[1]钱玉文,张鹏飞.论“人走股留”条款的效力—基于21份裁判文书的分析[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2022,23(05):8-12.
　Qian Yuwen,Zhang Pengfei.On the Effectiveness of the Clause of “People Leave and Shares Stay”:An Analysis Based on 21 Verdictss[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2022,23(05):8-12.
点击复制

论“人走股留”条款的效力—基于21份裁判文书的分析()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第23卷
期数:
2022年05期
页码:
8-12
栏目:
政治·法学研究
出版日期:
2022-09-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
On the Effectiveness of the Clause of “People Leave and Shares Stay”:An Analysis Based on 21 Verdictss
文章编号:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2022.05.002
作者:
钱玉文; 张鹏飞
Author(s):
Qian Yuwen; Zhang Pengfei
关键词:
“人走股留”;  资本多数决;  人合性
Keywords:
“people leave and shares stay”;  capital majority;  human compatibility
分类号:
D912.29
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
我国法院对“人走股留”条款法律效力认识不一,争议焦点集中在资本多数决的适用和企业的人合性两方面。股权转让关涉股东私权利,“人走股留”条款应该基于善意为公司整体利益而为之,主要应从行为人动机和股权转让条款内容两方面进行判断,关注相关价格条款的公平性,最终决定条款效力。
Abstract:
The courts in China now hold different attitudes towards the clause of “people leave and shares stay”. They application of capital majority and the human compatibility of the enterprisec are the two main focuses of dispute. The transfer of shares right involves the private rights of shareholders. The clause of “people leave and shares stay” should be based on good faith for the overall interests of the company. It should mainly be judged from two aspects of the actor’s motivation and the content of the equity transfer clause, and pay attention to the fairness of the relevant price clauses to finally determine the effectiveness of the clause.

参考文献/References:

[1]布莱克.法律的运作行为[M].唐越,苏力,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1994:48-49.
[2]罗培新.公司法强制性与任意性边界之厘定:一个法理分析框架[J].中国法学,2007(4):69-84.
[3]章程.从基本权理论看法律行为之阻却生效要件:一个跨法域释义学的尝试[J].法学研究,2019,41(2):23-41.
[4]GORDON J N.The mandatory structure of corporate law[J]. Columbia law review, 1989,89(7):1549-1598.
[5]MILLER S K.What remedies should be made available to the dissatisfied participant in a limited liability company?[J].The American university law review, 1994,44:465-536.
[6]王东光.股东退出法律制度研究[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2010:173-175.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:钱玉文,法学博士,江南大学法学院教授、硕士研究生导师; 张鹏飞,江苏当代国安律师事务所律师。
基金项目:国家社会科学基金一般项目“金融消费安全的公私合作规制研究”(18BFX138)。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01