[1]杨心珉.唐代货币史中的国家认同问题[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2016,17(01):45-51.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2016.01.007]
 Yang Xinmin.On National Identity in the History of Currency in Tang Dynasty[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2016,17(01):45-51.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2016.01.007]
点击复制

唐代货币史中的国家认同问题()
分享到:

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第17卷
期数:
2016年01期
页码:
45-51
栏目:
出版日期:
2016-01-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
On National Identity in the History of Currency in Tang Dynasty
作者:
杨心珉
Author(s):
Yang Xinmin
关键词:
唐代货币史国家认同
Keywords:
Tang Dynastyhistory of currencynational identity
分类号:
D032
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2016.01.007
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
货币不仅仅是国家认同的结果,还能够通过文字信息的传播成为国家认同的重要建构方式。唐初时,政府对钱文形式的一系列改革使得作为文化符号的开元通宝钱式之宣传效率大大提高,其成功模式及经验直到唐朝衰亡后仍然被后世政权继承参考。尽管初唐时社会中私铸行为盛行,但当时社会对官钱形制的认可度以及官钱本身的通行度已有了显著提高,因此唐初货币制度的建构基本还是成功的。另外,乾元重宝发行后的社会问题说明,政治权力不能被视为国家认同的来源,而乾元钱币值下跌后的影响又说明,将国家认同作为政治权力行使的目的的作法,同样是不可行的。
Abstract:
Currency is not only a form of national identity,but also an important way to construct national identity through the transmission of character information.In the early Tang Dynasty,government reforms of currency character promoted the propaganda efficiency of Kaiyuan Tongbao currency as a cultural symbol.The successful model and experience was inherited and referred to by following regimes after the decline and fall of Tang Dynasty.Although private minting was prevalent in the early Tang Dynasty,social recognition of the form and system of official currency and the circulation of it had been improved obviously.So the construction of the currency system in the early Tang Dynasty was basically successful.Besides,social problems emerged after the issue of Qianyuan Chongbao showed that political power couldnt be regarded as the source of national identity, and influences of decline of Qianyuan currency showed that it was infeasible to take national identity as the purpose of execution of political power.

参考文献/References:

[1](英)哈耶克.货币的非国家化[M].姚中秋,译.北京:新星出版社,2007.
[2]吴玉军.符号、话语与国家认同[J].学术论坛,2010(12):75.
[3]欧阳彬.论货币与国家认同的建构[J].青海民族研究,2010(3).
[4](唐)魏征.隋书[M].北京:中华书局,1973. 
[5](南朝)沈约.宋书[M].北京:中华书局,1974:1735.
[6](宋)欧阳修.新唐书[M].北京:中华书局,1975:1384.
[7]中国钱币大辞典·魏晋南北朝编[M].北京:中华书局,2003:122.
[8](宋)洪遵.泉志[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1994.
[9](元)脱脱.宋史[M].北京:中华书局,1977:4375.
[10](后晋)刘昫.旧唐书[M].北京:中华书局,1975.
[11](南北朝)魏收.魏书[M].北京:中华书局,1974:2863.
[12]汪庆正.中国古代货币大系·秦汉三国两晋南北朝货币[M].上海:上海辞书出版社,2002:323.
[13](唐)杜佑.通典[M].北京:中华书局,1988.
[14](宋)王钦若.册府元龟[M].南京:凤凰出版社,2006:5687.
[15](德)马克思.资本论[M].北京:人民出版社,1975:70.
[16](德)马克思.政治经济学批判[M].北京:人民出版社,1955:77.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:杨心珉,湖州师范学院社会发展与管理学院讲师。〖HT〗〖HT5H〗基金项目:江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划项目“唐代货币史研究”(CXZZ13_0383);文化部文化艺术科学研究项目“艺术品传播与艺术创造活力研究”(14DH49)。
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-03-30