[1]周欣.理学递相推进:退溪李滉《近思录问目》的问学主题述论[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2020,21(05):79-87.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2020.05.009]
　Zhou Xin.The Progress of Neo-Confucianism: A Discussion on the Themes of Studying inThe Questions of Jin Si Lu by Tuixi Li Huang[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2020,21(05):79-87.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2020.05.009]
点击复制

理学递相推进:退溪李滉《近思录问目》的问学主题述论()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第21卷
期数:
2020年05期
页码:
79-87
栏目:
文史哲研究
出版日期:
2020-10-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Progress of Neo-Confucianism: A Discussion on the Themes of Studying inThe Questions of Jin Si Lu by Tuixi Li Huang
作者:
周欣
Author(s):
Zhou Xin
关键词:
李退溪;  《近思录问目》;  朱熹;  周敦颐;  性理学
Keywords:
Li Tuixi;  The Questions of Jin Si Lu;  Zhu Xi;  Zhou Dunyi;  Neo-Confucianism
分类号:
B244; B321
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2020.05.009
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
《近思录》系朱熹与吕祖谦集结北宋周敦颐、二程及张载的著述语录编纂而成的理学著作,至南宋始受到普遍的重视与广泛的传布。随朱子学东传韩国之后,退溪及其门人弟子以《近思录》为核心讲述问答,创造性地诠释“生之谓性”“冲漠无朕”等义理问题,融入“四端七情”“理有体用”等范畴,展现理学话语演进的多种互动,尤其在理学精神趣向方面表现得较为突出,注重涵泳性情,强调践履工夫,引领着圣学的精神气象。退溪以“传播—接受—转述”为路径,通过内在递进的逻辑理路,将《近思录》根植于东亚文化圈。
Abstract:
Jin Si Lu is a collection of Confucian works compiled by Zhu Xi and Lu Zuqian who compiled the quotations of Zhou Dunyi, Er Cheng and Zhang Zai in the Northern Song Dynasty, and has been widely valued and distributed since the beginning of the Southern Song Dynasty. After Zhu Xi's doctrine was introduced to South Korea, Tuixi and his disciples gave lectures centered on Jin Si Lu, creatively interpreting the philosophical connotations such as “the natural quality is called temperament” and “empty and intangible” and integrating categories like “four moral origins and seven emotions” and “body and function”, which demonstrates the multiple interactions of Confucian discourse evolution, especially in the aspect of Confucian spiritual interest, and emphasizes appreciation of temperament and practices, guiding the spirit of Confucian. Tuixi took “transmission-acceptance-paraphrase” as the path and rooted Jin Si Lu in the East Asian cultural circle through the logical path of internal progression.

参考文献/References:

[1] 朱熹,吕祖谦.近思录集释[M].长沙:岳麓书社,2010.
[2]李滉.近思录问目[M]//宋熹准.近思录注解丛编:第2册.大田广域市:学民文化社,1999.
[3]朱熹.朱子语类[M]//朱熹.朱子全书:第14册.朱杰人,严佐之,刘永翔,主编.上海:上海古籍出版社,2010.
[4]陈来.朱子哲学研究[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2010:248.
[5]李滉.进圣学十图札[M]//丁范镇.增补退溪全书.首尔:成均馆大学校出版部,1985:195-196.
[6]朱熹.太极图说解[M]//朱熹.朱子全书:第13册.朱杰人,严佐之,刘永翔,主编.上海:上海古籍出版社,2010:78.
[7]李滉.郑子中与奇明彦论学有不合以书来问考订前言以答如右·论冲漠无朕万象森然已具[M]//丁范镇.增补退溪全书.首尔:成均馆大学校出版部,1985:4.
[8]张立文.李退溪思想世界[M].北京:人民出版社,2013:212.
[9]李滉.心无体用辩[M]//贾顺先.退溪全书今注今译:第1册.成都:四川大学出版社,1992.
[10]朱熹.易学启蒙[M]//朱熹.朱子全书:第1册.朱杰人,严佐之,刘永翔,主编.上海:上海古籍出版社,2002:218.
[11]陈来.东亚儒学九论[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2008:6-7.
[12]吴锡源.韩国儒学的义理思想[M].邢丽菊,赵甜甜,译.上海:复旦大学出版社,2014:192.
[13]崔英辰.韩国儒学思想研究[M].邢丽菊,译.北京:东方出版社,2008:179.
[14]尹丝淳.韩国儒学史:韩国儒学的特殊性[M].邢丽菊,唐艳,译.北京:人民出版社,2017:155-156.
[15]李滉.答李仲久[M]//贾顺先.退溪全书今注今译:第1册.成都:四川大学出版社,1992:650.
[16]李滉.言行总录[M]//民族文化推进会.韩国文集丛刊:退溪集.首尔:民族文化推进会,1989:301.
[17]李纪祥.《近思》之“录”与《传习》之“录”[M]//李纪祥.宋明理学与东亚儒学.桂林:广西师范大学,2010:5.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:周欣,湖南科技学院学报编辑部副编审,湖南省濂溪学研究会秘书长。
基金项目:国家社会科学基金青年项目“朝鲜时代《近思录》著述整理与研究”(19CTQ012); 湖南省社科研究基地项目“湖南省濂溪学研究基地”(湘社科办〔2016〕12号)。
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-10-15