[1]葛金华.苏格拉底与阿尔克比亚得关系的症候分析[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2008,9(02):80-82.
　GE J in- hua.The Symptom Analys is of the Relation sh ips Between Socrates and Alc ibiades[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2008,9(02):80-82.
点击复制

苏格拉底与阿尔克比亚得关系的症候分析()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第9卷
期数:
2008年02期
页码:
80-82
栏目:
文史研究
出版日期:
2008-06-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Symptom Analys is of the Relation sh ips Between Socrates and Alc ibiades
作者:
葛金华
江苏工业学院宣传部, 江苏常州213164
Author(s):
GE J in- hua
P ropaganda Department, J iangsu Po lytechnic U niversity, Changzhou 213164, Ch ina
关键词:
苏格拉底;  阿尔克比亚得;  关系;  症候分析
Keywords:
Socrates;  A lcib iades;  relat ion sh ip;  symp tom analysis
分类号:
B502.231　
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
苏格拉底与阿尔克比亚得的关系, 从相对独立, 到完全捆绑; 从苏格拉底为配角到阿尔克比亚得为附庸, 晚期雅典精英 对此进行了全面争夺, 并在关系的翻转中表现了不同的价值诉求。放入长远历史语境, “苏、阿”关系中“哲学改造与政治建构 对抗”这一“症候”, 标示了晚期雅典文化向内翻转的实质。
Abstract:
Socrates’ s relat ion sh ip w ith h is pup il (and male lover) , A lcib iades (450- 404 BC) , f rom the early relat ive independence ( the fo rmer, a great ph ilo sopher w h ile the lat ter, a po lit ics con st ructo r) , to the relat ion comp letely t ied up , being respon sib le fo r the delay of the A then s; f rom Socrates’s being the company on the early stage to A lcib iades’s being an un impo rtan t t ribu tary belit t led by Socrates’s fo llow ers, w as ho t ly debated by scho lars and ph ilo sophers in the later period of A then s and differen t value appealing w as disp layed in rebu ilding their relat ion sh ip s. T raced back to the long period of h isto rical background, the“symp tom ”, “the conf lict betw een ph ilo sophy t ran sfo rmat ion and po lit ical con st ruct ion” in Socrates’s relat ion sh ip w ith A lcib iades, indicated the essence of having to pu rsue the City- states st2 ab ility w ithou t the ab ility to fu lf ill the m ission of saving it s cu ltu re and rising the emp ire in later A then s.

参考文献/References:

[1] [古希腊] 色诺芬. 回忆苏格拉底[M ]. 吴永泉, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1984: 9.
[2] P lato. Apo logy [M ]. B. Jowett, translate, L andon: Oxfo rd U niversity P ress, 1892.
[3] 刘小枫, 陈少明. 苏格拉底问题[M ]. 北京: 华夏出版社, 2005.
[4] P lutarch. The L ives of the Noble Grecians and Romans [M ]. Thomas No rth, translate, Ch icago: Contempo rary Publish ing Company 1998.
[5] 汪子嵩. 在苏格拉底的审判庭上[J ]. 读书, 1994 (11) : 20.
[6] 周洪祥. 雅典远征西西里正误辨析[J ]. 北方论丛. 2005 (2) : 87.
[7] 曹础基: 庄子浅注[M ]. 北京: 中华书局, 2000: 28.
[8] [英] H. D. F. 基托: 希腊人[M ]. 徐卫翔, 黄　韬, 译. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2006: 146.
[9] 刘小枫. 现代人及其敌人, 公法学家施米特引论[M ]. 北 京: 华夏出版社, 2005: 170.
[10] [德] 尼　采. 尼采自述[M ]. 张念东, 凌素心, 译. 北京: 北京编译出版社, 2001: 51.
[11] P lato: The F irst A lcibiades [M ]. Benjam in Jowett translate, South A ustralia: eBook s@A delaide, 2006: 51.
[12] Thucydides. H isto ry of the Peloponnesian W ar [M ]. R ichard Craw ley, translate, London: J. M. Dent and Co. , 1903 (10) : 11.
[13] 顾　准. 顾准日记[M ]. 陈敏之, 译. 北京: 经济日报出 版社, 1997: 354.
[14] 沃格林. 政治观念史稿(第一卷) [M ]. 谢华育, 译. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2007: 3.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介: 葛金华(1978—) , 男, 江苏苏州人, 硕士, 主要从事西方文化、宗教史和当代媒体理论研究。
更新日期/Last Update: 2008-06-25