[1]贺中正.登记对抗理论下未登记动产抵押权对抗效力检视[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2024,25(04):20-29.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2024.04.003]
　He Zhongzheng.An Examination of the Adversarial Effectiveness of Unregistered Chattel Mortgage Right under the Theory of Registration Confrontation[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2024,25(04):20-29.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2024.04.003]
点击复制

登记对抗理论下未登记动产抵押权对抗效力检视()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第25卷
期数:
2024年04期
页码:
20-29
栏目:
政治·法学研究
出版日期:
2024-07-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
An Examination of the Adversarial Effectiveness of Unregistered Chattel Mortgage Right under the Theory of Registration Confrontation
作者:
贺中正
Author(s):
He Zhongzheng
关键词:
《中华人民共和国民法典》;  抵押登记;  未登记动产抵押;  第三人
Keywords:
The Civil Code of the People's Republic of China;  mortgage registration;  unregistered chattel mortgage;  third party
分类号:
D923.2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2024.04.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
《中华人民共和国民法典》对动产和权利统一担保体系进行了以“未登记不得对抗善意第三人”为核心的登记对抗化改造。就我国本土背景而言,源自比较法的“信赖保护说”“第三人否定说”等对抗理论,始终与我国物权理论体系有罅隙。只有本土化的对抗力工具论,不致与以物权法定为核心的物债二分体系等自相扞格,能在概念及逻辑构造上实现周延。登记对抗下的登记是法律拟制的、在意思主义模式下能够增强物权对抗力的工具。应以纵向层级的思路梳理未登记动产抵押权对抗效力问题。只要第三人权利的实现会对抵押权的实现造成影响,那么就认定其发生对抗。在对抗事实发生的基础上,权利的优先顺位当以对抗效力的有无、大小为主要标准,再辅以政策规定、价值衡量等。至于第三人范围,则需以主客观结合的解释方法予以澄清。
Abstract:
The Civil Code of the People's Republic of China has carried out the registration confrontation transformation of the unified security system for chattel and rights with “unregistered shall not be used against bona fide third party” as the core. As to China's situation, adversarial theories such as “trust protection theory” and “third party negation theory”, which originate from comparative law, have always been at odds with China's property rights theory system. Only the localized adversarial instrumental theory will not be at odds with the dichotomy of property and debt with property law as the core, can be extended in terms of concept and logical structure. Registration under registration confrontation is a legally fictitious tool that can enhance the confrontation of property rights under the model of intentionalism. The issue of the adversarial effect of unregistered chattel mortgage should be sorted out from a vertical and hierarchical approach. As long as the realization of the right of a third party will affect the realization of the mortgage right, then it is considered that there is a confrontation between them. On the basis of the fact of confrontation, the priority of rights should be determined by the existence and magnitude of the adversarial effectiveness, supplemented by policy provisions and value measurement. As to the scope of third party, it needs to be clarified by a combination of subjective and objective interpretations.

参考文献/References:

[1]王利明.担保制度的现代化:对《民法典》第388条第1款的评析[J].法学家,2021(1):30-39.
[2]龙俊.民法典中的动产和权利担保体系[J].法学研究,2020,42(6):22-42.
[3]高圣平.动产担保交易的功能主义与形式主义:中国《民法典》的处理模式及其影响[J].国外社会科学,2020(4):4-17.
[4]李永军.论财产权利“登记能力”对物权效力体系的影响[J].法商研究,2021,38(6):157-169.
[5]汪志刚.意思主义与形式主义对立的法理与历史根源[J].法学研究,2010,32(5):79-92.
[6]龙俊.中国物权法上的登记对抗主义[J].法学研究,2012,34(5):136-153.
[7]郭志京.也论中国物权法上的登记对抗主义[J].比较法研究,2014(3):95-113.
[8]LEARY M C.Obtaining and enforcing a security interest in local currency under article 9 of the UCC[J].University of richmond law review,2019,53(2):769-798.
[9]庄加园.动产抵押的登记对抗原理[J].法学研究,2018,40(5):76-94.
[10]近江幸治.担保物权法[M].祝娅,王卫军,房兆融,译.北京:法律出版社,2000:251-252.
[11]OMAR P.Secured credit in Europe:from conflicts to compatibility[J].International insovlency review,2018,27(3):451-453.
[12]D'ONFRO D.Limited liability property[J].Cardozo law review,2018,39(4):1365-1428.
[13]张锡鹏,刘丽敏.传统物权、债权二分法理论面临的挑战:兼论重构开放的物权、债权概念[J].河北法学,2005,23(2):123-129.
[14]加贺山茂,于敏.日本物权法中的对抗问题[J].外国法译评,2000,22(2):18-25.
[15]尹田.物权法理论评析与思考[M].2版.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008:268.
[16]崔拴林.民法典动产担保登记对抗规则释论:针对“未经登记不得对抗善意第三人”的分析[J].江海学刊,2022(5):166-175.
[17]王洪亮.动产抵押登记效力规则的独立性解析[J].法学,2009(11):88-98.
[18]黄泰岩.运用历史唯物主义世界观构建中国经济学[J].经济学动态,2023(1):3-10.
[19]CASTELLANO G G,DUBOVEC M.Credit creation: reconciling legal and regulatory incentives[J].Law and contemporary problems,2018,81(1):63-86.
[20]ELDAR O,VERSTEIN A.The enduring distinction between business entities and security interests[J].Southern California law review,2019,92(2):213-272.
[21]李运杨.《民法典》中超级优先顺位规则的法律适用[J].法学家,2022(2):119-132.
[22]李文涛,龙翼飞.“不登记不得对抗第三人”规则中“第三人”范围的界定:以对传统民法形式逻辑的检讨为思路[J].法学杂志,2012,33(8):54-59.
[23]于海涌.法国保全性裁判抵押权制度研究:兼论我国不动产查封制度的完善[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2006,21(3):138-144.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:贺中正,武汉大学法学院博士研究生。
基金项目:国家社会科学基金一般项目“治理整顿背景下网络借贷机构退出机制研究”(20STA046); 甘肃省教育厅优秀研究生“创新之星”项目“优化营商环境背景下网络交易平台退市民事责任研究”(2022CXZX-036)。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01