[1]高诚刚.骗取贷款罪立法修改与司法适用检视—以249份骗取贷款罪判决书为分析样本[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2022,23(03):13-22.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2022.03.002]
　Gao Chenggang.On Legislation Amendment and Judicial Application of the Crime of Obtaining Loans by Fraudulent Means: An Analysis of 249 Convictions for the Crime[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2022,23(03):13-22.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2022.03.002]
点击复制

骗取贷款罪立法修改与司法适用检视—以249份骗取贷款罪判决书为分析样本()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第23卷
期数:
2022年03期
页码:
13-22
栏目:
政治·法学研究
出版日期:
2022-03-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
On Legislation Amendment and Judicial Application of the Crime of Obtaining Loans by Fraudulent Means: An Analysis of 249 Convictions for the Crime
作者:
高诚刚
Author(s):
Gao Chenggang
关键词:
《刑法修正案(十一)》;  骗取贷款罪;  其他严重情节;  立法修改;  法律适用
Keywords:
Amendment(XI)to the Criminal Law;  the crime of obtaining loans by fraudulent means;  other serious circumstances;  legislation amendment;  judicial application
分类号:
DF611; D924.33
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2022.03.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
《刑法修正案(十一)》对骗取贷款罪的入罪条件进行了限缩修正,删去“或者有其他严重情节的”规定,这是骗取贷款罪立法上的进步,值得肯定。推动《刑法修正案(十一)》对该罪进行修正的原因可从现实需要和理论促进两个维度展开分析。鉴于《刑法修正案(十一)》正式施行时间较短,笔者仅选取249份骗取贷款罪公开文书为样本做实证分析,认为立法修正后骗取贷款罪的司法适用需更加审慎地处理好认定问题,即要合理界定本罪的保护法益、注意把握本罪的犯罪构成以及恰当定性“给银行或者其他金融机构造成重大损失”,这样才能在取得较好司法成效的同时,推动我国社会主义市场经济合规、持续和健康发展。
Abstract:
Amendment(XI)to the Criminal Law has limited the incriminating conditions of the crime of obtaining loans by fraudulent means, deleting the provision of “or other serious circumstances”, which is a progress in the legislation of the crime of obtaining loans by fraudulent means and worthy of affirmation. The reasons for the revision of the crime in Amendment(XI)to the Criminal Law can be analyzed from two dimensions of practical need and theoretical promotion. In view of the short period of the official implementation of Amendment(XI)to the Criminal Law, only 249 public documents of the crime of obtaining loans by fraudulent means are selected as samples for empirical analysis. The judicial application of the crime of obtaining loans by fraudulent means after the legislative amendment should deal with the identification more prudently, that is, the protection interests of this crime should be defined reasonably, the criminal constitution of this crime should be grasped and “causing heavy losses to banks or other financial institutions” should be defined properly, so as to achieve better judicial results, in the meanwhile, promote the policy abiding, sustainable and healthy development of China's socialist market economy.

参考文献/References:

[1]高诚刚.自我答责基准下骗取贷款行为的出罪认定[J].浙江工商大学学报,2017(1):44-50.
[2]张明楷.刑法学:上册[M].5版.北京:法律出版社,2016:52-53.
[3]王志远,张玮琦.骗取贷款罪的罪质与适用:以信用风险为核心的考察[J].江西社会科学,2021,41(5):192-207.
[4]高诚刚.刑法谦抑性的理解与适用[J].江西警察学院学报,2015(3):85-89.
[5]孙国祥.序(一)[M]//马春晓.经济刑法的法益研究.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2020:3.
[6]克劳斯·罗克辛.法益讨论的新发展[J].许丝捷,译.月旦法学杂志,2012(12):257-280.
[7]张明楷.骗取贷款罪的保护法益及其运用[J].当代法学,2020,34(1):50-65.
[8]肖中华.骗取贷款罪的司法困境及立法完善建议[J].法治研究,2020(6):36-42.
[9]张小宁.骗取贷款罪节制适用的背景及路径[J].东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,22(5):80-90.
[10]陈少青.罪量与可罚性[J].中国刑事法杂志,2017(1):42-62.
[11]周铭川.论骗取贷款罪的行为构造:兼与张明楷教授、孙国祥教授商榷[J].中国刑事法杂志,2020(1):130-147.
[12]张明楷.骗取贷款罪的构造[J].清华法学,2019,13(5):18-35.
[13]林钰雄.新刑法总则[M].3版.台北:元照出版公司,2011:325.
[14]高诚刚.我国经济犯罪司法认定中的出罪事由[J].青海社会科学,2015(4):101-108.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:高诚刚,法学博士,常州大学史良法学院副教授、硕士研究生导师。
基金项目:安徽省哲学社会科学规划一般项目“经济犯罪刑事可罚性理论系统构建与司法证成研究”(AHSKY2019D007)。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01