[1]达朝玉.民行刑共治视野下高空抛物行为法律治理的逻辑回归[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2022,23(04):19-30.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2022.04.003]
　Da Chaoyu.The Logistic Regression of Legal Governance of the Behavior of Throwing Objects at Height from the Perspective of Civil-Administrative-Criminal Co-governance[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2022,23(04):19-30.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2022.04.003]
点击复制

民行刑共治视野下高空抛物行为法律治理的逻辑回归()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第23卷
期数:
2022年04期
页码:
19-30
栏目:
政治·法学研究
出版日期:
2022-08-18

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Logistic Regression of Legal Governance of the Behavior of Throwing Objects at Height from the Perspective of Civil-Administrative-Criminal Co-governance
作者:
达朝玉
Author(s):
Da Chaoyu
关键词:
民行刑共治;  民进刑退;  高空抛物罪;  法秩序统一;  行政犯法益性欠缺
Keywords:
civil-administrative-criminal co-governance;  advancement of civil law and withdrawal of criminal law;  the crime of throwing objects at height;  unity of legal order;  lack of legal benefit of administrative crime
分类号:
D924.3
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2022.04.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
从传统的民事治理到刑事治理,再到被单独归罪,高空抛物行为的法律治理方式不断演变。为了优化相关法律治理社会的效果,应当进一步优化各个部门法之间的衔接,站在“民行刑共治”“民进刑退”的立场上,通过加强民事法律责任追究和明确高空抛物行为的行政管理法规的方式来补强行政犯天然“法益性欠缺”的本质。刑法应当回归传统的严谨和谦抑,避免未来轻罪入罪化的趋势。从立法层面到司法层面的跨越上理顺高空抛物行为法律治理的逻辑,促进民行刑法律体系的协调,提升社会治理能力和效果,对引导刑事立法的价值取向具有重要的理论和现实意义。
Abstract:
From the traditional civil governance to criminal governance, and to individual conviction, the legal governance of the behavior of throwing objects at height is constantly evolving. In order to optimize the effect of relevant laws of social governance, it is necessary to further optimize the connection among branches of laws, and from the standpoint of “civil-administrative-criminal co-governance” and “advancement of civil law and withdrawal of criminal law”, to reinforce administrative crime's natural “lack of legal benefit” through strengthening the investigation of civil legal liability and clarifying the administrative regulations of the behavior of throwing objects at height. Criminal law should return to the traditional rigor and modesty to avoid the trend of criminalization of misdemeanors in the future. From the legislative level to the judicial level, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to straighten out the logic of the legal governance of the behavior of throwing objects at height, promote the coordination of civil-administrative-criminal legal system, and improve the social governance ability and effect.

参考文献/References:

[1]刘艳红.实质出罪论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2020:5-7.
[2]刘艳红.实质刑法观[M].2版.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2019:17-18.
[3]王胜明.中华人民共和国侵权责任法释义[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2010:431-432.
[4]曹险峰.侵权法之法理与高空抛物规则[J].法制与社会发展,2020,26(1):48-61.
[5]祁治国.“高空抛物”入刑的法治意义[N].北京日报,2021-03-24(3).
[6]阿奎那.阿奎那政治著作选[M].马清槐,译.北京:商务印书馆,2017:108-109.
[7]曹波.高空抛物“入刑”的正当根据及其体系性诠释[J].河北法学,2021,39(2):157-173.
[8]张明楷.高空抛物案的刑法学分析[J].法学评论,2020,38(3):12-26.
[9]张明楷.增设新罪的原则:对《刑法修正案十一(草案)》的修改意见[J].政法论丛,2020(6):3-16.
[10]应家贇.高空抛物罪的保护法益及其规范适用[J].浙江学刊,2021(5):90-98.
[11]姜涛.高空抛物罪的刑法教义学分析[J].江苏社会科学,2021(5):111-120.
[12]殷磊.高空抛物罪的法教义学分析[J].社科纵横,2021,36(6):94-100.
[13]赵栋梁.李国胜故意杀人、寻衅滋事、袭警二审被判死刑[N].人民法院报,2022-02-22(3).
[14]张明楷.刑法学:上[M].6版.北京:法律出版社,2021.
[15]张明楷.外国刑法纲要[M].2版.北京:清华大学出版社,2007:60-62.
[16]刘艳红.化解积极刑法观正当性危机的有效立法:《刑法修正案(十一)》生物安全犯罪立法总置评[J].政治与法律,2021(7):18-34.
[17]刘艳红.人性民法与物性刑法的融合发展[J].中国社会科学,2020(4):114-137.
[18]刘艳红,周佑勇.行政刑法的一般理论[M].2版.北京:北京大学出版社,2020.
[19]刘艳红.民刑共治:国家治理体系与治理能力现代化路径[J].法学论坛,2021,36(5):40-49.
[20]张泽牧.男子从21楼扔椅子,判了![EB/OL].(2021-07-08)[2022-03-24].https://new.qq.com/rain/a/20210728A0EILD00.html.
[21]冯恺.民法典高空抛物致害责任规则的体系性解读:局限与克服[J].比较法研究,2021(1):76-89.
[22]李晓明.“高空抛物”入罪的法教义学分析与方案选择[J].天津法学,2020,36(4):56-63.
[23]王利明.民法典如何保障人民美好生活需要[J].当代贵州,2020(28):71.
[24]周光权.刑法各论[M].4版.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2021.
[25]郭艳东.“高空抛物”犯罪化:立法正当性审视与规范体系性控制:以《刑法修正案(十一)》为视角[J].西部法学评论,2021(3):122-133.
[26] 大塚仁.刑法概说·总论[M].冯军,译.3版.北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2003:119-121.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:达朝玉,东南大学法学院博士研究生,最高人民法院司法大数据基地特聘研究人员。
基金项目:国家社会科学基金重大项目“数字经济的刑事安全风险防范体系建构研究”(21&ZD209)。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01