[1]殷洁,何煊.论有限责任公司清算义务人范围的法律适用及立法完善[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2020,21(05):1-10.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2020.05.001]
　Yin Jie,He Xuan.On the Legal Application and Legislative Improvement of the Liquidation Obligor Range of Limited Liability Companies[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2020,21(05):1-10.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2020.05.001]
点击复制

论有限责任公司清算义务人范围的法律适用及立法完善()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第21卷
期数:
2020年05期
页码:
1-10
栏目:
政治·法学研究
出版日期:
2020-10-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
On the Legal Application and Legislative Improvement of the Liquidation Obligor Range of Limited Liability Companies
作者:
殷洁; 何煊
Author(s):
Yin Jie; He Xuan
关键词:
公司清算;  《民法典》;  清算义务人;  受信义务
Keywords:
company liquidation;  The Civil Code;  liquidation obligor;  fiduciary obligation
分类号:
D922.291.91
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2020.05.001
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
《公司法》及其司法解释就清算义务人制度做出了规定,然而相关法条在清算责任承担方面的模糊性,导致司法实践中频繁出现对部分股东判罚过重的现象。这种现象在《全国法院民商事审判工作会议纪要》中得到纠正。《民法总则》和新通过的《民法典》在清算义务人方面做出了与《公司法》及其司法解释不同的规定,即明确“法人的董事、理事等执行机构或者决策机构的成员为清算义务人”,故有限责任公司清算义务人范围如何正确适用法律值得探讨。《民法典》与《公司法》为一般法与特别法关系,仅在穷尽搜寻商事特别法规范而无门时方可适用《民法典》规定。此外,建议在司法实务中基于股东、董事、高管的不同受信义务,合理界定有限责任公司的清算义务人范围,应在《民法典》司法解释中确立清算义务人概念,并于《公司法》中重新确定其范围与职责。
Abstract:
The Company Law and its judicial interpretations stipulate the liquidation obligor system. However, the ambiguity of relevant laws and regulations regarding the responsibility for liquidation has led to the frequent occurrences of excessive penalties imposed on some shareholders in judicial practices and was later corrected in Minutes. General Rules of the Civil Law of the People's Republic of China and newly adopted The Civil Code have provisions on the liquidation obligor different from the The Company Law and its judicial interpretation, that is, “members of executive bodies or decision-making bodies such as directors and directors of legal persons are liquidation obligors”, so it is worth discussing how to apply the law correctly to the liquidation obligor range of limited liability companies. The Civil Code and The Company Law embody the relationship of general law and special law, and the provisions of The Civil Code can only be applied when there is no match after an exhaustive search for special commercial law norms. In addition, it is recommended that in judicial practices, based on the different fiduciary obligations of shareholders, directors, and executives, the liquidation obligor range of limited liability companies be reasonably defined, the concept of liquidation obligor be established in the judicial interpretation of The Civil Code, and its range and responsibilities be redefined in The Company Law.

参考文献/References:

[1] 钱玉林.公司法总则的再生[J].环球法律评论,2019,41(4):5-20.
[2]史尚宽,张谷校.民法总论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2000:201.
[3]冯果.公司法要论[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2003:246-247.
[4]钱玉林.民法总则与公司法的适用关系论[J].法学研究,2018,40(3):51-65.
[5]王利明.民商合一体例下我国民法典总则的制定[J].法商研究,2015,32(4):3-9.
[6]刘怿.论有限责任公司股东的清算责任[J].中国商论,2019(10):136-140.
[7]梁上上.有限公司股东清算义务人地位质疑[J].中国法学,2019(2):260-278.
[8]张俊勇,翟如意.有限责任公司清算义务人主体问题研究[J].法律适用,2019(19):88-94.
[9]王长华.论有限责任公司清算义务人的界定:以我国《民法总则》第七十条的适用为分析视角[J].法学杂志,2018,39(8):89-97.
[10]王威,聂勉.有限责任公司清算义务人范围界定:基于股东和债权人保护双重视角[J].鄂州大学学报,2019,26(6):11-13.
[11]郑银.公司清算义务人主体范围再界定[J].西南政法大学学报,2017,19(6):110-120.
[12]蒙瑞.公司清算义务人责任制度逻辑分析与实务争议探讨[J].江汉论坛,2017(4):134-139.
[13]李建伟.公司清算义务人基本问题研究[J].北方法学,2010,4(2):67-75.
[14]施天涛.公司法论[M].北京:法律出版社,2018.
[15]朱慈蕴,LIAO Z Y.对股东诚信义务的再思考[J].中国法律,2007(4):9-11.
[16]任慧.论封闭公司中股东的受信义务[J].西南石油大学学报(社会科学版),2015,17(1):62-68.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:殷洁,法学博士,上海对外经贸大学法学院教授、硕士研究生导师; 何煊,上海对外经贸大学法学院硕士研究生。
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-10-15