«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:

第9卷

期数:

2008年03期

页码:

26-29

栏目:

出版日期:

2008-09-25

文章信息/Info

Title:

Law Appl ication to “ Facts Proved Legal ly”

作者:

沈世娟¹ ;  张建松²

1. 江苏工业学院法学与公共管理学院, 江苏常州213164; 2. 江苏博爱星律师事务所, 江苏常州213003

Author(s):

SHEN Shi- juan1 ;  ZHANG jian- so ng2

1. School o f Law and Public Affair Manag ement, Jiang su Po ly technic Univ ersity , Chang zhou 213164, China; 2. Jiang su Bo aixing Lawy er Firm , Chang zhou 213004, China

关键词:

司法认知;  依法证明;  有效的具体行政行为;  认定

Keywords:

judicial cog ni tio n;  ef fectiv e specific admini strativ e act;  recog ni zing

分类号:

DF713

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

法院对待证事实的直接认定, 关系到当事人主观举证责任的承担。行政诉讼司法解释证据规则中, 对“已经依法证明的 事实” 范围, 并不明确, 法官的自由裁量权未免太大, 其对诉讼主体侵权的机会也就大大增加。未来统一证据法典中, 除规定生 效的人民法院裁判文书、仲裁机构裁决文书确认的事实以及有效公证文书所证明的事实可以直接认定外, 把有效具体行政行为认 定的事实归为“已经依法证明的事实” , 是行政权之国家权力的体现和要求, 同时, 明确规定“已经依法证明的事实” 之证明要 件, 使法院对该事实的认定更具有可操

Abstract:

Facts in issue determined by court i s related to the parties ' burden of going forw ard wi th the evidence. The scope of facts proved legally in Regulations on Evidence in Administ rative Litigation is no t clearly described. Therefore, f ree juri sdiction of judges is pow erful to some ex tent and the chance to the tort of the lawsui t subject increases. In National Unifo rm Evidence Code to be established in the future, it is of essence that such facts recogni zed by effectiv e specific administrativ e act is at t ributed to facts prov ed legally apart f rom the facts found by the awards w ith legal effect of ef fective specific administ rative act, of notarial documents, can be ascertained directly. And documents fo r testimony should also be included to make it feasible for the court to recog nize the fact s as w ell as to protect the parties ' legitimate rights.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

作者简介: 沈世娟( 1970- ) , 女, 江苏如皋人, 硕士, 副教授, 主要从事行政法学、知识产权法学研究。 　　　　　　张建松( 1972- ) , 男, 江苏溧阳人, 硕士, 三级律师, 主要从事知识产权法学研究。

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2008-09-25