[1]代佳斯.“人类中心主义”机制的突破与敞开——论科幻小说《我这样的机器》《克拉拉与太阳》中的人机关系[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2023,24(06):95-104.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2023.06.011]
　Dai Jiasi.The Breakthrough and Opening of the Mechanism of “Anthropocentrism”: On the Human-Machine Relationship in the Science Fiction Novels Machines Like Me and Klara and The Sun[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2023,24(06):95-104.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2023.06.011]
点击复制

“人类中心主义”机制的突破与敞开——论科幻小说《我这样的机器》《克拉拉与太阳》中的人机关系()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第24卷
期数:
2023年06期
页码:
95-104
栏目:
人工智能与元宇宙专题研究
出版日期:
2023-11-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Breakthrough and Opening of the Mechanism of “Anthropocentrism”: On the Human-Machine Relationship in the Science Fiction Novels Machines Like Me and Klara and The Sun
作者:
代佳斯
Author(s):
Dai Jiasi
关键词:
科幻小说;  《我这样的机器》;  《克拉拉与太阳》;  人机关系;  人工智能;  敞开
Keywords:
science fiction;  Machines like Me;  Klara and The Sun;  human-machine relationship;  artificial intelligence;  open
分类号:
I106.4; B82-057
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2023.06.011
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
麦克尤恩的《我这样的机器》与石黑一雄的《克拉拉与太阳》均是新近讨论人工智能议题最受欢迎的文学代表作品,两部小说共同向读者展示了机器人“敞开”进入人类世界的三种可能性:机器人可以凝视(所看),机器人具有自主的情感意识(所想),机器人还可以创作文学甚至替代人类(所为)。然而,在“人类中心主义”思想机制的能动作用下,机器人的相继毁灭无疑是现代语境下新型“奥斯维辛大门的敞开”。在设想的新型“人机关系”中,当机器人开始具备人类的特征与意识,人类应该共情这一新型他者,审视自身,破除人类中心主义视角的傲慢与偏见,构建人机共享新型的“人类机制”,这些正是小说持存的思考。
Abstract:
Machines Like Me by McEwan and Klara and The Sun by Kazuo Ishiguro are two of the most popular literary representatives of the recent discussion of the topic of artificial intelligence. The two novels show readers three possibilities for robots to “open” into the human world: that is, robots can stare(to look); robots have autonomous emotional awareness(to think); robots can also create literature and even replace humans(to act). However, under the effect of the ideological mechanism of “anthropocentrism”, the successive destruction of robots is undoubtedly the new type of “opening of the door of Auschwitz” in the modern context. In the envisioned new “human-machine relationship”, when robots begin to possess human characteristics and consciousness, human beings should empathize with this new type of other, examine themselves, eliminate the arrogance and prejudice of the anthropocentric perspective, and construct a new type of “human mechanism” shared by both human beings and machines, which are precisely the thoughts that the novels hold.

参考文献/References:

[1]THEROUX M. Machines Like Me by Ian McEwan review:intelligent mischief[EB/OL].(2019-04-11)[2023-07-05].http://www.theguardian.com/books/2019/apr/11/machines-like-me-by-ian-mcewan-review.
[2]GARNER D. In Ian McEwan's latest, a ménage à trois:software included [EB/OL].(2019-04-22)[2023-07-05]. http://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/22/books/review-machines-like-me-ian-mcewan.html.
[3]尚必武.机器能否替代人类?:《克拉拉与太阳》中的机器人叙事与伦理选择[J].外国文学研究,2022,44(1):28-45.
[4]HEIDEGGER M. The fundamental concepts of metaphysics: world, finitude, solitude[M]. McNEILL W,WALKER N, trans. Bloomington: Indiana University Press,1995.
[5]吉奥乔·阿甘本.敞开:人与动物[M].蓝江,译.南京:南京大学出版社,2019.
[6]DERRIDA J.The animal that therefore I am[M]. WILLS D, trans. New York: Fordham University Press,2008:12.
[7]伊恩·麦克尤恩.我这样的机器[M].周小进,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2020.
[8] 石黑一雄.克拉拉与太阳[M].宋佥,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2021.
[9]JAYNES J. The origin of consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral mind[M]. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company,1976:5.
[10]雅克·德里达,伊丽莎白·卢迪内斯库.明天会怎样:雅克·德里达与伊丽莎白·卢迪内斯库对话录 [M].苏旭,译.北京:中信出版社,2002:83.
[11]边沁.道德与立法原理导论[M].时殷弘,译.北京:商务印书馆,2000:349.
[12]吴兴华.论AI时代新型人机生态建构及其意义[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2021,22(1):79-86.
[13]SIMONDON G.Two lessons on animal and man[M]. BURK D S, trans. Minneapolis: Univocal Publishing,2011:73.
[14]HO O. Book review: in Ian McEwan's Machines Like Me, an alternate history where AI arrives early [EB/OL].(2019-04-22)[2023-09-05].http://www.straitstimes.com/lifestyle/arts/book-reviewin-ian-mcewans-machines-like-me-an-alternate-history-where-ai-arrives.
[15]伊恩·麦克尤恩.麦克尤恩人民大学演讲:如果有一天“人造人”写出了小说[EB/OL].(2018-10-27)[2023-09-05].http://www.chinawriter.com.cn/n1/2018/1027/c403994-30366020.html.
[16]汉娜·阿伦特.启迪:本雅明文选[M].张旭东,王斑,译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2008:98.
[17]亚当·帕克斯.太阳之下无新意:石黑一雄小说《克拉拉与太阳》中的计划性报废[J]外国文学研究,2022,44(1):13-27.
[18]袁欣悦,尚必武.石黑一雄《克拉拉与太阳》中的技术与人类[J].外国语文,2022,38(5):1-8.
[19]伊恩·麦克尤恩,王磬.伊恩·麦克尤恩:当机器人比人类更完美甚至更道德,人类该如何自处[EB/OL].(2020-10-10)[2023-07-05].https://www.jiemian.com/article/5070929.html.
[20]吕广钊.“换生灵”克拉拉:《克拉拉与太阳》中的游牧主体与后人文主义解码[J].广东外语外贸大学学报,2023,34(4):99-112.
[21]ATTRIDGE D.The singularity of literature[M].London:Routledge,2004:97.

相似文献/References:

[1]李珂.功利主义视域下的瘟疫书写与伦理抉择—以《十字》和《末日之战》的比较为例[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2023,24(01):95.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2023.01.010]
　Li Ke.The Writing of Plague and Ethical Choices from the Perspective of Utilitarianism: A Comparative Study of The Cross and World War Z: An Oral History of the Zombie War[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2023,24(06):95.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2023.01.010]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:代佳斯,南京大学文学院博士研究生。
基金项目:江苏省研究生科研创新计划项目“论麦克尤恩小说的事件书写”(KYCX23_0041)。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01