[1]吕 杨.党争与乡评旋涡中的江南缙绅——明末郑鄤案考论[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2019,20(02):92-108.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2019.02.010]
　Lü Yang.A Scholar-Bureaucrat from the South of YangtzeRiver in the Whirlpool of Party Struggle and Village Judging—A Case Study of Zheng Man in the Late Ming Dynasty[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2019,20(02):92-108.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2019.02.010]
点击复制

党争与乡评旋涡中的江南缙绅——明末郑鄤案考论()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第20卷
期数:
2019年02期
页码:
92-108
栏目:
文史哲研究:考证专题研究
出版日期:
2019-04-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Scholar-Bureaucrat from the South of YangtzeRiver in the Whirlpool of Party Struggle and Village Judging—A Case Study of Zheng Man in the Late Ming Dynasty
作者:
吕 杨
Author(s):
Lü Yang
关键词:
郑鄤;  杖母;  温体仁;  乡评;  党争
Keywords:
Zheng Man;  rod one’s mother;  Wen Tiren;  village judging;  party struggle
分类号:
K248.305
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2019.02.010
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
明末士人郑鄤因被控“惑父披剃”“左道迫父杖母”“奸媳”“烝妹”四项罪名而罹难,但通过对相关史料的梳理和分析可发现,其被控罪名并不成立,计六奇在《明季北略》中,关于郑鄤案的记载讹误颇多。郑鄤之所以罹祸,其主要原因是郑鄤缺乏政治经验,陷入党争和政争的旋涡。郑鄤在乡诸多不法行径及狂傲的性格,导致其乡评极差,即使在东林内部,对其指责者亦颇多。明思宗刚愎自用的性格、反感党争的心态,以及有意借此案抑制黄道周、打击士大夫清议朝政的行为,则是促成郑鄤磔刑案的关键因素,四项罪名只是借口而已。
Abstract:
Zheng Man was sentenced to death because he was accused of tempting his father to tonsure, forcing his father to rod his mother by dishonest means, raping his daughter-in-law and committing incest with his young sister. Through the combing and analysis of relevant historical records, it is found that the accusation of Zheng Man is ill-founded. There are too many mistakes about Zheng Man case in MingJiBeiLue compiled by Ji Liuqi. In fact, the main reason for Zheng Man’s death is that he had little political experience and was caught in the whirlpool of party and government struggle. Due to his many illegal behaviors in the hometown and arrogant personality, village judging about him was always very terrible. He even received a lot of criticism within Dong Lin party. The primary reasons for Zheng Man’s death were emperor Sizong’s headstrongness and dislike of party struggle in the Ming Dynasty and he wanted to control Huang Daozhou through this case to suppress scholar-bureaucrats’ behaviors of carefree talks about state affairs, so the four charges were only excuses.

参考文献/References:


