[1]支运波.《一九八四》似是而非的政治态度[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2015,16(06):73-76.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2015.06.012]
 Zhi Yunbo.The Paradox of Nineteen Eight-Four in Political Attitudes[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2015,16(06):73-76.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2015.06.012]
点击复制

《一九八四》似是而非的政治态度()
分享到:

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第16卷
期数:
2015年06期
页码:
73-76
栏目:
出版日期:
2015-11-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Paradox of Nineteen Eight-Four in Political Attitudes
文章编号:
2095-042X(2015)06-0073-04
作者:
支运波
江南大学 人文学院,江苏 无锡 214122
Author(s):
Zhi Yunbo
School of Humanities,Jiangnan University,Wuxi 214122,China
关键词:
奥威尔 《一九八四》 政治立场 矛盾性
Keywords:
Orwell Nineteen Eight-Four political stand paradox
分类号:
I106.4
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2015.06.012
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
奥威尔在其著名的反极权主义小说《一九八四》中流露出了一种似是而非、模棱两可的政治态度。这种模棱两可的政治态度和政治立场体现在:首先,奥威尔作者本人充满矛盾性的性格气质影响了他的政治立场; 其次,读者对于作者所塑造的大洋国中的治理技术是松动还是加强了,不知可否; 再次,究竟无产者能不能创造一个无政治监控的未来世界,奥威尔的态度也晦暗不明。这些模棱两可性,也在某种程度上促成和强化了《一九八四》不明朗的政治立场。
Abstract:
It has shown some degrees of equivocal and specious political attitude in Nineteen Eight-Four written by Orwell, which was famous for anti totalitarianism.This paradox is embodied in the following three aspects:Firstly,the author has a contradictoriness character influencing his political stand; Secondly,Reader could not make sure whether the political treatment technology in Oceana has been strengthened; Finaly,Orwell expresses a indeterminacy stand toward whether the proletarian can create a future without political control.This three uncertainties contributes to and strenthens partly the controversial view over Nineteen Eight-Four.

参考文献/References:

[1]Martha C Carpentier.The “Dark Power of Destiny” in George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four[J].Mosaic:a journal for the interdisciplinary study of literature,2014,47(1):179-194.
[2] Hugh Willmott.Strength is ignorance-slavery is freedom[J].Journal of Management Studies,1993,30:515-552.
[3] Dennis Poupard.Twentieth century literary criticism(Vol6)[M].Gale Research Company,1985:339.
[4] Pramode Verma.George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four—A retrospective and prospective twenty-five years later[J].International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection,2009,2:71-72.
[5] 夏志清.夏志清文学评论集[M].台北:联合文学杂志社,1987:37.
[6](英)乔治·奥威尔.奥威尔文集[M].董乐山,译.北京:中央编译出版社,2010:259.
[7]押沙龙,周有光.冷峻的良心·奥威尔传[M].北京:中国友谊出版公司,2013:199.
[8](美)杰弗里·迈耶斯.奥威尔传[M].孙仲旭,译.北京:东方出版社,2003:7,18.
[9](英)雷蒙·威廉斯.文化与社会[M].吴松江,张文定,译.北京:北京大学出版社,1991:363.
[10](美)理查德·A 爱泼斯坦.文学作品能起到社会科学的功效吗?——以乔治奥威尔为例[M]//(美)格里森.《一九八四》与我们的未来.董晓洁,侯玮萍,译.北京:法律出版社,2013:71.
[11] David Dwan.Truth and freedom in Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four,Philosophy and Literature[J].2010,34(2):381-393.
[12] Stephen Ingle.The social and political thought of George Orwell:a reassessment[M].London:Routledge,2008:15.
[13](英)伯特兰·罗素.罗素回忆录:来自记忆里的肖像[M].吴凯琳,译.太原:希望出版社,2006:170.
[14](英)乔治·奥威尔.一九八四[M].董乐山,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2012:37.
[15]George Orwell.Collected essays,journalism and letters of George Orwell[M].New York:Sonia orwell and Ian Angus,1968:88,468.
[16](苏)布卢姆·阿伦·维克托洛维奇.奥威尔在布尔什维克国家的遭遇以及一封鲜为人知的奥威尔致苏联的信[M]//林贤治,筱敏.人文随笔·2006·春之卷.广州:花城出版社,2005:141.
[17] Richand J Voorhees.The paradox of George Orwell[M].Indiana Polis:Purdue University Press,1986:15.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介: 支运波(1980—),男,安徽怀远人,博士,副教授,主要从事文艺学研究。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01