[1]李泽昊.亲历者的诉说:《驴背集》的史学书写与省思[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2023,24(03):99-106.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2023.03.011]
　Li Zehao.By Those Who Had Experienced It: Writing and Reflection of The Collection on the Donkey Back[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2023,24(03):99-106.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2023.03.011]
点击复制

亲历者的诉说:《驴背集》的史学书写与省思()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第24卷
期数:
2023年03期
页码:
99-106
栏目:
文学地理专题研究
出版日期:
2023-07-18

文章信息/Info

Title:
By Those Who Had Experienced It: Writing and Reflection of The Collection on the Donkey Back
作者:
李泽昊
Author(s):
Li Zehao
关键词:
胡思敬;  《驴背集》;  义和团运动
Keywords:
Hu Sijing;  The Collection on the Donkey Back;  Boxer Movement
分类号:
K252; I207.22
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2023.03.011
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
《驴背集》是近代著名史学家胡思敬反映“庚子之役”的代表性史籍。在战乱期间,胡思敬常常微服入京,探听时政消息,归则择要记之。在记述“拳难”的过程中,胡氏不仅对义和团运动细致观察,深刻反思,而且直击宫廷的权力斗争,抨击当权者的丑态,可谓卓有特色。对于终生以清朝臣子自居的胡思敬而言,能够不避大不敬之嫌,在当代史著述中言辞激烈地直击清廷最高统治者的荒淫无耻和统治集团的弊政,这深刻反映出“庚子之役”后朝野对立已升级到对抗乃至决裂的局面。
Abstract:
The Collection on the Donkey Back is the representative records of “the battle in Gengzi Year” by the famous modern historian Hu Sijing. In times of war, Hu Sijing often visited Beijing without revealing his identity, inquired about the current political affairs, and kept a record of the important information when coming back. In the process of making notes of the “Boxer disaster”, Hu Sijing not only carefully observed the Boxer Movement and profoundly reflected, but also directly attacked the power struggle at court and criticized the ugliness of those in power, which was highly characteristic. For Hu Sijing who regarded himself as a loyal official of the Qing Dynasty in his lifetime, he dared not to avoid great disrespect to the royal, and radically attacked the luxurious and shameless life of the emperor and the mismanagement of the ruling class in the Qing Dynasty in writings of the contemporary history, which profoundly reflected the political situation that after “the battle in Gengzi Year”, the confrontation between the court and the folk had upgraded to opposition or even split.

参考文献/References:

[1]李泽昊.大变局中的乡贤:胡思敬的桑梓情怀[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2018,19(4):90-99.
[2]胡思敬.驴背集[M].刻本.江西:南昌退庐,1913(民国二年).
[3]胡思敬.戊戌履霜录[M].刻本.江西:南昌退庐,1913(民国二年).
[4] 乔纳森H.特纳.人类情感:社会学的理论[M].孙俊才,文军,译.北京:东方出版社,2009:11-12.
[5]何桂笙.开印《一二六论稿》[J].申报,1898-08-25(3).
[6]孙应祥.严复年谱[M].福州:福建人民出版社,2014:88-89.
[7]翁同龢.翁同龢日记:第5卷[M].翁万戈,编.翁以钧,校订.上海:辞书出版社,2020:2973.
[8]胡思敬.七别诗·别僚[M]//胡思敬.退庐诗集:卷三.刻本.江西:南昌退庐,1924(民国十三年).
[9]胡思敬.七别诗·别东华门[M]//胡思敬.退庐诗集:卷三.刻本.江西:南昌退庐,1924(民国十三年).
[10]胡思敬.吴中访旧记[M]//胡思敬.退庐文集:卷二.刻本.江西:南昌退庐,1924(民国十三年).
[11]胡思敬.覆刘幼云书[M]//胡思敬.退庐笺牍:卷二.刻本.江西:南昌退庐,1924(民国十三年).
[12]寒灰(杨毓麟).论本报所处之地位并祝其前途[M]//饶怀民.杨毓麟集.长沙:岳麓书社,2001:203-205.
[13]马克思恩格斯论中国[M].中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,编译.北京:人民出版社,2018.
[14]李希圣.庚子国变记[M]//中国新史学研究会.中国近代史资料丛刊:第9种 义和团.上海:神州国光社,1951:12.
[15]马克思恩格斯选集:第1卷[M]. 中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,编译.3版.北京:人民出版社,2012.

相似文献/References:

[1]李泽昊.大变局中的乡贤——胡思敬的桑梓情怀[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2018,19(04):90.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2018.04.010]
　Li Zehao.Rural Gentry in the Late Qing Dynasty —Hometown Feelings of Hu Sijing[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2018,19(03):90.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2018.04.010]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:李泽昊,历史学博士,常州大学马克思主义学院副教授、硕士研究生导师。
基金项目:教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目“优秀传统家训文化的传承与发展研究”(18YJC710036); 常州大学党建和思想政治工作研究会重点课题“‘六个坚持'融入高校思想政治教育研究”(22DJSZ06)。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01