[1]高新民,江雨.东西哲学有无之辩比较研究应有新的维度[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2013,14(05):10-16.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095—042X.2013.05.003]
GAO Xinmin,JIANG Yu.The Comparative Study of Debate upon Being and Non － being in the Eastern and
Western Philosophy Ought to Have a New Dimension[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2013,14(05):10-16.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095—042X.2013.05.003]
点击复制
东西哲学有无之辩比较研究应有新的维度(
)
常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]
- 卷:
-
第14卷
- 期数:
-
2013年05期
- 页码:
-
10-16
- 栏目:
-
哲学研究
- 出版日期:
-
2013-10-31
文章信息/Info
- Title:
-
The Comparative Study of Debate upon Being and Non － being in the Eastern and
Western Philosophy Ought to Have a New Dimension
- 作者:
-
高新民; 江雨
-
华中师范大学心灵与认知研究中心，湖北武汉430079
- Author(s):
-
GAO Xin—min; JIANG Yu
-
Research Center for Mind and Cognition，Central China Normal University，Wuhan 430079，China
-
- 关键词:
-
比较研究; 有无之辩; 本体之无; 大异大同
- Keywords:
-
the comparative study; debate upon Being and Non － being; Non － being of noumenon; identity and
difference
- 分类号:
-
B223. 1
- DOI:
-
10.3969/j.issn.2095—042X.2013.05.003
- 文献标志码:
-
A
- 摘要:
-
无论在西方还是东方哲学里，有无之辩或非存在问题都是形而上学的一个主要问题。从比较哲学的角度看，目前学界
有这样几种共识，一是认为西方哲学关注“有”本身，东方哲学关注“无”。二是中国哲学对“无”的认识尽管历史悠久成果
丰硕，但并没有研究纯粹本体论意义上的“无”，只是在做价值论和人生哲学的探讨。三是对中西有无之辩的比较研究持两种
对立的态度，即“大同”观，强调其可公度性，“大异”观，强调两者有水火不容的差异性，不能做比较研究。而然，通过梳
理西方哲学史发现，有无之辩问题贯穿西哲史始终，西方哲学关注“有”本身，
- Abstract:
-
Both in the western philosophy and the eastern philosophy，debate upon Being and Non － being ( non
－ existentialism) is a major issue in metaphysics． From the perspective of comparative philosophy，there are several
consensuses in the academic circles: firstly，western philosophy concerns“Being”while eastern philosophy concerns“
Non － being”． Secondly，although the “Non － being”theory has a long and fruitful history，Chinese philosophy
has paid no attention to research on pure“Non － being”in the sense of ontology，just discussing on axiology
and philosophy of life． Thirdly，there are two opposite attitudes towards the comparative study of debate upon
Being and non － Being in the East and West． One is to treat the two as“identical”，another is to treat the two as
“distinct”． The differences between them are so big that they can＇t be comparatively studied． However，after combing
the history of western philosophy，we have found that debate upon Being and Non － being runs through the history．
Western philosophy concerns“Being”itself，but did not ignore the research on“Non － being”，the two make
a forward step in the research． By sorting out the original works of Chinese philosophy，we found that the ancient
Chinese philosophers，not only made a unique exploration on non － state and non － effort from the value philosophy
and life philosophy angles，but also studied non － being of noumenon and non － being of epistemology． Thanks to
this，the research on non － existence in China is both comprehensive and in － depth． As to the“identical and distinct”
issue which academics share quite opposite opinions，we have made a more detailed study and supplement．
We do not praise or criticize one party． There are differences between them，but they tend to be identical．
参考文献/References:
[1]［日］ 柳田圣山. 禅与中国［M］ . 毛丹青，译. 北京: 三联
书店，1988: 绪言.
[2］ 杨国荣. 形而上学与哲学的内在视域［J］ . 学术月刊，2004
( 12) : 21.
[3］ 康中乾. 有无之辨［M］ . 北京: 人民出版社，2003: 128—
134.
[4］ 方克立. 中国哲学范畴集［M］ . 北京: 人民出版社，1985:
130.
[5］ 冯友兰. 魏晋玄学贵无论关于有无的理论［J］ . 北京大学学
报，1986 ( 1) : 15.
[6］ 郭庆藩. 庄子集释卷二［M］ . 上海: 中华书局，1978: 312.
[7］ 成中英. 本体与诠释［M］ . 北京: 三联书店，2000: 134.
[8］ 唐君毅. 中西哲学思想之比较论文集［M］ . 台北: 学生书局，
1988: 5.
[9］ 牟宗三. 中国哲学十九讲［M］ . 台北: 学生书局，1983:
255—256.
[10］ 赵敦华. 中西形而上学的有无之辩［J］ . 北京大学学报，
1998 ( 2) : 206.
[11］ 金克木. 印度文化论集［M］ . 北京: 中国社会科学出版社，
1987: 2.
[12］ 张岱年. 张岱年全集: 卷二［M］ . 石家庄: 河北人民出版
社，2007: 4—7.
[13］ 李学勤. 十三经注疏·毛诗正义［M］ . 北京: 北京大学出版
社，1999: 1269.
[14］ 杨柳桥. 庄子译注［M］ . 上海: 上海古籍出版社，2006:
385.
备注/Memo
- 备注/Memo:
-
作者简介: 高新民( 1957—) ，男，湖北武汉人，教授、博士生导师，国务院特殊津贴获得者，主要从事西方哲学
史、心灵哲学、宗教哲学和人生哲学研究。
基金项目: 国家社科基金重大招标项目( 12＆ZD120 )
更新日期/Last Update:
2013-09-25