[1]尹毅,葛蓝.赋权·增能·法治:校园欺凌治理的理想图景[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2020,21(05):23-32.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2020.05.003]
　Yin Yi,Ge Lan.Empowerment, Energizing and Ruling: The Ideal Prospect of the Governance of School Bullying[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2020,21(05):23-32.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2020.05.003]
点击复制

赋权·增能·法治:校园欺凌治理的理想图景()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第21卷
期数:
2020年05期
页码:
23-32
栏目:
政治·法学研究
出版日期:
2020-10-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Empowerment, Energizing and Ruling: The Ideal Prospect of the Governance of School Bullying
作者:
尹毅; 葛蓝
Author(s):
Yin Yi; Ge Lan
关键词:
校园欺凌;  治理;  法治
Keywords:
school bullying;  governance;  the rule of law
分类号:
D922.16
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2020.05.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
新时代的校园欺凌治理已经上升为国家意志与政府行动,一方面在运动式的专项治理过程中总结防治经验、形成工作模式,另一方面在分散型的法律体系内容中进行法理论证、探寻规制路径。校园欺凌治理的法律的空白与规则缺位,使其在实践中遭遇了学校“介入无门”与“权小责大”的法制困境,继而在从“政策议题”过渡至“法律命题”转换过程中,需要借助于法的威权及强制力,赋予校园欺凌治理的策略和方法以合法性,明晰各类相关责任主体的角色扮演、权力分配与能力需求。通过专项立法、有序衔接,实现校园欺凌依法治理; 强调学校为主、多元协同,推进校园欺凌综合治理; 依靠配套机制、纠偏持正,实施校园欺凌精准治理。这些都是建构校园欺凌治理制度框架的有效途径。
Abstract:
The governance of school bullying has risen to the national will and government action. On the one hand, it summarizes the prevention and control experience and forms a working model in the movement-type special governance process. On the other hand, it expounds jurisprudence and explores regulations and paths in the content of the decentralized legal system. The legal blankness and regulatory absence of school bullying have caused the legal dilemma of “intervention without reason” and “little power but great responsibility” in governance practices, then in the transition from “policy issue” to “legal proposition”, the authoritative power of law and its coercive force are needed to give legitimacy to the strategies and methods of school bullying governance, to clarify the role play, power distribution and ability requirements of various relevant responsible subjects. Through special legislation and orderly connection, school bullying can be governed according to the law. Emphasizing the main body of the school and diversified cooperation to promote the comprehensive management of school bullying and relying on supporting mechanisms and correcting bias to improve the precise management of school bullying are effective ways to construct the framework of school bullying governance system.

参考文献/References:

