[1]夏纪森,吴名驰.突发公共卫生事件中隔离措施的法律问题研究[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2020,21(06):18-29.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2020.06.003]
　Xia Jisen,Wu Mingchi.On the Legal Issues of Quarantine Measures inPublic Health Emergencies[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2020,21(06):18-29.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2020.06.003]
点击复制

突发公共卫生事件中隔离措施的法律问题研究()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第21卷
期数:
2020年06期
页码:
18-29
栏目:
政治·法学研究:公共卫生安全专题研究
出版日期:
2020-11-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
On the Legal Issues of Quarantine Measures inPublic Health Emergencies
作者:
夏纪森; 吴名驰
Author(s):
Xia Jisen; Wu Mingchi
关键词:
隔离措施;  合法性;  权利保护
Keywords:
quarantine measures;  legitimacy;  rights protection
分类号:
D922.16; R197.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2020.06.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
在突发公共卫生事件中,隔离措施的广泛实施有效阻断了疫情蔓延,此种措施在取得防疫实效的同时亦引发了公民基本权利与公共利益的抵牾。在法律规范中,隔离措施具有不确定性,相关措施必须以平等作为实质标准规范其界限,并从目的、权限、内容、手段、程序等五个方面进行合法性审查。在实践中,隔离措施的实施主体和人员存有合法性疑虑,被隔离人员的生活保障、隔离方式选择、隔离费用负担等新问题亦需从权利保护的角度加以审视和论证,从而使个人权利和公共利益达成平衡。
Abstract:
In public health emergencies, the widespread implementation of quarantine measures has effectively blocked the spread of the epidemic. While such measures have achieved effective results in epidemic prevention, they have also triggered a conflict between the basic rights of citizens and the public interest. In legal norms, quarantine measures are uncertain. Relevant measures must take equality as a substantive standard to regulate their boundaries and the legitimacy reviews should be conducted from five aspects: purpose, jurisdiction, content, means and procedure. In practice, the main implementing body and personnel of quarantine measures have doubts about legitimacy, and new issues such as the living guarantee of the quarantined persons, the choice of quarantine methods and the burden of quarantine costs also need to be reviewed and discussed from the perspective of rights protection so as to achieve the balance between individual rights and the public interest.

参考文献/References:

[1]康敬奎.《立法法》法律保留规则的缺失与完善[J].江海学刊,2012(2):136-142.
[2]孟德斯鸠.论法的精神:上册[M].张雁深,译.北京:商务印书馆,1961:154.
[3]陈新民.法治国公法学原理与实践:上册[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2007.
[4]姜明安.法治、法治思维与法律手段:辩证关系及运用规则[J].人民论坛,2012(14):6-9.
[5]赵鹏.疫情防控中的权力与法律:《传染病防治法》适用与检讨的角度[J].法学,2020(3):94-108.
[6]博登海默.法理学[M].邓正来,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2017:383.
[7]马怀德.应急管理法治化研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2010:9.
[8]段凡.论权力应是公权力[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012,65(5):45-51.
[9]车浩.刑事政策的精准化:通过犯罪学抵达刑法适用:以疫期犯罪的刑法应对为中心[J].法学,2020(3):49-75.
[10]罗纳德·德沃金.法律帝国[M].许杨勇,译.上海:上海三联书店,2016:139.
[11]王晨光.疫情防控法律体系优化的逻辑及展开[J].中外法学,2020,32(3):612-630.
[12]赵宏.疫情防控下个人的权利限缩与边界[J].比较法研究,2020(2):11-24.
[13]颜厥安.鼠肝与虫臂的管制[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2006:68.

相似文献/References:

[1]赵普光,方久月.“开明派”研究综述[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2017,18(03):92.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2017.03.014]
　Zhao Puguang,Fang Jiuyue.A Summary of the Study of “Liberal School”[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2017,18(06):92.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2017.03.014]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:夏纪森,法学博士,常州大学史良法学院教授、硕士研究生导师,南京师范大学中国法治现代化研究院特邀研究员; 吴名驰,常州大学史良法学院研究生。基金项目:国家社会科学基金重大专项课题“我国集中力量战胜重大突发事件的制度优势及其法治化”(20ZDA008); 江苏省研究生科研创新计划项目“突发疫情防控隔离措施法治化研究”(KYCX20_2516)。
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-11-20