[1]宣頔,徐瑞胜.法秩序统一视野下刑民交叉案件问题研究—基于390份裁判文书的实证分析[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2022,23(03):23-38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2022.03.003]
　Xuan Di,Xu Ruisheng.On the Problem of Criminal-Civil Overlapping Cases from the Perspective of Unity of Legal Order: An Empirical Analysis Based on 390 Judgement Documents[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2022,23(03):23-38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2022.03.003]
点击复制

法秩序统一视野下刑民交叉案件问题研究—基于390份裁判文书的实证分析()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第23卷
期数:
2022年03期
页码:
23-38
栏目:
政治·法学研究
出版日期:
2022-03-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
On the Problem of Criminal-Civil Overlapping Cases from the Perspective of Unity of Legal Order: An Empirical Analysis Based on 390 Judgement Documents
作者:
宣頔; 徐瑞胜
Author(s):
Xuan Di;  Xu Ruisheng
关键词:
刑民交叉;  法秩序统一;  “先刑后民”
Keywords:
criminal-civil overlapping;  unity of legal order;  “criminal trial before civil trial”
分类号:
D923; D924; D925
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2022.03.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
刑民交叉于近年成为理论界与实务界的研究热点,而该术语本身却仅停留于描述司法现象,无法适用于司法实践,在理论与实务上分别呈现研究问题各起一端和案件问题一体处理两种趋势。故与其执着于厘清概念,不如通过类型化的方法总结并贯通问题。基于刑民交叉问题既有的程序与实体的两分法,总结出两个面向背后的核心议题。然后,分别对刑事与民事案件样本所反映的实务争点与裁判要旨加以提炼,在“个案与个案”“规范与规范”两组分析框架下指出样本之间或样本自身的矛盾所在。继而引入法秩序统一原理,总结认为刑民交叉案件应经过审理进程、另案裁判、责任承担的三步检视以满足司法实践诉讼与实体问题一体解决的要求,最后尝试指出刑事与民事各自的体系化构造方向。
Abstract:
In recent years, criminal-civil overlapping has become a hot research topic in both theoretical and practical fields, but the term itself is only used to describe judicial phenomena instead of being applied to judicial practice. In theory and practice, there are two tendencies of separation of problem research and combination of case handling. Hence it is better to summarize and penetrate the problem by classification rather than be obsessed with clarifying the concept. Based on the existing dichotomy of procedure and entity of criminal-civil overlapping, the core issues behind the two aspects are summarized. Then through the extraction of the practical contention and judgment gist reflected by the samples of criminal and civil cases respectively, under two frameworks of “case and case” and “norm and norm”, the contradictions between samples or of sample itself are pointed out. Accordingly, the principle of unity of legal order are introduced and it is concluded that in order to meet the requirement of solving litigation and substantive problems together in judicial practice, criminal-civil overlapping cases should be examined in three steps: the process of trial, the judgment of a separate case and the assumption of responsibility. Finally, the respective systematization directions of criminal and civil cases are pointed out.

参考文献/References:

[1]陈兴良.刑民交叉案件的刑法适用[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2019,37(2):161-169.
[2]龙宗智.刑民交叉案件中的事实认定与证据使用[J].法学研究,2018,40(6):3-20.
[3]简爱.从刑民实体判断看交叉案件的诉讼处理机制[J].法学家,2020(1):116-129.
[4]张明楷.刑法学中的概念使用与创制[J].法商研究,2021,38(1):3-22.
[5]赵嵬.刑民交叉的存单纠纷案件之定性与审理[J].法制与社会发展,2001(1):85-95.
[6]江伟,范跃如.刑民交叉案件处理机制研究[J].法商研究,2005(4):31-36.
[7]卡尔·拉伦茨.法学方法论[M].陈爱娥,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003.
[8]李晓明,张鑫.刑民交叉案件分类及其对未来研究的影响[J].河北法学,2016,34(2):10-17.
[9]夏伟.在程序与实体之间:财产犯罪中的刑民交叉问题研究[D].南京:东南大学,2019.
[10]江平,米健.罗马法基础[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004:368-369.
[11]郑玉波.民法债编总论[M].修订2版.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004.
[12]王泽鉴.损害赔偿[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2017.
[13]周光权.“刑民交叉”案件的判断逻辑[J].中国刑事法杂志,2020(3):3-20.
[14]迪特尔·梅迪库斯.德国民法总论[M].邵建东,译.北京:法律出版社,2013:484.
[15]赵龙.民刑交叉诉讼中正当程序原则适用的规范性考察[J].华东政法大学学报,2021,24(3):144-159.
[16]于同志.重构刑民交叉案件的办理机制[J].法律适用,2019(16):3-6.
[17]刘东.涉财产刑执行中民事债权优先受偿的困境与出路[J].华东政法大学学报,2021,24(5):138-148.
[18]简爱.从“分野”到“融合”:刑事违法判断的相对独立性[J].中外法学,2019,31(2):433-454.
[19]卡尔·恩吉施.法律思维导论[M].郑永流,译.北京:法律出版社,2004:197-211.
[20]王容溥.法秩序一致性与可罚的违法性[J].东吴法律学报,2009,20(2):71-96.
[21]刘艳红.民刑共治:国家治理体系与治理能力现代化路径[J].法学论坛,2021,36(5):40-49.
[22]杨兴培.刑民交叉案件中“先刑观念”的反思与批评[J].法治研究,2014(9):64-74.
[23]陈兴良.民法对刑法的影响与刑法对民法的回应[J]法商研究,2021,38(2):26-43.
[24]于改之.法域协调视角下规范保护目的理论之重构[J].中国法学,2021(2):207-227.
[25]刘艳红.实质出罪论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2020:328.
[26]张卫平.民刑交叉诉讼关系处理的规则与法理[J].法学研究,2018,40(3):102-117.
[27]张卫平.“民事证据裁判原则”辨识[J].比较法研究,2021(2):107-121.
[28]杨秀清.刑事判决已决事实对民事诉讼的证明效:理论与规则[J].行政法学研究,2021(1):77-91.
[29]最高人民法院民事审判第二庭.《全国法院民商事审判工作会议纪要》理解与适用[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2019:251.
[30]王利明,常鹏翱.从学科分立到知识融合:我国法学学科30年之回顾与展望[J]法学,2008(12):58-67.

相似文献/References:

[1]达朝玉.民行刑共治视野下高空抛物行为法律治理的逻辑回归[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2022,23(04):19.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2022.04.003]
　Da Chaoyu.The Logistic Regression of Legal Governance of the Behavior of Throwing Objects at Height from the Perspective of Civil-Administrative-Criminal Co-governance[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2022,23(03):19.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2022.04.003]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:宣頔,法学博士,常州大学史良法学院副教授、硕士研究生导师,上海交通大学凯原法学院博士后; 徐瑞胜,常州大学史良法学院硕士研究生。
基金项目:国家社会科学基金青年项目“系统性金融风险治理的公私合作法律机制研究”(17CFX032)。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01