[1]王绍徽.东林点将录[M]//四库存目丛书:史部第107册.济南:齐鲁书社,1996:694.
[2]樊树志.党争漩涡中的郑振先郑鄤父子[J].文史知识,2003(12):68-76.
[3]宇文思理.明季郑鄤案[J].山海经,2016(5):17-18.
[4]郑礼炬.黄道周逸诗文辑佚[J].福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014(2):36-43.
[5]陆林.金圣叹与武进许氏兄弟交游考[J].中国典籍与文化,2014(1):43-50.
[6]吴琦,马俊.晚明乡宦与乡评之互动及其对地方秩序的影响[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2014(5):119-129.
[7]王森威.明代锦衣卫指挥使研究[D].大连:辽宁师范大学,2015.
[8]郑鄤.峚阳草堂文集:卷十六[M]//四库禁毁书丛刊:集部第126册.北京:北京出版社,2000.
[9]郑鄤.峚阳草堂文集:卷十四[M]//四库禁毁书丛刊:集部第126册.北京:北京出版社,2000.
[10]朱保炯,谢沛霖.明清进士题名碑录索引[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1980.
[11]计六奇.明季北略:卷十五[M].北京:中华书局,1981.
[12]茅元仪.三戍丛谭:卷二[M]//续修四库全书:子部第1133册.上海:上海古籍出版社,1995.
[13]陆以湉.冷庐杂识:卷五[M]//续修四库全书:子部第1140册.上海:上海古籍出版社,1995:531.
[14]抱阳生.甲申朝事小纪四编:卷九[M].北京:书目文献出版社,1987.
[15]蒋平阶.东林始末[M].北京:北京古籍出版社,2002:61.
[16]曹溶.崇祯五十宰相传[M]//四库全书存目丛书:史部第119册.济南:齐鲁书社,1996:15.
[17]谈迁.国榷:卷九十四[M].北京:中华书局,1959.
[18]黄宗羲.郑峚阳先生墓表[M]//黄宗羲全集:第10册.杭州:浙江古籍出版社,2005:271.
[19]陆继辂.合肥学舍札记:卷十一[M]//续修四库全书:子部第1157册.上海:上海古籍出版社,1995:396.
[20]梁章钜.浪迹丛谈:卷六[M]//续修四库全书:子部第1179册.上海:上海古籍出版社,1995.
[21]钱谦益.牧斋初学集:卷五十八[M]//四库禁毁书丛刊:集部第114册.北京:北京出版社,2000.
[22]郑鄤.峚阳草堂文集:卷一[M]//四库禁毁书丛刊:集部第126册.北京:北京出版社,2000.
[23]张廷玉.明史:卷二十三[M].北京:中华书局,1974.
[24]文秉.烈皇小识:卷二[M]//续修四库全书:史部第439册.上海:上海古籍出版社,1995.
[25]夏燮.明通鉴:卷八十四[M].长沙:岳麓书社,1999.
[26]张廷玉.明史:卷三百八[M].北京:中华书局,1974.
[27]张廷玉.明史:卷二百五十三[M].北京:中华书局,1974:6530.
[28](康熙)常州府志[M]//中国地方志集成·江苏府县志辑:第36册.南京:凤凰出版社,2008:183.
[29](康熙)武进县志:风俗[M].南京图书馆藏清刻本.
[30]吴宗达.吴文端公涣亭存稿:卷二十一[M].南京图书馆藏清刻本.
[31]张廷玉.明史:卷二百四十三[M].北京:中华书局,1974:6310.
[32]万斯同.明史:卷四百三[M]//续修四库全书:史部第331册.上海:上海古籍出版社,1995:353.
[33]张廷玉.御定通鉴纲目三编:卷十五[M]//文渊阁四库全书:史部第340册.台北:商务印书馆,1986:285.
[34]王世德.崇祯遗录[M]//四库禁毁书丛刊:史部第72册.北京:北京出版社,2000.
[35]顾天埈.顾太史文集:卷四[M]//四库禁毁书丛刊:集部第9册.北京:北京出版社,2000:79-80.
[36]陆世仪.复社纪略:卷三[M]//续修四库全书:史部第438册.上海:上海古籍出版社,1995:521.
[37]李清.三垣笔记:笔记上[M].北京:中华书局,1982.
[38]顾炎武.日知录集释:卷十三[M].黄汝成,集释.上海:上海古籍出版社,2006:800.
[39]郑鄤.峚阳草堂文集:附录[M]//四库禁毁书丛刊:集部第126册.北京:北京出版社,2000.
[40]徐树丕.识小录:卷二[M].涵芬楼秘笈影印本.
[41]王弘.山志:二集[M].何本方,注解.北京:中华书局,1999:264.
[42]夏允彝.幸存录:卷中[M]//续修四库全书:史部第440册.上海:上海古籍出版社,1995:536.
[43]赵吉士.续表忠记:卷一[M]//周骏富.明代传记丛刊:第36册.台北:明文书局,1991:487.
[44]顾炎武.陆贡士来复述昔年代许舍人曦草疏攻郑鄤事[M]//王冀民.顾亭林诗笺释.北京:中华书局,1998:598.
[45]张廷玉.明史:卷三百五[M].北京:中华书局,1974:7824.
[46]谷应泰.明史纪事本末:卷七十二[M].北京:中华书局,2015:1210.
[47]文秉.定陵注略:卷十[M].北京大学图书馆馆藏善本.
[48]蒋逸雪.张溥年谱[M].济南:齐鲁书社,1982:130.
[49]冷东.叶向高与明末政坛[M].汕头:汕头大学出版社,1996:111.
[50]苗棣.魏忠贤专权研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社1994:115.
[51]张廷玉.明史:卷二百五十五[M].北京:中华书局,1974.
[52]文秉.烈皇小识:卷三[M]//续修四库全书:史部第439册.上海:上海古籍出版社,1995:95.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:吕杨,历史学博士,常州大学周有光语言文化学院讲师。
基金项目:国家哲学社会科学基金一般项目“晚明江南社会治安研究”(15BZS061)。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-04-15