[1]肖云恩.“忘知之知”——试析庄子的“真知”[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2010,11(03):5-9.
 XIAO Yun- en.Wisdom of Transcending Knowledge——Analysis of Zhuangzi's " Pure Knowledge"[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2010,11(03):5-9.
点击复制

“忘知之知”       ——试析庄子的“真知”()
分享到:

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第11卷
期数:
2010年03期
页码:
5-9
栏目:
哲学研究
出版日期:
2010-09-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Wisdom of Transcending Knowledge    ——Analysis of Zhuangzi's " Pure Knowledge"
作者:
肖云恩
北京师范大学哲学与社会学学院, 北京100875
Author(s):
XIAO Yun- en
College o f Philoso phy and Sociolog y, Beijing No rmal Univ ersity, Beijing 100875, China
关键词:
庄子 真知 本真之道 忘知之知
Keywords:
Zhuangzi t rue know ledg e real " dao " wisdom of t ranscending knowledge
分类号:
B223. 5
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
哲学上关于“真”或真实问题的讨论, 一般都归属于知识论的范畴。尽管先秦时期的庄子对认知意义上的“知”是持怀 疑和否定的态度, 但我们却不能因此就认为, 庄子哲学里完全没有关于“真知”的思想, 只不过庄子所主张的“真知”并非西方 认知意义上的“知”, 而是一种“忘知之知”的大智慧。在庄子看来, 人们若只站在各自有限的角度, 把自然万物当成和自我主 体相对立的客体来进行区别, 而不顾及对象事物本身周流不息的自然情状, 那么所形成的观点就只能是有限的。故他认为只有从 “道”的角度来对对象世界进行观照, 即“以道
Abstract:
T he discussion of "True" or t ruth in philosophy is generally att ributed to the ar ea of knowledge. Zhuangzi, the great thinker in Pre- Qin Dynasty in China, was skept ical to the cognitiv e sense of " know ing" w ith negat ive att itude. It do es not follow that there is no tho ug ht of " t rue knowledge" at all in his philosophy . T he " t rue know ledg e" Zhuangzi adv ocated is not like a w ester n cognitiv e sense of " know ing " , but a gr eat w isdom of abandoning know ledg e. In his opinion, if peo ple stand on their ow n limited point of view , then the view they formed can o nly be limited. Because they take the natural w orld as the o pposed object regardless of their natural characters by the nature's endless stream of pow er . T hat is w hy he believ es that human beings can only ref lect on the object in the w or ld by the principle of the " Dao " to gain w isdom o f t ranscending know ledge.

参考文献/References:

[1] 李泽厚. 中国古代思想史论[M] . 天津: 天津社会科学出 版社, 2003: 168.
[2] 陈鼓应. 庄子[M] . 北京: 中华书局, 2006: 246.
[3] 陈鼓应. 老子注译及评介[M] . 北京: 中华书局, 1984: 357.
[4] 冯友兰. 贞元六书[M] . 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 1996: 751.
[5] 徐复观. 中国艺术精神[M] . 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2001: 43.

相似文献/References:

[1]鲍 宇.庄学稷下黄老学价值观比较[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2006,7(02):1.
 BAO Yu.A Realm of Knowledge: A Comparison of the School of Zhuang and the School of Huanglao[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2006,7(03):1.
[2]郑珊珊.庄子生命思想形成原因再探讨[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2010,11(03):13.
 ZHENG Sha n- sha n.Reconsideration of Formation of Zhuangzi 's Philosophy of Life[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2010,11(03):13.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介: 肖云恩( 1978—) , 男, 浙江温州人, 博士研究生, 主要从事艺术理论研究。
更新日期/Last Update: 2010-09-25