382.
［10］ Hyland Ken.Writing without Conviction Hedging in Science Research Articles ［J］.Applied Linguistics,1996(17):433—454.
［11］ 李战子.学术话语中认知型情态的多重人际意义［J］.外语教学与研究,2001(5):353—358.
［12］ 杨信彰.英语学术语篇中的评论附加语［J］ .外语与外语教学，2006(10):11—14.
［13］ 张军民.基于语料库的英语学术语篇转述动词研究［J］.河南师范大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2012(5):246—249.
［14］ McCarthy M,R A Carter.Language as Discourse-Perspective for Language Teaching ［M］.London:Longman,1994:25.
［15］ Halliday M A K.An introduction to functional grammar ［M］.London:Edward Arnold,1985:106—167. 
［16］ 胡壮麟,朱永生,张德禄,等.系统功能语言学概论 ［M］.修订版.北京:北京大学出版社,2008:115—160.
［17］ Martin J R.Beyond exchange:APPRAISAL Systems in English ［M］//S Hunston,G Thompson.Evaluation in Text:authorial stance and the construction of discourse.Oxford:OUP,2000:74—101. 
［18］ 王振华.评价系统及其运作［J］ .外国语.2001(6):13—20. 
［19］ 汤洁.系统功能语法体系下的英汉名词化隐喻比较［J］.常州大学学报:社会科学版,2010(3):84—88.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介：李敦东（1977—），男，山东临沂人，硕士，讲师，主要从事理论语言学研究。蒋静（1979—），女，山东济宁人，硕士，主要从事系统功能语言学研究。 基金项目：常州大学2011年校教育研究课题（GJY11020050）。
更新日期/Last Update: 2014-09-25