[1]贾辰君.论预约合同[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2015,16(04):41-44.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2015.04.007]
　JIA Chen-jun.Study on Pre-contract[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2015,16(04):41-44.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2015.04.007]
点击复制

论预约合同()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第16卷
期数:
2015年04期
页码:
41-44
栏目:
出版日期:
2015-07-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on Pre-contract
作者:
贾辰君
同济大学 法学院，上海 200092
Author(s):
JIA Chen-jun
Law School, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
关键词:
预约合同; 本约合同; 意向协议; 强制缔约
Keywords:
pre-contract;  traditional contract;  letter of intention;  compulsorily entering into a contract
分类号:
DF522
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2015.04.007
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
预约合同在经济活动中广泛被采用，预约合同并非附属合同，而是一种独立类型的合同。最高人民法院《关于审理买卖合同纠纷案件适用法律问题的解释》第2条首次正式承认了预约合同，这具有重要意义。预约合同的标的和传统合同相比有特殊性，预约合同的成立和生效要件应该符合《合同法》的规定。意向协议和预约合同在构成要件和法律拘束力方面差异很大。预约合同与本约合同之间是有界限的，要区分开来。预约合同的违约责任和其他合同的违约责任是一样的，不能陷入预约合同不能强制履行的误区。
Abstract:
Pre-contract contract is widely used in the market economy, and the pre-contract is a separate contract. Article 2 in Interpretations of the Supreme People's Court on Issues Concerning the Application of Law for the Trial of Cases Involving Disputes over Sale and Purchase Contracts officially acknowledged the pre-contract for the first time, ant it is of great significance. The subject matter of pre-contract is fairly special compared to the traditional contract, and its founded elements should comply with the requirement of Contract Law. Pre-contracts are different to letters of intention about the founded element and the force of law. There is difference between pre-contract and traditional contract, and it should be noticed. The obligation of violating pre-contract is distinct from traditional contract, and we should not misunderstand that the pre-contract is unfit for compulsory performance.

参考文献/References:

[1]陈进. 意向书的法律效力探析［J］. 法学论坛,2013(1):144.
[2］隋彭生. 论试用买卖的预约属性［J］. 政治与法律,2010(4):114. 
[3］汤文平. 德国预约制度研究［J］. 河北法学,2012(1):149. 
[4］白玉. 预约合同的法理及其应用［J］. 东岳论丛,2009(7):157.
[5］许德风. 意向书的法律效力问题［J］. 法学,2007(10): 79.
[6］梁彗星. 对买卖合同解释(法释
[2012］号)第二条解读［EB/OL］．(2013-05-27)
[2015-02-10］．中国法学网http://www.iolaw.org.cn/showArticle.asp?id=3660.
[7］陆青.《买卖合同司法解释》第2条评析［J］. 法学家,2013(3)：116.
[8］王利明. 预约合同若干问题研究——我国司法解释相关规定述评［J］. 法商研究,2014(1):60.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介：贾辰君(1981—)，男，河南舞阳人，博士研究生，讲师，主要从事民法、知识产权法等研究。 基金项目：上海市哲学社会科学规划课题（2011BGL002）。
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-09-16