[1]迟欣.人类学诗歌学理及其特点探赜[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2024,25(01):89-101.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2024.01.009]
 Chi Xin.The Exploration of Anthropological Poetry Theory and Its Characteristics[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2024,25(01):89-101.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2024.01.009]
点击复制

人类学诗歌学理及其特点探赜()
分享到:

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第25卷
期数:
2024年01期
页码:
89-101
栏目:
文史哲研究
出版日期:
2024-02-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Exploration of Anthropological Poetry Theory and Its Characteristics
作者:
迟欣
Author(s):
Chi Xin
关键词:
人类学诗歌 民族志诗歌 移情 人类学诗学 反话语
Keywords:
anthropological poetry ethnographic poetry empathy anthropological poetics counter-discourse
分类号:
I106.2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2024.01.009
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
人类学诗歌是一种新的文学样态, 而中国学者通常会把人类学诗歌与民族志诗歌混淆在一起,因此首先要对人类学诗歌的萌发与界定予以澄清。其次,“诗学”的演变与人类学诗学中的“移情”相互勾连,促成了人类学诗歌的学理剖析。最后,对人类学诗歌回归原始、彰显自然、蕴含“他文化”理念、科学理性与人文理性共生、“反话语”等特点的归纳与总结将有助于揭示诗歌作为一种文化传统和象征系统的意义和作用,促进人类学和民族学的研究; 同时,亦可深入理解创作者和诗歌对读者情绪和认知的影响,为挖掘诗歌作为一种情感表达和心理治疗工具的潜力提供理论支撑。
Abstract:
Anthropological poetry is a new form of literature. Chinese scholars often conflate anthropological poetry with ethnographic poetry, so the emergence and definition of anthropological poetry should be clarified first. Secondly, the evolution of “poetics” and its interconnection with “empathy” in anthropological poetics contribute to the theoretical analysis of anthropological poetry. Finally, summarizing the characteristics of anthropological poetry, such as its return to the primitive, manifestation of the natural, incorporation of the “other culture” concept, coexistence of scientific and humanistic rationality, and “counter-discourse” characteristic,will help to reveal the significance and role of poetry as a cultural tradition and symbolic system and facilitate research on anthropology and ethnology. Meanwhile, a deeper understanding of the impact of poetry and its creators on readers' emotions and cognition can provide theoretical support for exploring the potential of poetry as a tool for emotional expression and psychological therapy.

参考文献/References:

[1]PRATTIS J I. Anthropological poetics: reflections on a new perspective [J]. Dialectical anthropology,1985,10(1/2): 107-117.
[2]庄孔韶.人类学通论 [M]. 3版.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2016:4.
[3]庄孔韶. 不浪费的人类学:诗的参与和传达 [J]. 淮阴师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版),1998(2):45.
[4]乔治 E 马尔库塞,米开尔 M J 费彻尔. 作为文化批评的人类学: 一个人文学科的实验时代[M]. 王铭铭,蓝达居,译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1998:16.
[5]伍蠡甫,林骧华. 现代西方文论选[M]. 上海:上海译文出版社,1983:4.
[6]伊万·布莱迪. 人类学诗学[M].徐鲁亚,等译. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010.
[7]徐杰舜,叶舒宪.人类学与文学的互动:人类学学者访谈录之十二[J].广西民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2001(5):20-26.
[8]MASCIA-LEES F E,SHARPE P. Culture, power, and text: anthropology and literature confront each “other” [J]. American literary history, 1992,4(4):678-696.
[9]HYMES D. An ethnographic perspective [J]. New literary history,1973, 5(1):187-201.
[10]PREMINGER A,BROGAN T V F. The new Princeton encyclopedia of poetry and poetics[M]. Princeton:Princeton University Press,1993:929-930.
[11]范劲.“诗学”和先锋精神:模糊性的理论价值[J].上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013,42(6):78-84.
[12]C 荣格. 探索心灵奥秘的现代人 [M]. 黄奇铭,译. 北京:社会科学文献出版社,1987: 118.
[13]胡志红.生态文学:缘起、界定、创作原则及其前景[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2021,42(11):180-188.
[14]HUGHES L K,ROBBINS S R, TAYLOR A. Transatlantic anglophone literatures, 1776-1920: an anthology[M]. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2022:703.
[15]弗朗兹·博厄斯. 人类学与现代生活 [M]. 刘莎,谭晓勤,张卓宏,译. 北京:华夏出版社,1999:131.
[16]埃德蒙德·胡塞尔. 欧洲科学危机和超验现象学[M]. 张庆熊,译. 上海:上海译文出版社,1988: 5.
[17]马雷特. 人类学[M]. 吕叔湘,译.上海:商务印书馆,1931:2.
[18]BUD R,GREENHALGH P,JAMES F, et al. Being modern: the cultural impact of science in the early twentieth century[M]. London: UCL Press, 2018: 80.
[19]约翰·伯格.观看之道[M]. 戴行钺,译. 桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2015:4.
[20]ROSALDO R. The day of Shelly's death:the poetry and ethnography of grief[M]. Durhan: Duke University Press,2014: 108.
[21]CASTEJON V, COLE A, HAAG O, et al. Ngapartji ngapartji: in turn, in turn: ego-histoire, Europe and indigenous Australia [M]. Canberra: Australian National University Press,2014: 231.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:迟欣,文学博士,温州大学外国语学院教授、硕士研究生导师。
基金项目:国家社会科学基金重大项目“认知诗学研究与理论版图重构”(20&ZD291)。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01