[1]叶德明.寡断与掣肘:朝廷决策视角下的同文馆之争[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2018,19(03):107-116.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2018.03.013]
　Ye Deming.Indecision and Making Difficulties: The Tongwen College Dispute under the Perspective of Court Decision[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2018,19(03):107-116.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2018.03.013]
点击复制

寡断与掣肘:朝廷决策视角下的同文馆之争()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第19卷
期数:
2018年03期
页码:
107-116
栏目:
文史哲研究:重识·省思·重构专题研究
出版日期:
2018-05-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Indecision and Making Difficulties: The Tongwen College Dispute under the Perspective of Court Decision
作者:
叶德明
Author(s):
Ye Deming
关键词:
同文馆;  争论;  决策;  寡断;  掣肘;  慈禧;  奕䜣;  倭仁
Keywords:
T’ung-wen College;  controversy;  decision-making;  indecision;  making difficulties;  Ci Xi;  Yi Xin;  Wo Ren
分类号:
D69
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2018.03.013
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
同文馆添设天文算学馆是晚清朝廷决策中的重大事件。由于垂帘听政决策体制存在天然的不足,洋务派和顽固派对王朝中兴所持的理念对立,致使同文馆添设天文算学馆决策一波三折,究其原因有以下几个方面:决策体制不健全,既有的体制未得到遵循; 清廷缺乏一个强有力的决策中心; 招生方案设计不当危及了顽固派的利益,成了决策争论的焦点; 奕䜣缺乏智囊人物应该具备的素质; 慈禧作为皇权的代表,理论上拥有最高的决策权,却缺乏对时局的分析、把控、决断能力; 倭仁缺乏处事能力,是不堪重用之才。这一切最终导致洋务派和顽固派在这场决策争论中都没有取得任何好处,同时皇权的威严也遭到了损害。
Abstract:
The establishment of Astronomy and Mathematics schools in Tongwen College was a major event of court decision in the late Qing dynasty. Due to the innate problem of the decision-making system by holding court behind a screen, the opposition of dynasty resurgence ideas between the westernization group and the diehards, the establishment of Astronomy and Mathematics schools in Tongwen College was tortuous. The reasons are as follows: unsound decision-making system, divergence from the existing system, lack of a powerful decision-making center in the Qing government; the improper design of the enrollment scheme endangered the interests of the diehards and became the focus of the argument; Yi Xin lacked the required quality of a think tank; Ci Xi lacked the ability to analyze, control and decide the current situation, though as the representative of the imperial power, she possessed the utmost decision-making power theoretically; Wo Ren lacked the handling ability and could not be trusted. Ultimately, both the westernization group and the diehards did not gain any benefit from the debate. At the same time, the majesty of the imperial power was damaged.

参考文献/References:

[1]清圣祖实录:卷275[M].影印本.北京:中华书局,1985:671.
[2]清高宗实录:卷323[M].影印本.北京:中华书局,1985:334.
[3]于敏中.日下旧闻考:第1册[M].北京:北京古籍出版社,2000.
[4]中国第一历史档案馆.咸同两朝上谕档:第11册[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,1998.
[5]魏源.海国图志[M].李巨澜,评注.郑州:中州古籍出版社,1999:67.
[6]《中国近代史丛书》编写组.洋务运动:第1册[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1973:8.
[7]《中国近代史丛书》编写组.洋务运动:第2册[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1973.
[8]宝鋆.筹办夷务始末(同治朝)[M]//沈云龙.近代中国史料丛刊:第62辑.台北:文海出版社,1970.
[9]王树敏,王延熙.皇清道咸同光奏议:卷1[M]//沈云龙.近代中国史料丛刊:第34辑. 台北:文海出版社,1969:97.
[10]冯桂芬.校邠庐抗议[M].中州古籍出版社,1998:210.
[11]王韬.瀛壖杂志[M].沈恒春,杨其民,标点.上海:上海古籍出版社,1989:44.
[12]郭嵩焘.郭嵩焘奏稿[M].杨坚,点校.长沙:岳麓书社,1983:283-284.
[13]朱有瓛.中国近代学制史料:第1辑(上)[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,1983.
[14]徐世昌.清儒学案[M].沈芝盈,梁运华,点校.北京:中华书局,2008:6377.
[15]吴廷栋.拙修集:卷9[M].沈阳:辽宁大学出版社,1990:36-37.
[16]翁同龢.翁同龢日记:第1册[M].北京:中华书局,1989.
[17]徐一士.一士谭荟[M]//沈云龙.近代中国史料丛刊:第1辑.台北:文海出版社,1966:136.
[18]曾国藩.曾国藩全集[M].长沙:岳麓书社,1987:6814.
[19]雪珥.恭亲王之死[N].中国经营报,2010-07-17(D07).
[20]毕乃德.同文馆考[J].中华教育界,1935(2):13-26.
[21]《中国近代史丛书》编写组.洋务运动:第8册[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1973:233.
[22]LINDBLOM.The science of “muddling through”[J].Public administration review, 1959,19(2):79-88.
[23]国语[M].尚学锋,夏德靠,译注.北京:中华书局,2007:384.
[24]吴宣易.京师同文馆略史[J].读书月刊,1933,2(4):12-15.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:叶德明,安徽师范大学历史与社会学院讲师。
基金项目:安徽省哲学社会科学规划青年项目“新时期安徽农村社会治理机制及其创新路径研究”(AHSKQ2014D84)。
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-05-20