[1]胡晓博.论清代竹枝词创作中的继承与演进[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2022,23(03):89-101.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2022.03.009]
　Hu Xiaobo.On the Inheritance and Development in the Creation of Zhuzhi Ci in the Qing Dynasty[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2022,23(03):89-101.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2022.03.009]
点击复制

论清代竹枝词创作中的继承与演进()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第23卷
期数:
2022年03期
页码:
89-101
栏目:
文史哲研究
出版日期:
2022-03-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
On the Inheritance and Development in the Creation of Zhuzhi Ci in the Qing Dynasty
作者:
胡晓博
Author(s):
Hu Xiaobo
关键词:
清代竹枝词;  发展演变;  创作形式;  组诗;  自注;  政治关切
Keywords:
Zhuzhi Ci in the Qing Dynasty;  development and evolution;  creation form;  group poems;  self-annotation;  political concern
分类号:
I207.22
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2022.03.009
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
清代是竹枝词发展的鼎盛时期,但也面临着书写困境。此时期的竹枝词与唐宋元明各朝竹枝词相比,有继承也有推进。其继承表现在对唐代以来逐渐形成的七绝体诗歌样式的选择、风土内容的书写等方面。其推进则表现在企图以五绝体竹枝词打破七绝体竹枝词在创作中的垄断地位,通过大型组诗、详细加注的创作方式来突破单首或小型竹枝组词容量简短的限制,重新审视竹枝词的功能并将之引入政治生活领域等方面。清初,屈复的五言竹枝词创作主张及实践曲折地反映了作为遗民的心态; 清代中后期,竹枝词创作中组词、小注的广泛使用及域外见闻的介绍,则表现出了清人在竹枝词创作中教化民众、启迪民智及关切政治的动机。
Abstract:
The Qing Dynasty was the heyday of the development of Zhuzhi Ci, but it also faced difficulties in writing. Compared with those in the Tang, Song, Yuan and Ming Dynasties, Zhuzhi Ci in this period had both inheritance and development. The inheritance is reflected in style selection of seven-character poems which had been formed gradually since the Tang Dynasty, and writing of customs. The development is manifested in the attempt to break the monopoly of the seven-character Zhuzhi Ci in creation by the five-character Zhuzhi Ci, by means of choosing the creation method of large-scale group poems and detailed annotation in order to break through the small capacity limit of single or small-scale Zhuzhi Ci, reexamine the function of Zhuzhi Ci and introduce it into the field of political life. Five-character Zhuzhi Ci's creation tendency and practice by Qu Fu in the early Qing Dynasty reflected the sentiments of Ming descendants in a zigzag way. In the middle and late Qing Dynasty, the widespread use of Ci group, self-annotations and the introduction of overseas information in Zhuzhi Ci showed the writers' motivation of educating people, inspiring national wisdom and political concerns.

参考文献/References:

[1]贺铸.庆湖遗老诗集校注[M].王梦隐,张家顺,校注.开封:河南大学出版社,2008:415.
[2]管世铭.读雪山房唐诗序例[M].金武祥,校刊.光绪十二年(1886)刻本.
[3]孙静庵.明遗民录[M].赵一生,标点.杭州:浙江古籍出版社,1985:100.
[4]郑方坤.国朝名家诗钞小传:卷四[M].光绪十二年(1886)刻本.
[5]屈复.弱水集:卷十三[M].马墣,陈长镇,评.乾隆七年(1742)刻本.
[6]管世铭.管世铭集[M].马振君,孙景莲,点校.南京:凤凰出版社,2017:204.
[7]周兴陆.渔洋精华录汇评[M].济南:齐鲁书社,2007:31.
[8]洪为发.绝句论·律诗论·古诗论[M].侯体健,整理.北京:文化艺术出版社,2018:26.
[9]胡应麟.诗薮[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1979:105.
[10]王利器,王慎之,王子今.历代竹枝词[M].西安:陕西人民出版社,2003.
[11]董文焕.声调四谱图说:卷末[M].同治三年(1864)刻本.
[12]丘良任.竹枝纪事诗[M].广州:暨南大学出版社,1994:97.
[13]周啸天.中国绝句诗史[M].成都:四川人民出版社,2019:10.
[14]松浦友久.节奏的美学:日中诗歌论[M]. 石观海,赵德玉,赖辛,译.沈阳:辽宁大学出版社,1995:175.
[15]任中敏.唐声诗:下[M]. 张之为,戴伟华,校理.南京:凤凰出版社,2013:282.
[16]屠隆.屠隆集:第3册[M].汪超宏,主编.杭州:浙江古籍出版社,2012:195.
[17]胡震亨.唐音癸签[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1981:139.
[18]杨维桢.西湖竹枝集:序[M].光绪七年(1881)刻本.
[19]孙杰.竹枝词发展史[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2014:188-195.
[20]郭绍虞.清诗话续编:第3册[M].富寿荪,校点.上海:上海古籍出版社,1983:1675.
[21]吴淑娇.朱彝尊《鸳鸯湖棹歌》研究[J].嘉兴学院学报,2018,30(4):15-26.
[22]张澍.养素堂诗集:卷三[M].道光二十三年(1843)刻本.
[23]陈铮.黄遵宪全集:上[M].北京:中华书局,2005.
[24]黄遵宪.日本杂事诗广注[M].钟叔河,辑校.长沙:湖南人民出版社,1981.
[25]黄遵宪.日本杂事诗:卷一[M].光绪五年(1879)刻本.
[26]黄遵宪.日本国志:卷十四[M].光绪十六年(1890)刻本.
[27]康有为.康有为全集:第4集[M].姜义华,张荣华,编校.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007:1.
[28]清史列传:第19册[M].王钟翰,点校.北京:中华书局,1987:6017.
[29]李桓.国朝耆献类征初编:卷一三二[M].光绪十年(1884)刻本.
[30]冯桂芬.校邠庐抗议汇校[M].冯凯,整理.熊明心,校对.上海:上海社会科学院出版社,2015.
[31]冯桂芬.校邠庐抗议[M].刘克辉,戴宁淑,注说.郑州:河南大学出版社,2017:1.
[32]中国第一历史档案馆.清廷签议《校邠庐抗议》档案汇编:第11册[G].北京:线装书局,2008.
[33]李鸿章.李鸿章全集:第3册[M].顾廷龙,戴逸,主编.合肥:安徽教育出版社,2008:528.
[34]马国云.论“梁溪诗派”的生成及诗学倾向[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2021,22(6):101-108.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:胡晓博,安徽大学文学院博士研究生。
基金项目:江苏高校哲学社会科学研究一般项目“江苏同题竹枝词研究”(2020SJA2361); 安徽省高等学校研究生科学研究一般项目“清人竹枝词批评理论研究”(YJS20210081)。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01