[1]郑泽宇.农村人居环境整治政策的规制逻辑和更新路径——基于政策文本的制度语法学分析[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2024,25(01):66-78.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2024.01.007]
　Zheng Zeyu.The Regulatory Logic and Renewal Path of Policies for the Improvement of Rural Living Environment: An Institutional Grammar Analysis Based on Policy Texts[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2024,25(01):66-78.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2024.01.007]
点击复制

农村人居环境整治政策的规制逻辑和更新路径——基于政策文本的制度语法学分析()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第25卷
期数:
2024年01期
页码:
66-78
栏目:
经济·管理学研究
出版日期:
2024-02-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Regulatory Logic and Renewal Path of Policies for the Improvement of Rural Living Environment: An Institutional Grammar Analysis Based on Policy Texts
作者:
郑泽宇
Author(s):
Zheng Zeyu
关键词:
农村人居环境;  整治政策;  规制逻辑;  制度语法学
Keywords:
rural living environment;  regulatory policy;  regulatory logic;  institutional grammar
分类号:
D422.6
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2024.01.007
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
作为深入实施乡村振兴战略和新时代建设宜居宜业和美乡村的重要任务,中国农村人居环境整治政策体系日益完善。为了解相关政策的规制逻辑和治理效能,系统运用制度语法学工具、辅以制度类型学方法对选定的农村人居环境整治政策样本进行分析。结果表明,农村人居环境整治政策具有身份规则、边界规则、选择规则、信息规则、聚合规则和报酬规则等特征。其中,实施层面主体地位和权责缺乏清晰界定、技术型主体准入规则缺失、政策弱规制性、实施层面主体自下而上信息反馈路径缺失、村民等主体的非决策性、激励机制的制度设计未向下延展等问题较为突出。针对上述问题,未来应从完善实施层面主体权责规定、明确技术型主体参与治理的选拔程序、增强规则性陈述、健全自下而上的信息反馈路径、赋予实施层面主体以行动决策者地位、促进多主体行为正负激励机制结构化等方面,不断提高农村人居环境整治政策实施的实效性。
Abstract:
As an important task for the in-depth implementation of the rural revitalization strategy and the construction of a livable, workable and beautiful countryside in the new era, China's policy system of rural living environment improvement has been increasingly perfected in recent years. In order to understand the regulatory logic and governance effectiveness of the relevant policies, this paper systematically analyzes the selected samples of rural living environment policies by using the tool of institutional grammar, supplemented by institutional typology method. The results show that the governance policies of rural living environment are characterized by identity rules, boundary rules, choice rules, information rules, aggregation rules and remuneration rules. Among them, there exist prominent problems such as the lack of a clear definition of the status, rights and responsibilities of the subjects at the implementation level, the absence of access rules for technical subjects, the weak regulatory nature of policies, the absence of bottom-up information feedback paths for the subjects at the implementation level, the non-decision-making nature of the subjects such as villagers, and the failure of the institutional design of incentives to be extended downward. In view of the above problems, the effectiveness of policy implementation for the continuous improvement of rural living environment should be improved in the future by perfecting the rights and responsibilities of the subjects at the implementation level, clarifying the selection procedures of technical subjects to participate in the governance, enhancing the statement of rules, improving the bottom-up information feedback paths, granting decision-making authority to subjects at the implementation level, facilitating the structuring of incentive mechanism for both positive and negative behaviours of multiple subjects, and so on.

参考文献/References:

