[1]阮丽娟,吕鑫童.论环境影响评价机构法律责任的承担与实[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2020,21(04):41-50.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2020.04.005]
　Ruan lijuan,Lyu Xintong.On the Undertaking and Realization of the Legal Responsibilities of Environmental Impact Assessment Institutions[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2020,21(04):41-50.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2020.04.005]
点击复制

论环境影响评价机构法律责任的承担与实()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第21卷
期数:
2020年04期
页码:
41-50
栏目:
环境法专题研究
出版日期:
2020-08-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
On the Undertaking and Realization of the Legal Responsibilities of Environmental Impact Assessment Institutions
作者:
阮丽娟; 吕鑫童
Author(s):
Ruan lijuan; Lyu Xintong
关键词:
环境影响评价机构;  行政追责;  刑事制裁;  侵权连带责任
Keywords:
environmental impact assessment agencies;  administrative accountability;  criminal penalty;  joint liability for tort
分类号:
D912.6
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2020.04.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
环境影响评价机构依法评价直接影响到环境评价制度的有效实施,而强化对环境影响评价机构违法行为的追责可倒逼其依法评价。由于立法上的缺失和执法上的局限性,我国环境影响评价机构并未完全承担与其违法评价相匹配的法律责任。为此,环境影响评价机构应突出其行政处罚信息公开、细化行政处罚的适用情形、精准高效监管与创新监管方式以落实其违法评价的行政追责; 应构建环境行政执法与刑事司法的有效衔接机制以改变以罚代刑的执法传统,进而实现对环境影响评价机构违法评价的刑事追责; 应厘清侵权连带责任的性质、合理设置环境影响评价机构的组织形式以实现其违法评价的侵权责任。
Abstract:
Effective implementation of EIA depends on whether the EIA agencies abide by laws, thus strengthening the accountability for EIA agencies' violations is conducive to their legal evaluations. Due to the lack of legislation and the limitation of law enforcement, the Chinese EIA agencies have not really assumed the legal responsibilities that match the illegal activities of EIA. Therefore, the disclosure of their administrative penalty information should be highlighted, applicable situations of administrative penalty should be refined, efficient supervision should be precise and supervision methods should be innovated in order to implement the administrative accountability for EIA agencies' illegal evaluations. Effective linking mechanism between environmental administrative law enforcement and criminal justice should be constructed to avoid the tradition of replacing criminal penalty with punishment so as to realize the criminal accountability for EIA agencies' illegal evaluations. It is necessary to clarify the nature of joint liability for tort and rationally set up the organizational form of EIA agencies to realize the tort liability of their illegal evaluations.

参考文献/References:

[1]周柯,汪小娟.环评脱钩:我国环境影响评价制度的改革路向[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2015,32(6):62-67.
[2]寇江泽.治污攻坚战 须把住环评关[N].人民日报,2018-04-21(9).
[3]李冰强,武文娟,邓宇冠.环境影响评价机构独立性问题探析[J].晋阳学刊,2018(2):117-123.
[4]李挚萍,李新科.以环评文件质量管理为核心的环评监管法律机制的思考[J].环境保护,2017,45(19):15-19.
[5]颜九红.论环境污染行为之刑事责任阙如[J].北京政法职业学院学报,2009(4):33-39.
[6]孙杰.环境执法中的“以罚代刑”现象及其规制[J].山东社会科学,2017(3):177-184.
[7]白云鹏.环境执法中的“以罚代刑”现象当休矣[J].人民论坛,2017(15):100-101.
[8]王圆圆.行政犯罪既不能“以罚代刑”,也不能“以刑代罚”[J].人民论坛,2016(25):125-127.
[9]李楠,李耀清.以罚代刑的解决机制研究:由最高人民检察院指导性案例第7号引出[J].黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报,2016(1):22-24.
[10]张锋学.行政执法和刑事司法衔接机制研究[J].山东社会科学,2019(1):121-126.
[11]王泽群.完善法律监督机制解决以罚代刑问题[J].人民检察,2010(11):77-78.
[12]杨立新.论不真正连带责任类型体系及规则[J].当代法学,2012,26(3):57-64.
[13]蒋煦涵,谢盛纹.特殊普通合伙制会计师事务所民事责任的配置[J].企业经济,2016,35(2):75-79.
[14]周柯,史一舒.论环境影响评价机构的独立性[J].法治研究,2015(6):135-141.
[15]吴满昌,辛欣.论环评机构的组织形式与连带侵权责任的承担[J].环境保护,2017,45(5):37-41.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:阮丽娟,法学博士,常州大学史良法学院副教授,硕士研究生导师; 吕鑫童,常州大学史良法学院硕士研究生。
基金项目:湖南省社会科学基金一般项目“武陵山片区生态习惯法研究”(15YBX022); 常州大学人才引进基金项目“生态习惯法研究”(ZMF19020052)。
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-08-31