[1]王篤堃.《尚书日记》版本流变考[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2019,20(02):109-116.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2019.02.011]
 Wang Dukun.On the Edition Evolution of ShangShuRiJi[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2019,20(02):109-116.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2019.02.011]
点击复制

《尚书日记》版本流变考()
分享到:

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第20卷
期数:
2019年02期
页码:
109-116
栏目:
文史哲研究:考证专题研究
出版日期:
2019-04-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
On the Edition Evolution of ShangShuRiJi
作者:
王篤堃
Author(s):
Wang Dukun
关键词:
王樵 《尚书日记》 版本流变
Keywords:
Wang Qiao ShangShuRiJi the edition evolution
分类号:
G256
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2019.02.011
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
王樵《尚书日记》是明代《尚书》学的代表作之一,但学术界对其版本研究尚显粗疏。经笔者考查,《尚书日记》现存版本可分为两个系统。万历十年于明照刻本为现存最早刻本,单独构成一个版本系统,于本之前原有他本,可惜已经亡佚。万历二十三年南昌彭燧刻本、万历二十五年蔡立身刻本、王锡琛重修本、崇祯五年庄继光重修本、文渊阁《四库全书》本合属一个版本系统。彭本作为后一版本系统之祖本,经王樵再次修订于本,增入《书帷别记》相关内容而成; 蔡立身依彭本重刻《尚书日记》,并作修正; 樵子肯堂、侄孙锡琛因《尚书日记》前本多已坏烂,于是就根据它们加以补刻,崇祯五年庄继光又据锡琛本重修。通过勘校诸本,可知蔡本内容完整,讹误最少,当为整理《尚书日记》之底本优选。
Abstract:
ShangShuRiJi is one of the representative works of ShangShu research in the Ming Dynasty, but research on its edition is still simple. According to my research, the existing editions of ShangShuRiJi can be divided into two systems. Yu Mingzhao’s block-printed edition in the 10th year of Wanli is the earliest known existing block-printed edition, which can constitute one system alone, and there was one edition earlier than Yu Mingzhao’s, but it was lost. Peng Sui’s block-printed edition in the 23rd year of Wanli, Cai Lishen’s block-printed edition in the 25th year of Wanli, Wang Xichen’s revised edition, Zhuang Jiguang’ revised edition in the 5th year of Chongzhen, the SiKuQuanShu edition in Wenyuange together form the other system. As the first edition of the latter system, Peng Sui’s block-printed edition was carved after Wang Qiao’s revision and ShuWeiBieJi was added to it; based on Peng’s edition, Cai Lishen carved ShangShuRiJi and did some corrections; Wang Kentang and Wang Xichen renovated ShangShuRiJi because the former editions were almost destroyed, and Zhuang Jiguang again renovated it in the 5th year of Chongzhen. Through textual research on these editions, it is found that Cai’s edition is more completed with fewer errors, which can be regarded as the best master copy to compile ShangShuRiJi.

参考文献/References:


[1]王重民.中国善本书提要[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1983:8.
[2]丁丙.善本书室藏书志[M]//清人书目题跋丛刊:二.北京:中华书局,1990:407.
[3]王樵.方麓集[M]//永瑢,纪昀.文渊阁四库全书:第1285册.台北:台湾商务印书馆,1986.
[4]许慎,段玉裁.说文解字注[M].许惟贤,整理.南京:凤凰出版社,2016:1187.
[5]孔安国,孔颖达.尚书正义[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2014:194.
[6]蔡沈.书集传[M].钱宗武,钱忠弼,整理.南京:凤凰出版社,2010.
[7]魏小虎.四库全书总目汇订:第1册[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2012:378.
[8]江庆柏.殿本、浙本《四库全书总目》著录图书进献者主名异同考[J].文史杂志,2007(1):235-251.
[9]永瑢.四库全书总目提要[M].北京:中华书局,1965:99.
[10]李维桢.大泌山房集[M]//四库全书存目丛书:集部第150册.济南:齐鲁书社,1997:440.
[11]中国科学院图书馆.中国科学院图书馆藏中文古籍善本书目[M].北京:科学出版社,1994:15.
[12]南开大学图书馆古籍组.南开大学图书馆馆藏线装书目录:经部[M]. 天津:南开大学出版社, 1982:20.
[13]张宝三.芝加哥大学东亚图书馆所藏中文经部善本书录四种[M]//沈乃文.版本目录学研究:第三辑.北京:国家图书馆出版社,2012:191-194.
[14]刘毓庆,张小敏.日本藏先秦两汉文献研究汉籍书目[M].太原:三晋出版社,2012:53.
[15]刘起釪.尚书学史[M].订补修订本.北京:中华书局,2017:312.

相似文献/References:

[1]王篤堃.《尚书日记》四库本讹误考辨[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2017,18(01):77.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2017.01.010]
 Wang Dukun.A Textual Study of Errors in the Si Ku Edition of Shang Shu Ri Ji[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2017,18(02):77.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2017.01.010]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:王篤堃,山东大学儒学高等研究院博士研究生。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-04-15