[1]柯卫,冯海舒.域外被遗忘权法律制度保护的比较及启示[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2019,20(04):9-19.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2019.04.002]
 Ke Wei,Feng Haishu.Comparison and Enlightenment of the Overseas Legal System Protection of the Right to be Forgotten[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2019,20(04):9-19.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2019.04.002]
点击复制

域外被遗忘权法律制度保护的比较及启示()
分享到:

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第20卷
期数:
2019年04期
页码:
9-19
栏目:
政治·法学研究
出版日期:
2019-08-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison and Enlightenment of the Overseas Legal System Protection of the Right to be Forgotten
作者:
柯卫冯海舒
Author(s):
Ke WeiFeng Haishu
关键词:
域外被遗忘权法律制度制度保护比较
Keywords:
overseas the right to be forgotten legal system comparison of system protection’
分类号:
D908
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2019.04.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
被遗忘权是信息主体享有要求搜索引擎运营商删除互联网上损害其利益的过时信息的一种权利。目前我国立法尚未涉及有关个人数据的被遗忘问题,导致个人信息维权缺乏法律依据,数据主体得不到有效的法律保护。通过研究被遗忘权的确立与发展历程,比较分析欧盟和美国在被遗忘权法律保护方面的差异,根据互联网时代个人信息安全新特点,可获得对我国的立法启示:尽快制定个人信息保护法,它是被遗忘权建立的基础和依据;被遗忘权,作为公民的一项基本人权,有必要被纳入我国的法律体系;被遗忘权应重点保护未成年人,其个人信息应获得被遗忘权更多的重视和特别保护;在开放数据的大潮中做到保护与利用的动态平衡,促进个人信息保护和数据利用的协同发展,使被遗忘权能够成为一项真实的法定权利而得到有效保护。
Abstract:
The right to be forgotten is a right of information subject to require the search engine operators to delete damaging and outdated personal information on the Internet. At present, Chinese legislative system hasn’t dealt with the forgotten issue of personal data, which leads to the lack of legal basis for personal information maintenance and ineffective legal protection of data subjects. Through the research of the establishing and developing courses of the right to be forgotten, comparing and analyzing the differences between the European Union and the United States in the legal protection of the right to be forgotten, based on the new characteristics of personal information security in the Internet era, some enlightenment for Chinese legislation can be obtained: the personal information protection law should be made as soon as possible, which is the foundation and reference for the establishment of the right to be forgotten; the right to be forgotten is a fundamental human right which should be incorporated into Chinese legal system; the right to be forgotten should focus on protecting juveniles, whose personal information deserves more attention and special protection from the right to be forgotten; in the trend of open data, the dynamic balance between protection and utilization should be kept, the coordinated development of personal information protection and data utilization should be promoted, so that the right to be forgotten can be effectively protected as a real legal right.

参考文献/References:

[1] 吴飞,傅正科.大数据与“被遗忘权”[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2015,45(2):68 78.
[2] 维克托·迈尔 舍恩伯格.删除:大数据取舍之道[M].袁杰,译.杭州:浙江人民出版社,2013:235.
[3] 杨立新,韩煦.被遗忘权的中国本土化及法律适用[J].法律适用,2015(2):24 34.
[4] WITZLEB N,LINDSAY D,PATERSON M,et al.The ‘right to be forgotten’ in European data protection law[M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,2014:290 337.
[5] FLORIDI L.Protection of information and the right to privacy—a new equilibrium?[M].Cham: Springer International Publishing,2014.
[6] 齐爱民.大数据时代个人信息保护法国际比较研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2015:126.
[7] 张建文,高完成.被遗忘权的本体论及本土化研究[J].吉首大学学报(社会科学版),2016, 37(3):76 81.
[8] 万方.终将被遗忘的权利:我国引入被遗忘权的思考[J].法学评论,2016,34(6):155 162.
[9] BENNETT,STEVEN C.The right to be forgotten: reconciling EU and US perspectives [J].Berkeley Journal of International Law,2012(30):161.
[10] 李兵,展江.美国和欧盟对网络空间“被遗忘权”的不同态度[J].新闻记者,2016(12):63 70.
[11] 王毅纯.论隐私权保护范围的界定[J].苏州大学学报(法学版),2016,3(2): 89 102.
[12] 梁辰曦,董天策.试论大数据背景下“被遗忘权”的属性及其边界[J].学术研究,2015(9):3 36.
[13] 王利明.人格权法研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2016.
[14] 王利明.论个人信息权的法律保护:以个人信息权与隐私权的界分为中心[J].现代法学,2013,35(4): 62 72.
[15] 董亚君.美国青少年网瘾研究现状及对策对我国的启示[J].社会心理科学,2012, 27(9): 36 38.
[16] 薛亚君. 数字时代个人信息的被遗忘权[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2015, 38(4): 61 64.
[17] 齐爱民.信息法原论[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2010:65 97.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:柯卫,法学博士,广东财经大学法治与经济发展研究所教授、硕士研究生导师;冯海舒,闻泰通讯股份有限公司法务。
基金项目:广东财经大学法学院科研攻关攀登团队一般项目“网络空间法治化治理研究”。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-08-20