[1]郑超.论儒家思想和国学发展[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2017,18(01):25-34.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2017.01.004]
　Zheng Chao.On Confucianism and Sinology Development[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2017,18(01):25-34.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2017.01.004]
点击复制

论儒家思想和国学发展()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第18卷
期数:
2017年01期
页码:
25-34
栏目:
哲学研究
出版日期:
2017-01-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
On Confucianism and Sinology Development
作者:
郑超
Author(s):
Zheng Chao
关键词:
国学;  儒家;  中体西用;  全体大用;  本体论
Keywords:
Sinology;  Confucianism;  westernized Chinese style;  quanti dayong;  ontology
分类号:
B2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2017.01.004
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
国学是中国近现代思想史上的一个重要议题。国学话题的发生和中体西用有着关联性,它们都试图解决儒家思想与西学的关系。以章太炎为代表的国粹派是立足于史学的国学观; 胡适提出的“整理国故”延续了史学式国学观,又把对中国文化的态度推向了极端。儒家式国学观在20世纪前半期影响不大,但它是立足于儒家本体论的思想,是有本有源的国学观,能够更好地评判西方文化和现代价值。与史学式国学观相比,儒家式国学观以高明的本体论思想为基础,进而在20世纪90年代以来的国学热中占据主要地位,显现出顽强的生命力。
Abstract:
Sinology is an important topic in the history of modern Chinese thoughts. The beginning of Sinology was related to westernized Chinese style. They both tried to settle the relationship between Confucianism and western learning. With Zhang Taiyan as the representative, concepts of Sinology of Chinese culture quintessence school is based on Historiography. Hu Shi proposed to “sort out the national cultural heritage”, which is the continuation of historical Sinology and pushes the attitude towards Chinese culture to an extreme. Confucian Sinology didn’t have much influence during the first half of the 20th century, but it is based on the ontological Confucian thoughts and is Sinology with origins, which can better evaluate the western culture and modern values. Compared with historical Sinology, Confucian Sinology is based on wiser ontological thoughts so as to take a prominent position in the Sinology fever since the 1990s and shows strong vitality.

参考文献/References:

[1]张之洞.劝学篇·设学[M].北京:华夏出版社,2002:94.[2]观云.平等说与中国旧伦理之冲突[N].新民丛报, 1905-12-11.[3]严复.严复集:第3册[M].北京:中华书局,1986:558-559.[4]严复.严复集:第1册[M].北京:中华书局,1986:52-53.[5]梁启超.湖南时务学堂学约十章[N].时务报,1897-12-24(49).[6]吴汝纶.吴汝纶尺牍[M].合肥:黄山书社.1990:142.[7]章太炎.章太炎政论选集[M].北京:中华书局,1977:276.[8]章太炎.訄书详注[M].徐复,注.上海:上海古籍出版社,2008:51.[9]章太炎.国故论衡疏证[M].庞俊,郭诚永,疏证.北京:中华书局,2008:356.[10]章太炎.章太炎全集:第四册[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1985:154.[11]胡适.胡适文集:第3册[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2013:9.[12]胡适.胡适文集:第12册[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2013.[13]马一浮.马一浮全集:第一册·上[M].杭州:浙江古籍出版社,2013.[14]熊十力.熊十力全集:第三卷[M].武汉:湖北教育出版社,2001.[15]牟宗三.生命的学问[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2005:124.[16]钱穆.现代中国学术论衡·序[M].北京:三联书店,2001.[17]李景林.重建中国学术的通性基础[J].天津社会科学,2010(2):19-23.[18]郭齐勇.牟宗三先生“三统并建”说及其现代意义[J].孔子研究,2016(1):120-125.[19]蒋庆.“大陆新儒家”正在形成中[J].原道,2015(2):223-243.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:郑超,北京师范大学哲学学院博士研究生。基金项目:国家社科基金重大项目“中国传统价值观变迁史”(14ZDB0003)。
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-02-10