[1]黄林蒙.民国之际“ 文笔之辨” 及其文学史意义[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2014,15(05):55-58.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2014.05.014]
 HUANG Lin-meng.“Argument between Wen and Bi” in the Republic of China and its 〖JZ〗Significance in Literary History[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2014,15(05):55-58.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2014.05.014]
点击复制

民国之际“ 文笔之辨” 及其文学史意义()
分享到:

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第15卷
期数:
2014年05期
页码:
55-58
栏目:
文史研究
出版日期:
2014-10-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
“Argument between Wen and Bi” in the Republic of China and its 〖JZ〗Significance in Literary History
作者:
黄林蒙
福建师范大学 文学院,福建 福州 350007
Author(s):
HUANG Lin-meng
Faculty of Liberal Arts, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China
关键词:
民国之际文笔之辨社会背景文学史意义
Keywords:
in the Republic of China argument between Wen and Bi the social background significance in literary history
分类号:
I206.2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2014.05.014
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
民国之际的“文笔之辨”既是文体发展的必然结果,亦与骈文和散文之争的文学历史背景密切相关。刘师培、章太炎、黄侃等一批学者以北京大学为阵地,对“文”与“笔”范围和内涵进行了重新的界定,在一定程度上表现了对六朝文论的复归。从文学史上看,民国之际的“文笔之辨”在为骈体文寻求正统地位的同时,客观上也张扬了文学的审美功能。总之,民国之际学者们有关“文笔之辨”的理论总结和创作性的阐释,使得清末民初成为了“文笔之辨”历史的重要组成部分。
Abstract:
“Argument between Wen and Bi” in the Republic of China is not only the inevitable outcome of the development of writing styles, but also closely related to the historical literary background, that is the competition between parallel prose and prose. Based on Peking University, a group of scholars such as LIU Shi—pei, ZHANG Tai—yan and HUANG Kan redefined the scope and connotation of “Wen” and “Bi”, which, to a certain extent, shows the return to the literary theory in the Six Dynasties. From the perspective of literary history, “argument between Wen and Bi” in the Republic of China, seeks legitimacy for parallel prose while objectively affirming the aesthetic function of literature. In short, the theoretical summary and creative interpretation of scholars about “argument between Wen and Bi” in the Republic of China makes the late Qing Dynasty and the early years of the Republic of China an important part of the history of “argument between Wen and Bi”.

参考文献/References:

[1]朱偰.五四运动前后的北京大学[M].北京:文史资料出版社,1983: 162.
[2]刘师培.中国中古文学史讲义[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2000:108.
[3]詹福瑞.“文”“文章”与“丽”[J].文艺理论研究,1999(5):81—82..
[4]沈约.宋书[M].北京:中华书局,1974:1830.
[5]刘师培.文章原始[M].南京:江苏古籍出版社,1997:1646.
[6]章太炎.国故论衡[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2003
[7]章太炎.章太炎:国学的精要[M].北京:中国画报出版社,2010:217.
[8]詹鍈.文心雕龙义证[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1999:1622—1623.
[9]程千帆.文论十笺[M].哈尔滨:黑龙江人民出版社,1983:21.
[10]郭绍虞.文笔说考辨[J].文艺论丛,1978(3):52.
[11]黄侃.文心雕龙札记[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,1996:267.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:黄林蒙(1990—) ,女,浙江温州人,硕士研究生,主要从事唐宋文学研究。
更新日期/Last Update: 2014-09-25