[1]单磊.“举刺予夺”:明季野史笔记的重要特征[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2015,16(01):70-75.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2015.01.013]
　SHAN Lei.“Praise or Degrade”: An Important Feature of Unofficial History in Late Ming Dynasty[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2015,16(01):70-75.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2015.01.013]
点击复制

“举刺予夺”:明季野史笔记的重要特征()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第16卷
期数:
2015年01期
页码:
70-75
栏目:
文史研究
出版日期:
2015-01-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
“Praise or Degrade”: An Important Feature of Unofficial History in Late Ming Dynasty
作者:
单磊
南京大学 中国思想家研究中心,江苏 南京 210093
Author(s):
SHAN Lei
Center for Studies of Chinese Thinkers, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
关键词:
明季;  野史笔记;  “举刺予夺”
Keywords:
late Ming Dynasty;  unofficial history;  “Praise or degrade”
分类号:
K248
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2015.01.013
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
明季野史笔记表现出“举刺予夺”的重要特征。政治腐败、社会险恶是其社会土壤; 官史失修、史官失职是其史学动因; 存史意识、立言情结是其心理基础。这种史学风格自明中叶开始兴盛,明清鼎革之际达到颠峰,入清后逐渐跌入低谷。“举刺予夺”具有强烈的现实性和批判性品格。这一特征延续宋代以来注重褒贬的史学风气,一方面有利于史家主体意识的彰显,另一方面也助长了驰骋议论的空疏之风。明季“举刺予夺”之风纵然炽烈,也未能挣脱桎梏,反映出中国史学中保守因素的难以抗拒性。
Abstract:
“Praise or degrade” was an important feature of unofficial history in the late Ming Dynasty. The political corruption and dangerous society, untended official historic records and dereliction of duty of the official historians were reasons for the feature, as well as the personal element of keeping a historic record and discussion. The feature prospered in the mid-Ming Dynasty, reached the climate during the replacement of Ming Dynasty by Qing Dynasty, and recessed in the Qing Dynasty. “Praise or degrade” embodied strong realistic and critical characteristics. The feature had carried on the tradition of emphasis on praising and degrading since the Song Dynasty. On the one hand, it was beneficial to the manifestation of historians' subjective consciousness; on the other hand, it boosted the emptiness of comments. “Praise or degrade” was popular but restrained, which reflected the irresistible conservative element in Chinese history study.

参考文献/References:

[1]单磊.晚明野史笔记繁盛的历史合理性[J].福建论坛:人文社会科学版,2009(10):99-101.
[2][清]永瑢.四库全书总目[G].北京:中华书局,1965.
[3][明]朱长祚.玉镜新谭[M].北京:中华书局,1989:123-124.
[4][明]刘若愚.酌中志[M].北京:北京古籍出版社,1994.
[5][明]郎瑛.七修类稿[M].上海:上海书店,2009:136.
[6][明]王世贞.弇山堂别集[M].北京:中华书局,1985.
[7][明]沈德符.万历野获编[M].北京:中华书局,1959:61.
[8][明]李建泰.序[M]/何乔远.名山藏.福州:福建人民出版社,2010:1.
[9][清]赵尔巽.清史稿[M].北京:中华书局,1976:13863.
[10][清]王弘撰.山志[M].北京:中华书局,1999.
[11][清]文秉.先拨志始[M].北京:北京古籍出版社,1999.
[12][明]王临亨.粤剑编[M].北京:中华书局,1987.
[13]杜维运.史学方法论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2006:274-277.
[14][明]于慎行.谷山笔麈[M]. 南京:江苏人民出版社,1981.
[15][清]谈迁.枣林杂俎[M].北京:中华书局,2006:201-202.
[16][明]张瀚.松窗梦语[M].北京:中华书局,1985.
[17][明]张怡.玉光剑气集[M].北京:中华书局,2006.
[18][明]程涓.序[M]/叶权著.贤博编.北京:中华书局,1987:1.
[19]谢国桢.晚明史籍考[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2010.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:单磊(1985— ),男,河南新蔡人,博士研究生,主要从事明清史学思想史研究。
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-02-20