[1]盛明科,孟佳.技术进步对区域科技创新绩效的影响及政策优化研究——不同投入强度下的门槛效应[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2019,20(04):56-66.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2019.04.007]
　Sheng Mingke,Meng Jia.[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2019,20(04):56-66.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2019.04.007]
点击复制

技术进步对区域科技创新绩效的影响及政策优化研究——不同投入强度下的门槛效应()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第20卷
期数:
2019年04期
页码:
56-66
栏目:
经济·管理学研究
出版日期:
2019-08-20

文章信息/Info

作者:
盛明科; 孟佳
Author(s):
Sheng Mingke;  Meng Jia
关键词:
科研投入强度; 技术进步; 科技创新绩效; 门槛效应
Keywords:
scientific research input intensity;  technological progress;  scientific and technological innovation performance;  threshold effects
分类号:
C34
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2019.04.007
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
合理配置科研资源及其投入强度，是提高国家或区域科技创新能力与创新绩效的基本前提。选择30个省域（含省、自治区、直辖市）2007-2016年的数据，运用面板效应模型研究科技投入对区域科技创新绩效的门槛效应。结果表明：不同科研投入强度下技术进步与区域科技创新绩效存在双重门槛效应。各省域科研投入强度存在空间差异，科研投入处于最佳投入区间的省域多位于国家东部，科研投入强度处于低强度的省域大部分位于国家的中部和西部地区。任何科研投入强度下，技术进步都是增强科技创新绩效的主要动力。因此，省域政府要根据实际调整科研投入强度，使各地区间的创新资源配置更加合理，打造科技创新平台，推动基础技术进步，逐步减小科技创新绩效的空间差异。
Abstract:
Reasonable allocation of scientific research resources and investment intensity is the basic premise to improve the national or regional scientific and technological innovation performance. Panel data from 2007 to 2016 in 30 provinces were selected to study the threshold effects of technological progress and regional scientific and technological innovation performance under different intensity of scientific research input by the use of panel effect model. The results demonstrate that there exist the double threshold effects between technological progress and regional technological and scientific innovation performance under different intensity of scientific research input. It is found that there are spatial differences in the scientific research input intensity of each province. Most provinces with the best scientific research input intensity are located in the east of China, while most provinces with the lowest scientific research input intensity are located in the central and western regions. Technological progress under different scientific research input intensity is the main driving force to promote the performance of scientific and technological innovation. Accordingly, the provincial governments should adjust scientific research input intensity according to the actual situations, strengthen the optimization and allocation of innovative resources among different regions, build scientific and technological innovation platforms, pay attention to the technological progress of infrastructure, and narrow the spatial differences of scientific and technological innovation performance.

参考文献/References:

[1］ 安晨雨,王素,陈玉文.政府科技资助对企业R&D投入的门槛效应研究——基于中国医药制造业省际面板数据的实证研究［J］.科技管理研究,2018,38(16):131.
[2］ 韩先锋,董明放.研发投入对企业绩效影响的门槛效应［J］.北京理工大学学报 (社会科学版), 2018,20(2)：95 105.
[3］ NELSON R R,PHELPS E U.Investment in humans,technological diffusion,and economic growth［J］.American economic review,1966(65):69 75.

[4］ SIMONEN J, MCCANN P.Firm innovation:the influence of R&D cooperation and the geography of human capital inputs［J］.Journal of urban economics,2008,64(1):146 154.



[5］ HUSSINGER K.R&D and subsidies at the firm level: an application of parametric and semiparametric two step selection models［J］. Journal of applied econometrics,2008,23(6):729 747.
[6］ NASIEROWSKI W,ARCELUS F J.On the efficiency of national innovation system ［J］.Socioeconomic planning sciences, 2003, 37(3): 215 314.
[7］ BUESA M, HEIJS J, MARTNEZ PELLITERO M, et al.Regional systems of innovation and the knowledge production function:the spanish case［J］.Technovation,2006,26(4):463 472.
[8］ ZENG S X, XIE X M, TAM C M.Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs［J］.Technovation,2010,30(3):181 194.
[9］ 李高扬,刘明广.基于Malmquist指数的国家创新型城市绩效实证评价［J］.技术与创新管理,2013,34(6):517 520.
[10］ 郑义,徐康宁.外资特征与技术创新:基于中国省际数据分析［J］.管理科学，2011,24(5):48 55.
[11］ 邵同尧,潘彦.风险投资、研发投入与区域创新:基于商标的省级面板研究［J］.科学学研究,2011,29(5):793 800.

[12］ LEE H J, LEE S, YOON B.Technology clustering based on evolutionary patterns: the case of information and communications technologies［J］.Technological forecasting and social change, 2011,78(6):953 967.
[13］ CHEN Y S, CHANG K C, CHANG C H.Nonlinear influence on R&D project performance［J］.Technological forecasting and social change, 2012,79(8):1537 1547.
[14］ YEH M L,CHU H P,SHER P J,et al.R&D intensity, firm performance and the identification of the threshold: fresh evidence from the panel threshold regression model［J］.Applied economics.2010,42(3):389 401.
[15］ 许治,何悦,王晗.政府R&D资助与企业R&D行为的影响因素:基于系统动力学研究［J］.管理评论,2012,24(4):67 75.
[16］ 戴小勇,成力为.研发投入强度对企业绩效影响的门槛效应研究［J］.科学学研究,2013，31(11):1708 1716.
[17］ HANSEN B E.Threshold effects in non dynamic panels: estimation, testing, and inference［J］.Journal of econometrics,1999,93(2):345 368.
[18］ 卢锐，陆芸.我国高技术产业创新能力提升路径研究［J］.常州大学学报（社会科学版），2018，19（1）：48 55.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介：盛明科，湘潭大学公共管理学院教授、博士研究生导师；孟佳，湘潭大学公共管理学院硕士研究生。
基金项目：湖南省社科成果评审委项目“创新型湖南建设绩效评价体系研究”（2015ZD01）。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-08-20