[1]卢少锋,李梦珂.认罪认罚视野下证据开示制度的实践路径新探——以我国刑事程序“繁简分流”为视角[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2021,22(01):10-19.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2021.01.002]
　Lu Shaofeng,Li Mengke.A New Exploration of the Practice Path of Evidence Discovery System from the Perspective of Confession and Punishment: From the Perspective of“Complicated and Simple Division” in China’s Criminal Procedure[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2021,22(01):10-19.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2021.01.002]
点击复制

认罪认罚视野下证据开示制度的实践路径新探——以我国刑事程序“繁简分流”为视角()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第22卷
期数:
2021年01期
页码:
10-19
栏目:
政治·法学研究
出版日期:
2021-02-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
A New Exploration of the Practice Path of Evidence Discovery System from the Perspective of Confession and Punishment: From the Perspective of“Complicated and Simple Division” in China’s Criminal Procedure
作者:
卢少锋; 李梦珂
Author(s):
Lu Shaofeng; Li Mengke
关键词:
证据开示;  认罪认罚;  繁简分流;  庭审实质化;  实践路径
Keywords:
evidence discovery;  confession and punishment;  complicated and simple division;  substantiation of court trial;  practice path
分类号:
D925.2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2021.01.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
刑事审判程序“繁简分流”是目前我国处理刑事案件的基本趋势,而证据开示制度是充分发挥不同审判程序功能的重要审前保障性程序和机制,在我国具有设立的正当性及现实依据。该制度在英国以及日本等国家已经发展成为一种较为成熟的证据制度,据此结合目前我国的刑事程序“繁简分流”的设置,探讨该程序机制下我国证据开示的制度构建与实践路径,并对是否赋予被告方阅卷权予以探析,以保障其认罪认罚之自愿性与真实性,从而为我国认罪认罚的有效实施提供证据层面保障之新思路。
Abstract:
It is the basic trend of our country to deal with criminal cases with“complicated and simple division”in the criminal trial procedure, and the evidence discovery system is an important pretrial safeguard procedure and mechanism to give full play to the functions of different trial procedures, which has the legitimacy and practical basis for its establishment in China. This system has developed into a relative mature evidence system in Britain, Japan and other countries. Accordingly, combined with the current “complicated and simple diversion” of criminal procedure in China, this paper discusses the system construction and practice path of evidence discovery of China in the procedural mechanism and analyzes whether the defendant has been given the right to read files to ensure the voluntariness and authenticity of confession and punishment, so as to provide a new idea of evidence level guarantee for the effective implementation of confession and punishment in China.

参考文献/References:

[1]龙宗智.刑事诉讼中的证据开示制度研究:上[J].政法论坛,1998(1):3-5.
[2]彼得·G.伦斯特洛姆.美国法律词典[M].贺卫方,樊翠华,刘茂林,等译.北京:中国政法大学出版,1998:156.
[3]孙长永.当事人主义刑事诉讼与证据开示[J].法律科学.西北政法学院学报,2000(4):83-95.
[4]李温.英国检察制度改革的几个问题[J].人民检察,2008(13):57-59.
[5]马方,吴桐.日本刑事证据开示制度发展动向评析及启示[J].证据科学,2018,26(4):491-502.
[6]冀祥德.证据开示·沉默权·辩诉交易关系论:兼评中国司法改革若干问题[J].政法论坛,2006(3):159-167.
[7]詹建红.论契约精神在刑事诉讼中的引入[J].中外法学,2010,22(6):913-927.
[8]郭雁.认罪认罚自愿性问题研究[J].江西警察学院学报,2017(5):106-111.
[9]孙长永.刑事证据开示制度的价值新探[J].人民检察,2009(8):37-40.
[10]熊秋红.刑事证据制度发展中的阶段性进步:刑事证据两个规定评析[J].证据科学,2010,18(5):569-576.
[11]王守安.以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革带来深刻影响[N].检察日报,2014-11-10(3).
[12]徐利英,王峰.关于刑事证据开示制度的思考[J].中国刑事法杂志,2013(9):89-94.
[13]孙长永.探索正当程序:比较刑事诉讼法专论[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2005.
[14]田口守一.刑事诉讼法[M].张凌,于秀峰,译.7版.北京:法律出版社,2019.
[15]张保生.证据法学[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2018:153.
[16]何家弘.证据学论坛:第5卷[M].北京:中国检察出版社,2002:141.
[17]孙谦.检察机关贯彻修改后刑事诉讼法的若干问题[J].国家检察官学院学报,2018,26(6):3-12.
[18]周强.关于在部分地区开展刑事案件认罪认罚从宽制度试点工作情况的中期报告[N].人民法院报,2017-12-24(1).
[19]闵春雷.回归权利:认罪认罚从宽制度的适用困境及理论反思[J].法学杂志,2019,40(12):1-11.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:卢少锋,法学博士,郑州大学法学院副教授、硕士研究生导师; 李梦珂,郑州大学法学院硕士研究生。
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-02-20