[1] BROOKMEYER K A,FANTI K A,HENRICH C C.Schools,parents,and youth violence:a multilevel,ecological analysis[J].Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology,2006(4):504-514.
[2]United Nations Educational,Scientific and Cultural Organization.Behind the numbers:ending school violence and bullying[R].Pairs:United Nations Educational,Scientifc and Cultural Organization,2019:12.
[3]姚建龙.防治学生欺凌的中国路径:对近期治理校园欺凌政策之评析[J].中国青年社会科学,2017,36(1):19-25.
[4]教育部等十一部门关于印发《加强中小学生欺凌综合治理方案》的通知[EB/OL].(2017-11-22)[2020-01-15].http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A11/moe_1789/201712/t20171226_322701.html.
[5]徐久生,徐隽颖.“校园暴力”与“校园欺凌”概念重塑[J].青少年犯罪问题,2018(6):44-52.
[6]张宝书.英国中小学反校园欺凌政策探析[J].比较教育研究,2016,38(11):1-8.
[7]林鸿潮.论学校安全立法及其制度框架[J].教育研究,2011,32(8):13-19.
[8]李婉楠.校园欺凌现象的犯罪学评价及预防路径[J].重庆交通大学学报(社会科学版),2016,16(4):15-19.
[9]SMITH P K,MORITA Y,JUNGER-TAS J,et al.The nature of school bullying:a cross-national perspective[M].London:Routledge Press,1998.
[10]胡增瑞.校园欺凌行为的刑法规制[J].青少年犯罪问题,2019(1):58-65.
[11]尹力.我国校园欺凌治理的制度缺失与完善[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,38(4):101-107.
[12]孙国东.转型中国的法治研究[M].上海:格致出版社,2016:48.
[13]张文显.法理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2011:58.
[14]张茂聪,李玉蛟.校园欺凌惩戒权的理性回归[J].教育科学研究,2020(1):60-65.
[15]KITSANTAS A,WARE H W.Students' perceptions of school safety:effects by community,school environment,and substance use variables[J].Journal of early adolescence,2004(4):412-430.
[16]任海涛.我国校园欺凌法治体系的反思与重构:兼评11部门《加强中小学生欺凌综合治理方案》[J].东方法学,2019(1):123-133.
[17]DEFARGES P M.La governance,que sais-je.No.3676[M].Paris:Presses Universitaires de France,2003:45-46.
[18]托马·穆里埃斯.协同治理:读菲利浦·莫罗·德法尔日著作的笔记[M].陈力川,译//乐黛云.跨文化对话:第18辑.南京:江苏人民出版社,2006:69.
[19]向广宇,闻志强.日本校园欺凌现状、防治经验与启示:以《校园欺凌防止对策推进法》为主视角[J].大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2017,38(1):1-10.
[20]麦克·卡西迪.远离校园欺凌:你该怎么做[M].雷秀云,译.上海:上海交通大学出版社,2018:116.
[21]防治学生欺凌暴力 建设阳光安全校园:国务院教育督导委员会办公室2019年第5号预警[EB/OL].(2019-08-23)[2020-01-15].http://www.moe.gov.cn/s78/A11/moe_767/201908/t20190823_395632.html.
[22]冯一平.德国:治理校园暴力,预防措施必须到位[J].人民教育,2016(11):26-27.
[23]CCSSO.Education commission of the states unveil state k-12 school safety comparison resources[EB/OL].(2019-02-25)[2020-01-15].https://www.ecs.org /50-state-comparison-k-12-school-safety.
[24]哈耶克.通往奴役之路[M].王明毅,冯兴元,马雪芹,等译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1997:94.
[25]林斌.英国防治校园霸凌法制之研究:教育治理之观点[J].教育经营与管理研究集刊,2013(9):1-29.
[26]特伦斯·鲍尔,理查德·贝拉米.剑桥二十世纪政治思想史[M].任军锋,徐卫翔,译.北京:商务印书馆,2016:17-19.
[27]教育部青少年法治教育协同创新中心(华东师范大学),华东师范大学法学院.校园欺凌治理的跨学科对话[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2017,35(2):12-23.
[28]赵亭亭.我国校园欺凌问题的现状、成因及防治:基于两次校园欺凌论坛的会议综述[J].当代青年研究,2018(6):81-85.
[29]崔总合,吕武.新世纪以来美国校园欺凌治理的进展、经验与启示[J].教学与管理,2018(36):114-117.
[30]杨文杰,范国睿.美国中小学校园安全治理审思[J].全球教育展望,2019,48(8):3-17.
[31]PENFOLD C,CLEGHORN N,TENNANT R.Department for children,schools and families[J].Journal of poverty & social justice,2009,17(3):295-297.
[32]杨廷乾,接园,高文涛.加拿大安大略省校园预防欺凌计划研究[J].比较教育研究,2016,38(4):62-65.

相似文献/References:

[1]孙东河.试论公民社会视域中的新型社区治理 — — 以常州兆丰花苑等社区为例[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2009,10(04):25.
　SUN Do ng- he.On New Community Governance from the Angle of Civil Society: Taking Zhaofeng Community in Changzhou as an Example[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2009,10(05):25.
[2]罗恒.论中国式治理语境下刑事政策现代化——以刑法观融合为路径[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2024,25(02):29.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2024.02.004]
　Luo Heng.The Modernization of Criminal Policy in the Contextof Chinese-style Governance: The Path of Integrating Criminal Law Concepts[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2024,25(05):29.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2024.02.004]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:尹毅,常州大学艺术学院讲师; 葛蓝,江苏省社科联助理研究员,安徽大学法学院硕士研究生。
基金项目:国家社会科学基金一般项目“公民有序政治参与中的协商民主机制研究”(16BZZ024); 江苏省哲学社会科学基金一般项目“群体性事件化解中的协商民主机制研究”(15MLB008)。
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-10-15