[1]王奎,黄冠凯.我国辩护律师证据收集权之审视[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2020,21(03):29-36.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2020.03.004]
　Wang Kui,Huang Guankai.Examination of Defense Attorney's Right to Evidence Collection[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2020,21(03):29-36.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2020.03.004]
点击复制

我国辩护律师证据收集权之审视()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第21卷
期数:
2020年03期
页码:
29-36
栏目:
政治·法学研究
出版日期:
2020-06-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Examination of Defense Attorney's Right to Evidence Collection
作者:
王奎; 黄冠凯
Author(s):
Wang Kui; Huang Guankai
关键词:
辩护律师;  证据收集;  申请调查取证权;  自行调查权
Keywords:
defense attorney;  evidence collection;  rights to investigation application and evidence collection;  right to self-investigation
分类号:
D925.2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2020.03.004
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
近些年,随着我国刑事诉讼法的修改,我国辩护律师证据收集权取得了长足进步,赋予了辩护律师侦查阶段辩护人地位、扩大了辩护律师的调查取证权、完善了相应的程序性保障措施,但即便这样,我国现有辩护人证据收集制度仍存在一定的问题,在申请调查取证权方面,存在接受申请的主体不合理、审核标准过于主观等问题,在自行调查取证权方面,存在自行调取证据的空间小、自行调取证据不被认可、自行调取证据的风险过高等问题,对此,有必要通过法律明确规定拒绝申请必须说明理由,建立相应的救济程序,加强人民检察院对侦查阶段的监督。
Abstract:
In recent years, with the revision of Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China, great progress has been made in defense attorney's right to evidence collection, which has endowed them with the status of defender in the investigation stage, expanded the investigation and evidence collection rights of the defense attorney and improved the corresponding procedural safeguard measures. However, there are still some problems of the system of evidence collection by defense attorney. In terms of applying for the investigation and evidence collection rights, there exist some problems such as unreasonable subject of accepting applications and too subjective examination standards. In terms of rights to self-investigation and evidence collection, there exist some problems such as the narrow scope of the rights, the unrecognized evidence and high risks. Accordingly, it is necessary to be clearly stipulated by law that reasons should be provided in case of application denial, establish corresponding relief procedures and strengthen the supervision of the investigation stage by the People's Procuratorate.

参考文献/References:

[1] 陈光中.完善的辩护制度是民主法治发达的重要标志[N].人民法院报,2016-08-07(8).
[2]林国强.我国庭审实质化改革障碍探析[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2019,20(4):27-36.
[3]韦恩·R.拉费弗,杰罗德·H.伊斯雷尔,南西·J.金.刑事诉讼法:下册[M].卞建林,沙丽金,等译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003:1206.
[4]田日守一.刑事诉讼法[M].穆津,刘迪,张凌,译.北京:法律出版社,2000:93.
[5]李昌坷.德国刑事诉讼法典[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1995:132.
[6]谢朝华,余叔通.法国刑事诉讼法典[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1997:44.
[7]黄风.意大利刑事诉讼法典[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1994:140-144.
[8]郑洋.我国亲告罪追诉模式之困境及其重构——以网络诽谤案件的证据收集问题为切入点[J].重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版),2019,31(6):32-39.
[9]陈瑞华.辩护律师调查取证的三种模式[J].法商研究,2014,31(1):73-84.
[10]熊谋林.从证据收集看审前羁押——基于A市的实证研究[J].华东政法大学学报,2016,19(2):141-155.
[11]陈学权.论辩护律师的法庭地位——以律师与法官的关系为视角[J].法学杂志,2020,41(1):99-112.
[12]陈瑞华.增列权利还是加强救济?——简论刑事审判前程序中的辩护问题[J].环球法律评论,2006(5):530-536.
[13]胡玮瑶.论刑事诉讼中辩方违法取证的责任追究——以“放宽下限制”为改革进路[J].宁夏大学学报(人文社会科学版),2015,37(6):140-144.
[14]陈兴良.为辩护权辩护—刑事法治视野中的辩护权[J].法学,2004(1):3-19.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:王奎,法学博士,湘潭大学法学院副教授; 黄冠凯,湘潭大学法学院硕士研究生。
基金项目:湖南省教育厅一般项目“论我国死刑案件有效辩护的实现”(09C979)。
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-06-30