[1]马竞遥.我国营业财产转让制度立法模式[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2017,18(04):23-32.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2017.04.004]
　Ma Jingyao.On the Legislative Mode of Chinese Business Property Transfer Regulations[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2017,18(04):23-32.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2017.04.004]
点击复制

我国营业财产转让制度立法模式()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第18卷
期数:
2017年04期
页码:
23-32
栏目:
法学研究
出版日期:
2017-08-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
On the Legislative Mode of Chinese Business Property Transfer Regulations
作者:
马竞遥
Author(s):
Ma Jingyao
关键词:
营业财产;  财产转让;  立法模式
Keywords:
business property;  property transfer;  legislative mode
分类号:
D913.99
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2017.04.004
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
营业财产的价值主要体现于转让营业财产所有权的实践操作过程。通过界定营业财产转让的概念,分析我国营业财产转让规制的现状,发现当下相关系统性专门法律缺失的问题。我国有关调整营业财产转让的规范散见于其他制度中,法律条文中存在“营业财产转让”的表述,但相关立法未就其含义做出明确解释。通过对大陆法系国家规则模式的考察,借鉴其先进的营业财产转让制度,结合我国民商事法律活动经营现状,提出我国营业财产转让制度模式的现实选择应该是通过改造现有的重大资产转让和企业名称转让的方式,建立具有中国特色的间接规制模型,从而规范和完善我国的营业财产转让制度。
Abstract:
The value of business property is reflected in the transfer process of business property ownership. Relevant systematic legal deficiency is found in the definition of business property transfer and through the analysis of the present legal regulations in our country. Regulations of business property transfer are scattered in other regulations. The term “business property transfer” can be found in legal regulations but there is no clear definition of it. Through the investigation of regulations and modes of civil law countries, learning from their advanced business property transfer regulations, based on the operating status quo of Chinese civil and commercial legal activities, it is suggested that the practical choice of Chinese business property transfer regulations is to modify the current methods of major property transfer and business name transfer, establish an indirect regulative model with Chinese characteristics, so as to standardize and complete Chinese business property transfer regulations.

参考文献/References:

[1]王保树.商法总论[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2007:185-190.
[2]法国商法典[M]. 金帮贵,译.北京:中国法制出版社,2000:391.
[3]娜一美.俄罗斯当代民法研究[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2006:120.
[4]程淑娟.我国商事立法模式的再思考—兼论《商法典》《商事通则》的不可行性[J].甘肃理论学刊,2008(1):107-111.
[5]刘小勇.国外营业转让规制及其在我国的引人——日本及美国法对我国的启示[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2010(2):110-117.
[6]任尔昕,张完连.论营业转让与商号转让[J].甘肃社会科学,2007(2):171-174,128.
[7]卡纳里斯 C W.德国商法[M].杨继,译.北京:法律出版社,2006:293.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:马竞遥,法学博士,中山大学立法基地在站博士后,广东省立法研究所研究人员。
基金项目:国家社会科学基金重点项目“中国特色生态环境公益诉讼理论和制度研究”(14AFX023); 广东省哲学社会科学规划项目“论设区的市地方立法权限划分”(GD16XFX11)。
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-08-01