[1]张宁.《不动产登记暂行条例》的若干评析与建议[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2015,16(01):27-332.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2015.01.006]
　ZhANG ning.Several Comments and Suggestions on The Real Estate Registration Interim Regulations[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2015,16(01):27-332.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2015.01.006]
点击复制

《不动产登记暂行条例》的若干评析与建议()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第16卷
期数:
2015年01期
页码:
27-332
栏目:
政治学研究
出版日期:
2015-01-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Several Comments and Suggestions on The Real Estate Registration Interim Regulations
作者:
张宁
安徽工程大学 人文学院,安徽 芜湖 241000
Author(s):
ZhANG ning
College of Humanities, Anhui Polytechnic University, Wuhu 241000,China
关键词:
不动产登记;  不动产登记程序;  《不动产登记暂行条例》
Keywords:
the registration of real estate;  real estate registration procedures;  The Real Estate Registration Interim Regulations
分类号:
D923.2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2015.01.006
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
《不动产登记暂行条例》按照《物权法》的规定,实行不动产统一登记制度,改变我国当前不动产“多头登记”的现状,有利于界定不动产归属,维护交易安全。总则部分关于登记范围的规定遗漏了探矿权、采矿权、取水权这三种重要的权利,且没有在全国范围内确定唯一的不动产登记机构,故没有真正实现完全意义上的不动产统一登记; 暂行条例首次规定了不动产登记薄的设置、保管、查阅等内容,但是依然欠缺登记簿法律效力的规定,没有彻底地贯彻物权公示公信原则; 登记程序亦没有和《物权法》的程序性规定实现有效整合。登记机构对于登记申请的审查义务的规定明确、具体,在明晰审查义务的基础上,援引《物权法》的规定确定登记错误时登记机构的赔偿责任,较为合理。
Abstract:
In accordance with the provisions of the property law and requirements, The Real Estate Registration Interim Regulations carries out unified registration of immovable property,changes current real estate status of “bull registration”. It is beneficial to determine ownership of real estate and maintain security of transaction. Mineral exploration right,mining right and the water intake right in part of general provisions is omited. The real estate registration agencies isn't determined nationwide. So there is no true sense of the unified registration of immovable property. Interim Regulations for the first time stipulate the real property register settings, custody, access to content, but still lacks the registration book of legal validity, did not completely implement the principle of publicity and trust. The Provisional Regulations isn't integrated procedural provisions of property law. But the provisions for the registration application review obligations is clear, specific. Based on clear review obligations, citing the “property law” provisions of the liability of the registration agency to determine the registration liability is reasonable.

参考文献/References:

[1]车娜.如何迎接“统一”的到来——不动产登记研讨会述评[J].中国土地,2013(6):15-18.
[2]孙宪忠.中国物权法总论[M].北京:法律出版社,2003:250.
[3]向明.论我国不动产登记机关的合理选择[J].甘肃社会科学,2010(4):48-51.
[4] 王亦君 高颖.“有些问题争议较大,短期内很难达成共识”[EB/OL].(2014-09-13)
[2014-12-01]. http://zqb.cyol.com/html/2014-09/13/nw.D110000zgqnb_20140913_2-03.htm.
[5]朱广新.不动产登记制度研究——以不动产登记薄为中心[J].河南省政法管理干部学院学报,2010(4):91-98.
[6]程啸.不动产登记薄之推定力[J].法学研究,2010(3):106-119.
[7]最高人民法院物权法研究小组.中华人民共和国物权法条文理解与适用[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2007:93.
[8]姚虹.论不动产登记制度之完善[J].学术交流,2011(3):59-62.
[9]于海涌.论实质审查与登记机关谨慎义务的边界——以《房屋登记办法》为中心[J].暨南学报:哲学社会科学版,2009(1):8-11.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:张宁(1980—),男,安徽霍山人,硕士,讲师,主要从事物权法等研究。 基金项目:2013年教育部人文社会科学研究专项任务项目(13JDSZ2088)。
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-02-20