[1]曹义孙,李昊舒.一般不动产买受人物权期待权要件分析——兼谈《执行异议复议规定》第二十八条[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2020,21(06):1-9.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2020.06.001]
　Cao Yisun,Li Haoshu.An Analysis of the Requirement of the Anticipation Right of PropertyRight of General Real Estate Purchasers: Remarks on the 28th Article of Regulations of Execution Objection and Reconsideration[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2020,21(06):1-9.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2020.06.001]
点击复制

一般不动产买受人物权期待权要件分析——兼谈《执行异议复议规定》第二十八条()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第21卷
期数:
2020年06期
页码:
1-9
栏目:
政治·法学研究
出版日期:
2020-11-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
An Analysis of the Requirement of the Anticipation Right of PropertyRight of General Real Estate Purchasers: Remarks on the 28th Article of Regulations of Execution Objection and Reconsideration
作者:
曹义孙; 李昊舒
Author(s):
Cao Yisun;  Li Haoshu
关键词:
一般不动产;  期待权;  执行异议
Keywords:
general real estate;  anticipation right;  execution objection
分类号:
D920.5; D925.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2020.06.001
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
《执行异议复议规定》对一般不动产买受人物权期待权,已经有了相对明确的规定。笔者结合《九民纪要》的相关内容,对2017年至2020年中国裁判文书网上公开的一般不动产买受人基于物权期待权而提出执行异议的案件进行分析后发现:因目前并未有和物权期待权理论相适应的立法方案及规则体系,以及实务实践中案件情况较为错综复杂,导致《执行异议复议规定》第二十八条在适用时会面临诸多困境。现尝试从分析一般不动产买受人物权期待权概念、性质及立法现状入手,结合相关案例,对《执行异议复议规定》第二十八条构成要件及其适用进行思考探讨。
Abstract:
The Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues Concerning the Handling of Cases of Execution Objection and Reconsideration(hereinafter referred to as Regulations of Execution Objection and Reconsideration)have relatively clear provisions regarding the anticipation right of property right of general real estate purchasers. Based on the relevant contents of the Minutes of the National Court Civil and Commercial Trial Work Conference(the Ninth)(hereinafter referred to as the Jiumin Minutes), through the analysis of cases of execution objection filed by general real estate purchasers according to the anticipation right of property right published in China Judgment Online from 2017 to 2020, it is found out that currently, there is no legislative plan and rule system compatible with the theory of the anticipation right of property right, and the case situation in practice is complicated, which leads to the difficult application of the 28th Article of Regulations of Execution Objection and Reconsideration. Starting with the concept, nature and legislative status quo of the anticipation right of property right of general real estate purchasers, combined with relevant cases, the constituent elements of the 28th Article of Regulations of Execution Objection and Reconsideration and their application are reflected and discussed.

参考文献/References:

[1]郭润直.民法概说[M].首尔:博英社,1998:87.
[2]韦剑.买房人物权期待权与排除执行问题分析[EB/OL].(2019-03-07)
[2020-06-15]. http://article.chinalawinfo.com/Space/SpaceArticleDetail.aspx?AID=109863&AuthorId=153176&Type=1.
[3]沈烨.不动产物权期待权的性质及成立条件[N].上海法治报,2017-11-22(B06).
[4]王泽鉴.民法学说与判例研究:第7册[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1998:59.
[5]王睿.期待权类型化研究[M].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学出版社,2018:145.
[6]王泽鉴.民法学说与判例研究:第1册[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1998:147.
[7]申卫星.期待权基本理论研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006:41.
[8]施建红.不动产买受人得排除强制执行的法律适用[J].人民司法,2014(10):107-111.
[9]朴常赫.论韩国民法对不动产二重买卖中第一买受人权益的保护[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2013,14(4):15-18.
[10]最高人民法院民事审判第二庭.《全国法院民商事审判工作会议纪要》理解与适用[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2019:643.
[11]江必新,刘贵祥.最高人民法院关于人民法院办理执行异议和复议案件若干问题的规定理解与适用[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2015:424-425.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:曹义孙,中国政法大学法学院教授、博士研究生导师; 李昊舒,常州大学史良法学院硕士研究生。基金项目:国家社会科学基金重点项目“良法善治视域下法治与德治关系研究”(15AZX021)。
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-11-20