[1]王睿倩.试析我国仲裁司法监督制度的不足与完善[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2016,17(06):31-36.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2016.06.005]
　Wang Ruiqian.On the Deficiency and Perfection of the Judicial SupervisionSystem of Arbitration in China[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2016,17(06):31-36.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2016.06.005]
点击复制

试析我国仲裁司法监督制度的不足与完善()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第17卷
期数:
2016年06期
页码:
31-36
栏目:
政治学研究
出版日期:
2016-12-13

文章信息/Info

Title:
On the Deficiency and Perfection of the Judicial SupervisionSystem of Arbitration in China
作者:
王睿倩
Author(s):
Wang Ruiqian
关键词:
仲裁裁决;  程序监督;  司法监督
Keywords:
arbitration award;  procedure supervision;  judicial supervision
分类号:
D926.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2016.06.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
撤销仲裁裁决与不予执行仲裁裁决是我国仲裁的两种司法监督制度。对这两种司法监督制度,从现行法律规定看,虽然实现了二者标准的基本统一,但仍存在诸多缺陷与不足。对申请撤销仲裁裁决,现行法律规定在程序上存有空白。实体审查损害仲裁权威。撤销裁决的裁定不能上诉,当事人或仲裁机构没有救济途径。两种司法监督制度在内容设置上存在着重叠及矛盾,使已经生效的仲裁裁决处于效力不确定状态,还可能会造成上下级法院的权力倒置,损害仲裁制度的快捷性,与国际的通常做法不符。因此,需要完善和重构我国仲裁的司法监督制度,变“全面监督”为“程序监督”,建立司法监督的救济程序,取消不予执行制度,缩短审查期限并限制异议期限,变“双轨制”为“单轨制”,将国内仲裁和涉外仲裁的司法监督体制均限定在程序范围内。
Abstract:
Revocation of the arbitral award and the enforcement of arbitral awards are two kinds of judicial supervision system of our country. On these two kinds of judicial supervision system, from the existing legal provisions, although the realization of the basic unity of the two standards, but there are still many defects and deficiencies. For the application to revoke the arbitral award, the existing laws and regulations in the process there is a blank. Entity review damage arbitration authority. The ruling cannot be appealed, the parties or the arbitration institution has no remedy. Two kinds of judicial supervision system in the content settings exist overlap and contradiction, which has been in force in a state of uncertainty the effectiveness of arbitration, inverted power can also result in lower courts; quick damage arbitration system; usually inconsistent with international. Therefore, the judicial supervision system to improve and reconstruct our arbitration, “full supervision” to “supervision procedures”, the establishment of the judicial supervision of the relief program, not to cancel the implementation of the system, shorten the review period and limit the objection period, change the “double track” as the “single track”, the domestic arbitration and arbitration judicial the supervision system is defined in the scope of the program.

参考文献/References:

[1]胡荻.论我国仲裁裁决不予执行与撤销制度重叠的困境及其重构[J].法治研究,2013(10):97.
[2]方刚成.2012年《民事诉讼法》修改对国内仲裁制度的影响[J].法制与社会,2013(8):83.
[3]罗芳.论仲裁裁决撤销制度与不予执行制度的协调[J].大同大学学报(社会科学版),2015(12):8.
[4]姜建新,陈立伟.关于仲裁裁决司法审查的调查与思考——对不予执行及申请撤销仲裁审查的实证分析[J].法律适用,2013(10):97.
[5]段荣玉.论仲裁自愿原则在我国仲裁制度中的价值[J].法制与社会,2013(7):107.
[6]汪小娟.我国涉外商事仲裁司法审查问题[J].合作经济与科技, 2014(3):124.
[7]张烁坤.论我国仲裁裁决撤销程序与不予执行制度的冲突与协调[J].经济研究导刊,2016(13):199.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:王睿倩,中共常州市委党校教授。
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-11-20