[1]李伯华,刘沛林,窦银娣.乡村人居环境系统的自组织演化机理研究[J].经济地理,2014,34(9):130-136.
[2]李裕瑞,曹丽哲,王鹏艳,等.论农村人居环境整治与乡村振兴[J].自然资源学报,2022,37(1):96-109.
[3]李裕瑞,张轩畅,陈秧分,等.人居环境质量对乡村发展的影响:基于江苏省村庄抽样调查截面数据的分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2020,30(8):158-167.
[4]陈绍芳,王春福.论公共政策效能的衰减机制[J].浙江社会科学,2012(3):56-62.
[5]王宾,于法稳.“十四五”时期推进农村人居环境整治提升的战略任务[J].改革,2021(3):111-120.
[6]刘海燕,孙佳慧,申琳,等.河北省农村人居环境整治效果及提升策略[J].河北农业科学,2022,26(4):9-14.
[7] CRAWFORD S E S,OSTROM E.A grammar of institutions[J].American political science review,1995,89(3):582-600.
[8]李文钊.制度多样性的政治经济学:埃莉诺·奥斯特罗姆的制度理论研究[J].学术界,2016(10):223-237.
[9]OSTROME.Understanding institutional diversity[M].Princeton,NJ:Princeton University Press,2005.
[10]李文钊.制度分析与发展框架:传统、演进与展望[J].甘肃行政学院学报,2016(6):4-18.
[11]SIDDIKI S,FRANTZC.The institutional grammar in policy process research[J].Policy studies journal,2022,50(2):299-314.
[12]LIEN A M,SCHLAGER E,LONA A.Using institutional grammar to improve understanding of the form and function of payment for ecosystem services programs[J].Ecosystem services,2018,31:21-31.
[13]SIDDIKI S,BASURTO X,WEIBLE C M.Using the institutional grammar tool to understand regulatory compliance:the case of Colorado aquaculture[J].Regulation & governance,2012,6(2):167-188.
[14]王洛忠,都梦蝶.环境政策中的规制机制:基于“限塑令”的制度语法学分析[J].中国行政管理,2020(5):79-85.
[15]郑泽宇,陈德敏.生活垃圾分类政策的功能轮廓与制度规则:以市级地方条例为样本的制度语法学分析[J].中国行政管理,2021(7):112-118.
[16]周成,钱再见.中国碳达峰碳中和的政策路径:基于扎根理论和制度语法学的双重分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2022,32(11):19-29.
[17]FRANTZ C K,SIDDIKIS.Institutional Grammar 2.0:a specification for encoding and analyzing institutional design[J].Public administration,2021,99(2):222-247.
[18]林迪芬.探究制度的结构和内容:制度语法工具研究述评[J].公共管理评论,2021,3(3):141-159.
[19]宋国恺,李岩.村民主体视角下农村人居环境问题成因及整治路径分析[J].福建论坛(人文社会科学版),2020(2):191-200.
[20]韩万渠,董欣欣.协商参与嵌入政策体系:基层政策执行困境的破解路径[J].学习与实践,2020(2):96-105.
[21]阴训法.论技术主体的社会建构[J].自然辩证法研究,2005,21(7):42-46.
[22]吴柳芬.农村人居环境治理的演进脉络与实践约制[J].学习与探索,2022(6):34-43.
[23]叶娟丽,马骏.公共行政中的街头官僚理论[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003,56(5):612-618.
[24]刘泉,陈宇.我国农村人居环境建设的标准体系研究[J].城市发展研究,2018,25(11):30-36.
[25]齐琦,周静,王绪龙,等.基层组织嵌入农村人居环境治理:理论契合、路径选择与改革方向[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版),2021,38(2):128-136.
[26]陈家建,边慧敏,邓湘树.科层结构与政策执行[J].社会学研究,2013,28(6):1-20.
[27]李永忠.论公共政策信息的特性、类型及作用[J].中国行政管理,2011(7):63-65.
[28]俞海山,周亚越.公共政策何以失败?一个基于政策主体角度的解释模型[J].浙江社会科学,2022(3):34-40.
[29]闫春华.农村人居环境整治中的主体认知差异及其行动约制[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2023,23(2):65-73.
[30]田孟,孙敏.农村人居环境整治自治模式研究:以村民理事会为例[J].中国特色社会主义研究,2021,12(3):85-94.
[31]张莉.财政规则与国家治理能力建设:以环境治理为例[J].中国社会科学,2020(8):47-63.
[32]孟小燕.基于结构方程的居民生活垃圾分类行为研究[J].资源科学,2019,41(6):1111-1119.
[33]姜利娜,赵霞.制度环境如何影响村民的生活垃圾分类意愿:基于京津冀三省市村民的实证考察[J].经济社会体制比较,2021(5):139-151.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:郑泽宇,法学博士,山东科技大学文法学院讲师。
基金项目:国家社会科学基金西部项目“生活垃圾分类与资源化利用的法律规制研究”(20XFX019)。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01