«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:

第9卷

期数:

2008年03期

页码:

30-33

栏目:

出版日期:

2008-09-25

文章信息/Info

Title:

On the Justice System of Aufkaungsrecht in Adm in istrative Procedure

作者:

王琦琦

南通大学化学化工学院, 江苏南通226007

Author(s):

WAN G Q i- qi

School of Chem istry and Chem ical Engineering, N antong U niversity, N antong 226007, Ch ina

关键词:

释明权;  行政诉讼;  职权主义;  当事人主义;  辩论主义

Keywords:

the system of aufkaungsrech t;  adm inistrative arocedure;  the authority system;  the system of a L itigant;  the adversary yystem

分类号:

D926.2

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

法官释明权是诉讼法学的一个重要问题, 在行政诉讼法学界却没有得到应有的重视。法官释明权作为职权主义诉讼模式 的应有之义, 更作为当事人主义诉讼模式的必要“补丁”, 其价值在现今两大法系都获得不同程度的彰显。在倾向职权主义模式 的行政诉讼领域, 作为制度事实的法官释明权已经存在, 法律规范也在其解释功能的缝隙中透露着释明权的生存空间。因此, 在 理论上厘定和梳理行政诉讼法的法官释明权体现出一定的急迫性。

Abstract:

The system of A ufkaungsrech t, a big issue in P rocedural L aw as it is, receives little attention as it deserves in the area of A dm inistrative P rocedure. A definition for the p rocedural model of the A uthority System , also a supp lement to System of a L itigant as w ell as the P roceduralModel, th is term has its special value in the two currently leading law system s. It not only exerts its effect in A dm inistrative P rocedure area w h ich values the A uthority System , but also in legal norm s that accounts for its function. It therefore has its theoretical significance in its urgent app lication in reconstructing the A dm inistrative P roceduralL aw.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

作者简介: 王琦琦(1974- ) , 女, 江苏海门人, 硕士, 助理研究员, 主要从事高校学生思想教育研究。

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2008-09-25