[1]卢少锋,李丹阳.刑事缺席审判程序适用中的相关问题思考[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2019,20(02):21-27.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2019.02.003]
　Lu Shaofeng,Li Danyang.On Problems in the Application of Criminal Trial by Default Procedure[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2019,20(02):21-27.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2019.02.003]
点击复制

刑事缺席审判程序适用中的相关问题思考()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第20卷
期数:
2019年02期
页码:
21-27
栏目:
政治·法学研究
出版日期:
2019-04-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
On Problems in the Application of Criminal Trial by Default Procedure
作者:
卢少锋; 李丹阳
Author(s):
Lu Shaofeng; Li Danyang
关键词:
刑事缺席审判程序;  证明标准;  辩护权;  上诉权;  救济
Keywords:
criminal trial by default procedure;  standards of proof;  right of defense;  right of appeal;  relief
分类号:
D925.2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2019.02.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
刑事缺席审判程序在法律条款中的出现标志我国刑事缺席审判制度的建立,使刑事缺席审判的司法价值付诸实施。理论探讨表明在刑事缺席审判程序适用过程中,在证明标准、缺席被告人辩护权与上诉权保障、救济与违法所得程序方面存在突出问题。证明标准不一,使不同类型的缺席审判案件做不到公平公正; 被告人辩护权得不到完整保障,刑事诉讼任一阶段无法主张辩护权都是对被告人的伤害; 缺席审判救济方式单一,被告人有权选择适当的救济方式; 目前违法所得程序与缺席审判程序存有交叉,制度设计中选用何种程序更为便利公正应为立法者考虑。建议扩大案件适用范围、建立异议审查程序和规定严格的适用条件以应对上述问题。
Abstract:
The appearance of criminal trial by default procedure in the legal provisions marks the establishment of the criminal trial by default system in our country, so that the judicial value of criminal trial by default is put into practice. Theoretical discussions show that in the course of the application of criminal trial by default procedure, there are obvious problems in aspects of the standards of proof, guarantee of the right of defense and the right of appeal of absent defendants, the procedure of relief and illegal income. The standards of proof vary, so that different types of trial by default cases can not be fair and just; the defendant’s right of defense is not fully guaranteed, and the inability to claim the right of defense at any stage of criminal procedure is harmful to the defendant; the relief method of trial by default is single, and the defendant has the right to choose the appropriate means of relief; at present, the procedure of illegal income overlaps with the trial by default procedure, and it should be considered by legislators to choose the appropriate procedure in the system design. It is proposed to expand the scope of application of the case, establish the objection review procedure and set strict conditions of application to deal with the above problems.

参考文献/References:


[1]张维炜.刑诉法迎来再度修改:关注反腐制度创新[J].中国人大,2018(9):34-36.
[2]陈卫东.论中国特色刑事缺席审判制度[J].中国刑事法杂志,2018(3):14-26.
[3]肖沛权.价值平衡下刑事缺席审判制度的适用[J].法学杂志,2018(8):50-59.
[4]胡志风.刑事缺席审判中的证明标准[J].国家检察官学院学报,2018,26(3):116-126.
[5]魏建文,魏昕.刑事缺席审判制度的价值分析[J].中国刑事法杂志,2009(6):68-71.
[6]马爽,朱玉玲.关于完善中国刑事缺席审判制度的思考[J].长春理工大学学报(社会科学版),2018,31(4):42-46.
[7]梅腾.刑事一体化视野下的被告人缺席判决制度[J].福建农林大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,21(5):96-102.
[8]叶青.刑诉法修改回应社会需求[N].检察日报,2018-10-30(3).
[9]樊崇义.腐败犯罪缺席审判程序的立法观察[J].人民法治,2018(13):42-45.
[10]钱文杰.我国刑事司法中的缺席审判——基于刑事诉讼特别没收程序的观察与思考[J].河北法学,2018,36(4):141-153.
[11]张书琴.违法所得特别没收程序与刑事缺席审判比较研究[J].学术探索,2013(11):22-27.
[12]钱映鸯.论我国腐败案件缺席审判制度的构建[D].杭州:浙江工业大学,2016.
[13]彭新林.腐败犯罪缺席审判制度之构建[J].法学,2016(12):58-65.
[14]汪建成,黄伟明.欧盟成员国刑事诉讼概论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2000:108.
[15]张西明.刑事缺席审判制度研究[D].济南:山东大学,2008.
[16]龙宗智.动态平衡诉讼观的几点思考[J].中国检察官,2018(13):6-7.

相似文献/References:

[1]徐凤利.我国刑事证明标准的反思与重塑[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2006,7(04):31.
　X U Feng- li.Ref lect ion on the Standard of Criminal Proof in Our Country[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2006,7(02):31.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:卢少锋,法学博士,郑州大学法学院副教授、硕士生导师; 李丹阳,郑州大学法学院硕士研究生。
基金项目:河南省教育厅人文社会科学研究一般资助项目“河南省青少年犯罪防控体系构建研究”(2018-ZZJH-531)。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-04-15