[1]孙琳.加剧与缓解:我国基层法院人案矛盾之再审视——以A市F区法院院庭长办案制度为视角[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2023,24(06):32-44.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2023.06.004]
　Sun Lin.Aggravation and Alleviation: A Re-examination of the Contradiction Between Personnel and Cases in China's Grassroots Courts: From the Perspective of the System of Case Handling by Director and Chief Judge of the Court in District F, City A[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2023,24(06):32-44.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2023.06.004]
点击复制

加剧与缓解:我国基层法院人案矛盾之再审视——以A市F区法院院庭长办案制度为视角()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第24卷
期数:
2023年06期
页码:
32-44
栏目:
政治·法学研究
出版日期:
2023-11-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Aggravation and Alleviation: A Re-examination of the Contradiction Between Personnel and Cases in China's Grassroots Courts: From the Perspective of the System of Case Handling by Director and Chief Judge of the Court in District F, City A
作者:
孙琳
Author(s):
Sun Lin
关键词:
院庭长办案;  人案矛盾;  员额制改革;  基层法院
Keywords:
case handling by director and chief judge of the court;  the contradiction between personnel and cases;  reform of the post system;  grassroots courts
分类号:
D916.2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2023.06.004
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
院庭长办案制度的常态化运行对提升审判组织办案质效、缓解基层法院人案矛盾具有重要的理论价值和实践意义。实证研究表明,当前法院院庭长办案虽然已实现“制度化”,但院庭长入额比例高且办理的案件以参审案件、简单案件为主,其带来的直接后果是加剧了基层法院的人案矛盾。究其根源,客观方面表现为,院庭长办案制度考核标准有待细化、院庭长分案机制有待完善和缺乏刚性的监督机制; 主观方面表现为,院庭长没时间办案、不敢办案和不重视办案。因此,基层法院为缓解人案矛盾,亟须建立系统性、可操作性的院庭长办案长效机制。以院庭长办案制度为视角审视当前基层法院面临的人案矛盾,旨在为我国基层法院推动员额制改革、推动审判权运行机制改革以及优化司法资源,缓解人案矛盾提供新思路。
Abstract:
The normalized operation of the system of case handling by director and chief judge of the court has important theoretical value and practical significance to improve the quality and efficiency of trial organizations and alleviate the contradiction between personnel and cases in China's grassroots courts. Empirical research shows that, despite the current “institutionalized” case handling by director and chief judge of the court, they have a high proportion of posts and focus more on trial participation and simple cases. The direct consequence is to aggravate the contradiction between personnel and cases. At its root, the objective aspects are manifested in the need for the refinement of evaluation criteria for system of case handling by director and chief judge, the improvement of the allocation system of cases to the director and chief judge of the court, and the lack of a rigid supervision mechanism; subjectively, it is manifested by the lack of time for case handling by director and chief judge, reluctance to handle cases, and a lack of emphasis on case handling. Therefore, in order to alleviate the contradiction between personnel and cases, the grassroots courts urgently need to establish a systematic and operable long-term mechanism of case handling by director and chief judge. The purpose of this study is to provide new ideas for China's grassroots courts to promote the reform of the post system, the reform of the trial power operation mechanism, and the optimization of judicial resources, so as to alleviate the contradiction between personnel and cases.

参考文献/References:

[1]程金华.法院“案多人少”的跨国比较:对美国、日本和中国的实证分析[J].社会科学辑刊,2022(5):72-84.
[2]任重.“案多人少”的成因与出路:对本轮民事诉讼法修正之省思[J].法学评论,2022,40(2):138-141.
[3]胡学军.系统论视角下“案多人少”的应对之道[J].法治研究,2022(3):100-110.
[4]张卫平.“案多人少”问题的非讼应对[J].江西社会科学,2022,42(1):57-70.
[5]李浩.院庭长办案与员额制改革[J].江海学刊,2018(5):157-163.
[6]李阳.向着新时代砥砺奋进:从中央政法工作会议看全面深化司法体制改革建设更高水平法治中国[N].人民法院报,2018-01-24(1).
[7]龙宗智,孙海龙,张琼.落实院庭长办案制度[J].四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018(4):147-159.
[8]陈瑞华.司法体制改革导论[M].北京:法律出版社,2018:267.
[9]冯之东.司法改革背景下法院院庭长办案制度实践调查[J].南华大学学报(社会科学版),2017,18(5):32-47.
[10]刘文涛.困境与出路:院庭长办案制度实证研究:基于A市实证考察[J].南海法学,2021,5(2):71-80.
[11]安徽省高级人民法院民四庭.完善院、庭长参加合议庭办案制度对策和建议[J].中国审判,2007(5):54-56.
[12]李新亮.人民法庭庭长办案机制中的审管分离[J].人民司法,2015(17):9-13.
[13]项天伦.回归法官本色:院、庭长办案制度的审视与完善[C]// 最高人民法院.司法体制综合配套改革与刑事审判问题研究:全国法院第30届学术讨论会获奖论文集:上.北京:人民法院出版社,2019:9.
[14]徐卉.法院人案失衡,改革要动真格[N].上海法治报,2022-12-09(B7).
[15]左卫民.强化院庭长办案的“量、质、责”[N].人民法院报,2017-04-10(2).
[16]林娜.如何走出院庭长办案的困境:兼论我国审判权运行机制改革试点方案的补强[J].法律适用,2015(11):30-34.
[17]刘艳红.人工智能技术在智慧法院建设中实践运用与前景展望[J].比较法研究,2022(1):1-11.
[18]陈瑞华.司法改革的理论反思[J].苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016,37(1):56-64.
[19]高可.论法官的自我实现与实现自我[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2023,24(3):28-36.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:孙琳,中国社会科学院大学博士研究生。
基金项目:国家社会科学基金重大项目“刑事诉讼中的财产权保护系统研究”(18ZDA144)。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01