[1]季晓菁.胡文英《屈骚指掌》成书的背景研究[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2014,15(03):63-67.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095—042X.2014.03.015]
 JI Xiaojing.A Study of the Background of the Formation of Qu Sao Zhi Zhang By HU Wen—ying[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2014,15(03):63-67.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095—042X.2014.03.015]
点击复制

胡文英《屈骚指掌》成书的背景研究()
分享到:

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第15卷
期数:
2014年03期
页码:
63-67
栏目:
文史研究
出版日期:
2014-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Study of the Background of the Formation of Qu Sao Zhi Zhang By HU Wen—ying
作者:
季晓菁
盐城师范学院文学院,江苏盐城224051
Author(s):
JI Xiao—jing
College Of Liberal Arts,Yancheng Teachers University, Yancheng 224002, China
关键词:
胡文英《屈骚指掌》成书背景
Keywords:
Qu Sao Zhi Zhang HU Wen—ying background of the formation of Qu Sao Zhi Zhang
分类号:
K825.6
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095—042X.2014.03.015
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
胡文英《屈骚指掌》,是清代一部考证务实、见解通达的重要注本。胡文英虽为官从政,生活却“食贫居贱、辛苦流离”,尽管其窘迫之因与屈原有异,然亦可想象胡氏彼时境遇与屈子被放逐后“颜色憔悴、形容枯槁”之相通处,冥冥之中引领他在《楚辞》中找到了情感寄托之地。受考据之风熏染,胡文英注《楚辞》之方法与体例多与梁启超所概括的清代朴学之特征相符。又胡氏著有《庄子独见》,其释《庄》的方法,如“时文之法”、“空言之法”、“微探之法”、“品读之法”、“自得之法”等对治《骚》多有影响。文章从胡文英的生平、所处时代及著书三方面,挖掘其关联性,继而揭示《屈骚指掌》成书之背景。
Abstract:
HU Wen—ying's Qu Sao Zhi Zhang is a textual and pragmatic research in Qing Dynasty. Although HU Wen—ying was a government official, his life was humble and he wandered from place to place. Though the reasons for this are different from those for QU Yuan's, the situations are similar. Both suffered physically after they were exiled, which accidentally led HU to the empathy in Chu Ci. Under the trend of textual research, HU Wen—ying 's notes on Chu Ci are similar to the textual critic in Qing Dynasty summarized by LIANG Qi—chao in method and system. HU wrote The Special View of ZHUANG Zi, in which he interpreted ZHUANG Zi in some ways such as stereotyped writing, boring empty language, subtle exploration, reading method, analysis method and so on. These ways have great effects on the study of Chu Ci. This paper reveals the background of the formation of Qu Sao Zhi Zhang from the aspects of HU’s life, living times, works, and their association.

参考文献/References:

[1] 杨伯峻.孟子译注[M].北京:中华书局,2008:193.
[2] 江苏省地方志编纂委员会.江苏省通志稿·选举志·清贡生(二)[M].南京:江苏古籍出版社,1993:21.
[3] [清]汤成烈.中国地方志集成·江苏府县志辑(37)·光绪武进阳湖县志[M].[清]王其淦,吴康寿,修.南京:江苏古籍出版社,1991:480.
[4] [清]胡文英.屈骚指掌[M].北京:北京古籍出版社,1979:2.
[5] [清]胡文英,庄子独见[M].李花蕾,点校.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2011:2.
[6] [清]李兆浴.武进阳湖合志[M].[清]孙琬,修.武进区地方志办公室,点校.北京:方志出版社,2010:1187.
[7] [清]洪亮吉.诰授通议大夫内阁侍读学士升鸿胪寺卿加三品衔特赠光禄寺卿赐祭葬胡君墓志铭[M]//洪亮吉.洪亮吉集.北京:中华书局,2001:1000.
[8] [清]胡文英.吴下方言考[M]//续修四库全书.上海:上海古籍出版社,2002:5.
[9] 张惟骧.清毗邻名人小传稿[M].蒋维乔,登补.台北:明文书局,1985:94.
[10] 梁启超.清代学术概论[M].北京:人民出版社,2008:1.
[11] 李海生.中国学术思潮史·朴学思潮[M].上海:上海社会科学院出版社,2006:12.
[12] 梁启超.中国近三百年学术史[M].上海:东方出版社,2004:24—25.
[13] 李花蕾,张京华.胡文英与《庄子独见》[J].吉首大学学报:社会科学版,2011(5):29.
[14] 梁启超.论清学史二种·清代学术概论[M].上海:复旦大学出版,1985:39.
[15] 支伟成.清代朴学大师列传[M].台北:明文书局,1986:147.
[16] 吴泽,陈鹏鸣.常州学派史学思想研究[J].华东师范大学学报:哲学社会科学版,1995(3):42.
[17] 周建忠.《楚辞》研究五题回顾及反思[J].求索,1993(3):82.
[18] [清]永瑢.四库全书总目提要[M].北京:中华书局,1965:1270.
[19] 黄强.八股文与明清文学论稿[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2005:105.
[20] 郭沫若.屈原研究[M].上海:新文艺出版社,1941:24.
[21] 蔡觉敏.庄子和屈原之异同浅论[J].青海民族学院学报:社会科学版,2003(2):90.
[22] [宋]洪兴祖:楚辞补注[M].北京:中华书局,1983:16.
[23] [德]姚斯,[美]霍拉勃.接受美学与接受理论[M].周宁,金元浦,译.沈阳:辽宁人民出版社,1987:24.
[24] 陈鼓应.庄子今注今译[M].北京:商务印书馆,2007:627.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:季晓菁(1986—),女,江苏南通人,硕士,助教,主要从事大学生思想政治教育、中国文学研究。
更新日期/Last Update: 2014-06-30